From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
jnair@caviumnetworks.com,
"Andrew.Pinski@caviumnetworks.com"
<Andrew.Pinski@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf tool, arm64, thunderx2: Add implementation defined events for ThunderX2
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:37:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFpQJXUfR98gWbfmiBM69wKVLM7e=ujo8LZxmUFfxJ0iTrCKsQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170406095533.GB29947@leverpostej>
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:50:33AM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:42:39PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 01:06:43PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> >> >> + "CPU" :"armv8_pmuv3_0"
>> >> >
>> >> > Please let's not hard-code the name like this. Surely we can get rid of this?
>> >> >
>> >> > The kernel doesn't currently name PMUs as armv8_pmuv3_*, and as that can
>> >> > differ across DT/ACPI and in big.LITTLE, I don't think it makes sense to
>> >> > try to rely one particular string regardless.
>> >>
>> >> This string/name is fixed for a platform. having name here is essential to
>> >> know which devices among pmu (armv8_pmuv3_0, breakpoint, software)
>> >> devices, these jevents to be added.
>> >> also this json file is specific to a arch/soc/board, it is not a
>> >> generic file to be common.
>> >
>> > This file describe the events of a CPU PMU, and CPUs are not specific to
>> > a platform in general. There are many systems using Cortex-A57, for
>> > example.
>> >
>> > Across big.LITTLE SoCs with Cortex-A57, there's no guarantee as to
>> > whether the Cortex-A57 cores would be named armv8_pmuv3_0, or
>> > armv8_pmuv3_1, etc. This would depend on the boot CPU, probe order of
>> > secondaries, etc.
some of the applications(perf etc) use sysfs files of perf PMU CORE devices.
at present the names are created as per SOC/platform like
armv8_pmuv3, armv8_cavium_thunder, armv8_cortex_a57 etc.
cpu_pmu->name = "armv8_cavium_thunder";
can we please have common name similar to x86(cpu) and call them as
cpu_0 and cpu_1?
>>
>> OK, we may not have complete name however, common part can be used to recognize
>> the PMU CORE devices from /sys/bus/event_source/devices
>> i.e we can have CPU id as "armv8_pmuv3".
>
> For better or worse, that's not the case on DT systems.
>
> I'd much rather that we identified the CPU PMUs without requiring
> particular names (e.g by looking for a "cpus" attribute).
>
>> same is extended to UNCORE as well.
>
> Could you elaborate on that? I'm not sure I follow.
>
>> mapfile.csv file will have entry for both BIG and LITTLE processors event files.
>> the jevents creates table of pmu_events_map for all entries present in
>> mapfile.csv file
>> while lookup, which ever pmu matches the cpuid of pmu_events_map
>> then corresponding table created from json file is used to add the
>> jevents to that PMU.
>
> Sorry, but I don't follow how that's related to the above.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
thanks
Ganapat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-19 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-04 7:36 [PATCH 0/3] Add support for ThunderX2 pmu events using json files Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-04 7:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf jevents: Add support to use core pmu name other than cpu Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-04 7:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf tools arm64: implement function get_cpuid_str Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-04 12:25 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-05 9:18 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-04 7:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf tool, arm64, thunderx2: Add implementation defined events for ThunderX2 Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-04 12:28 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-05 9:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-05 10:05 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 4:20 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2017-04-06 9:55 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-19 18:07 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni [this message]
2017-04-20 8:53 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-04 12:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add support for ThunderX2 pmu events using json files Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFpQJXUfR98gWbfmiBM69wKVLM7e=ujo8LZxmUFfxJ0iTrCKsQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=gpkulkarni@gmail.com \
--cc=Andrew.Pinski@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com \
--cc=jnair@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).