Re: [PATCH] audit: remove some duplicated includes

[Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>]

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:03 PM Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:36 AM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:51 AM Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > audit.h and skbuff.h are included twice.It's unnecessary.
> > > hence just remove them.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/audit.c | 3 ---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > While there are two header files named audit.h, they are different
> > files as one lives in include/linux/audit.h, the other in
> > kernel/audit.h.  Granted, kernel/audit.h does include the
> > include/linux/audit.h file but it should be protected from multiple
> > inclusion by the _LINUX_AUDIT_H_ definition.
> >
> > I currently prefer to keep both <linux/audit.h> and "audit.h" in
> > audit.c to help make the dependencies explicit in audit.c itself.
> Hi Paul:
>
> How about fs.h and others?

In the case of linux/fs.h, I believe that you wanted to remove it
because we are already including linux/fsnotify_backend.h (or
similar), yes?  In that case I think it comes down to a similar idea:
keep linux/fs.h when we are directly referencing a function, variable,
etc. that is declared in linux/fs.h.  Needless to say, I would take
the same position with other header files.

If you can find a case where we are not making any direct references
to something in a header file, I'm happy to merge a patch which
removes that include.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com