Re: [PATCH] kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() quote values, don't print literals

[Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>]

On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:19 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/2/21 1:09 PM, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 10:47 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/2/21 3:35 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:18 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Before:
> >>>>>    Expected str == "world", but
> >>>>>        str == hello
> >>>>>        "world" == world
> >>>>
> >>>> After:
> >>>>>    Expected str == "world", but
> >>>>>        str == "hello"
> >>>> <we don't need to tell the user that "world" == "world">
> >>>>
> >>>> Note: like the literal ellision for integers, this doesn't handle the
> >>>> case of
> >>>>     KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "hello", "world")
> >>>> since we don't expect it to realistically happen in checked in tests.
> >>>> (If you really wanted a test to fail, KUNIT_FAIL("msg") exists)
> >>>>
> >>>> In that case, you'd get:
> >>>>>    Expected "hello" == "world", but
> >>>> <output for next failure>
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> Please run checkpatch on your patches in the future. I am seeing
> >> a few checkpatch readability type improvements that can be made.
> >>
> >> Please make changes and send v2 with Brendan's Reviewed-by.
> >
> > Are there some flags you'd like me to pass to checkpatch?
> >
> > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --git HEAD
> > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 42 lines checked
> >
>
> My commit script uses --strict which shows readability errors.

Oh neat, TIL.
I'll make sure to use that in the future, thanks!

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210402193357.819176-1-dlatypov@google.com/

>
> > Commit f66884e8b831 ("kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() quote values,
> > don't print literals") has no obvious style problems and is ready for
> > submission.
> >
> > I just rebased onto linus/master again since I know checkpatch.pl's
> > default behavior had changed recently, but I didn't see any errors
> > there.
> >
> > I know this commit made some lines go just over 80 characters, so
> > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --max-line-length=80 --git HEAD
> > ...
> > total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 42 lines checked
> >
>
> Don't worry about line wrap warns. I just ignore them. :)
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>
>
>