linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	maobibo <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: block: sleeping in atomic warnings
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 08:15:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg6ohuyrmLJYTfEpDbp2Jwnef54gkcpZ3-BYgy4C6UxRQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+Ja5SRs886CEz7a@kadam>

On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:06 AM Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> block/blk-crypto-profile.c:382 __blk_crypto_evict_key() warn: sleeping in atomic context
> block/blk-crypto-profile.c:390 __blk_crypto_evict_key() warn: sleeping in atomic context

Yeah, that looks very real, but doesn't really seem to be a block bug.

__put_super() has a big comment that it's called under the sb_lock
spinlock, so it's all in atomic context, but then:

> -> __put_super()
>    -> fscrypt_destroy_keyring()
>       -> fscrypt_put_master_key_activeref()
>          -> fscrypt_destroy_prepared_key()
>             -> fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key()
>                -> blk_crypto_evict_key()

and we have a comment in __blk_crypto_evict_key() that it must be
called in "process context".

However, the *normal* unmount sequence does all the cleanup *before*
it gets sb_lock, and calls fscrypt_destroy_keyring() in process
context, which is probably why it never triggers in practice, because
the "last put" is normally there, not in __put_super.

Eric? Al?

It smells like __put_super() may need to do some parts delayed, not
under sb_lock.

              Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-07 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-29  6:04 [PATCH v4] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock Hongchen Zhang
2023-01-29  7:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-03  2:24   ` Hongchen Zhang
2023-02-06 15:58   ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-06 16:07     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-06 16:13     ` Julia Lawall
2023-02-06 16:45       ` Dan Carpenter
2023-02-06 17:54         ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-07  7:02           ` Dan Carpenter
2023-02-06 18:25         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-07 13:37         ` xen: sleeping in atomic warnings Dan Carpenter
2023-02-07 14:03           ` Juergen Gross
2023-02-07 14:06       ` block: " Dan Carpenter
2023-02-07 16:15         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2023-02-07 17:53           ` Eric Biggers
2023-02-07 18:24             ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-07 18:36               ` Eric Biggers
2023-02-07 18:57                 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-07 19:09                   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-07 19:35                   ` Eric Biggers
2023-02-07 19:49                     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-08  6:53                     ` Eric Biggers
2023-02-07 18:31         ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-08  3:15           ` Yu Kuai
2023-02-03  1:42 ` [PATCH v4] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock Hongchen Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wg6ohuyrmLJYTfEpDbp2Jwnef54gkcpZ3-BYgy4C6UxRQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zhanghongchen@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).