* [PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation
@ 2020-08-19 21:53 Raphael Norwitz
2020-08-25 10:23 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Raphael Norwitz @ 2020-08-19 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-doc
Cc: raphael.s.norwitz, Raphael Norwitz, Marc Zyngier, Jonathan Corbet
The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses" instead
of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
aforementioned wording.
Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
---
Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing identical callback
mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
-Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
+Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation
2020-08-19 21:53 [PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation Raphael Norwitz
@ 2020-08-25 10:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-28 2:24 ` Raphael Norwitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2020-08-25 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Raphael Norwitz
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-doc, raphael.s.norwitz, Jonathan Corbet
On 2020-08-19 22:53, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
> loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
> It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses"
> instead
> of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
> aforementioned wording.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing
> identical callback
> mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
> handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
>
> -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
> +Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
> hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
> be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
> interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation
2020-08-25 10:23 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2020-10-28 2:24 ` Raphael Norwitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Raphael Norwitz @ 2020-10-28 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier; +Cc: Raphael Norwitz, linux-kernel, linux-doc, Jonathan Corbet
Ping - looks like this was never applied?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 6:23 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-19 22:53, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> > The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
> > loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
> > It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses"
> > instead
> > of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
> > aforementioned wording.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing
> > identical callback
> > mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
> > handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
> >
> > -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
> > +Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
> > hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
> > be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
> > interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-28 22:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-19 21:53 [PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation Raphael Norwitz
2020-08-25 10:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-28 2:24 ` Raphael Norwitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).