From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() quote values, don't print literals
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:09:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGS_qxqE9btMn639uCgDoiqO6PNnNJzqyLA4Vj+b6Ccjhpkbfg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f5df593-6584-b7d4-3b6e-ad77ee6f8760@linuxfoundation.org>
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 10:47 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/2/21 3:35 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:18 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Before:
> >>> Expected str == "world", but
> >>> str == hello
> >>> "world" == world
> >>
> >> After:
> >>> Expected str == "world", but
> >>> str == "hello"
> >> <we don't need to tell the user that "world" == "world">
> >>
> >> Note: like the literal ellision for integers, this doesn't handle the
> >> case of
> >> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "hello", "world")
> >> since we don't expect it to realistically happen in checked in tests.
> >> (If you really wanted a test to fail, KUNIT_FAIL("msg") exists)
> >>
> >> In that case, you'd get:
> >>> Expected "hello" == "world", but
> >> <output for next failure>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
> >
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Please run checkpatch on your patches in the future. I am seeing
> a few checkpatch readability type improvements that can be made.
>
> Please make changes and send v2 with Brendan's Reviewed-by.
Are there some flags you'd like me to pass to checkpatch?
$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --git HEAD
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 42 lines checked
Commit f66884e8b831 ("kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() quote values,
don't print literals") has no obvious style problems and is ready for
submission.
I just rebased onto linus/master again since I know checkpatch.pl's
default behavior had changed recently, but I didn't see any errors
there.
I know this commit made some lines go just over 80 characters, so
$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --max-line-length=80 --git HEAD
...
total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 42 lines checked
I can go and line wrap these but had figured they were more readable
this way if checkpatch.pl no longer complained by default.
Thanks,
Daniel
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-02 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-05 22:18 [PATCH] kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() quote values, don't print literals Daniel Latypov
2021-04-02 9:35 ` Brendan Higgins
2021-04-02 17:47 ` Shuah Khan
2021-04-02 19:09 ` Daniel Latypov [this message]
2021-04-02 19:19 ` Shuah Khan
2021-04-02 19:34 ` Daniel Latypov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGS_qxqE9btMn639uCgDoiqO6PNnNJzqyLA4Vj+b6Ccjhpkbfg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).