From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen@canonical.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] seccomp: add ptrace options for suspend/resume
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:10:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLM8BSwXu8XU9d4QU7mQ=oOh=dYKY3_DcBa_zjrGpK7dQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150604180303.GA32421@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/04, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Tycho Andersen
>> > @@ -556,6 +557,11 @@ static int ptrace_setoptions(struct task_struct *child, unsigned long data)
>> > if (data & ~(unsigned long)PTRACE_O_MASK)
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
>> > + if (data & PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP && !may_suspend_seccomp())
>> > + return -EPERM;
>> > +#endif
>>
>> I'd like to avoid seeing any #ifdefs added to the .c files. Using a
>> static inline for may_suspend_seccomp() should cause this statement to
>> be eliminated by the compiler.
>
> Agreed, me too, but see below.
>
>> > @@ -590,6 +590,11 @@ void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall)
>> > {
>> > int mode = current->seccomp.mode;
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
>> > + if (unlikely(current->ptrace & PT_SUSPEND_SECCOMP))
>> > + return;
>> > +#endif
>>
>> Could PT_SUSPEND_SECCOMP be defined to "0" with not
>> CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE? Then this wouldn't need ifdefs, and should
>> be similarly eliminated by the compiler.
>
> Yes, but this way we add another ugly ifdef into .h, and if you read
> this code it is not clear that this check should be eliminated by gcc.
>
> I'd suggest
>
> if (config_enabled(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) &&
> unlikely(current->ptrace & PT_SUSPEND_SECCOMP))
> return;
Ah! Yes, that makes things nicer.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-04 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 22:09 [PATCH v2] seccomp: add ptrace options for suspend/resume Tycho Andersen
2015-06-04 16:44 ` Kees Cook
2015-06-04 17:15 ` Tycho Andersen
2015-06-04 18:12 ` Kees Cook
2015-06-04 18:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-04 18:10 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2015-06-04 18:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-04 21:05 ` Tycho Andersen
2015-06-05 21:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-05 21:26 ` Tycho Andersen
2015-06-09 21:22 ` Tycho Andersen
2015-06-09 21:45 ` Kees Cook
2015-06-09 21:52 ` Tycho Andersen
2015-06-09 22:06 ` Kees Cook
2015-06-09 22:13 ` Tycho Andersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGXu5jLM8BSwXu8XU9d4QU7mQ=oOh=dYKY3_DcBa_zjrGpK7dQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
--cc=tycho.andersen@canonical.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).