From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>
Cc: ntfs3@lists.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ntfs3: new NTFS driver for 5.15
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 10:34:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whFAkqwGSNXqeN4KfNwXeCzp9-uoy69_mLExEydTajvGw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa4aa155-b9b2-9099-b7a2-349d8d9d8fbd@paragon-software.com>
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 8:19 AM Konstantin Komarov
<almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com> wrote:
>
> https://github.com/Paragon-Software-Group/linux-ntfs3.git master
Oh, I didn't notice this until now, as I was lining up to actually pull this.
I probably forgot to say this originally:
For github accounts (or really, anything but kernel.org where I can
just trust the account management), I really want the pull request to
be a signed tag, not just a plain branch.
In a perfect world, it would be a PGP signature that I can trace
directly to you through the chain of trust, but I've never actually
required that.
So while I prefer to see a full chain of trust, I realize that isn't
always easy to set up, and so at least I want to see an "identity"
that stays constant so that I can see that pulls come from the same
consistent source that controls that key.
(We've also had situations where the chain of trust just didn't exist
_yet_, but then later on it can be established as a developer ends up
becoming more integral in the community)
Signed tags are easy to use - the hardest part is having any pgp key
setup at all, then git makes using the keys trivial with "git tag -s
.."
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-04 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-03 15:19 [GIT PULL] ntfs3: new NTFS driver for 5.15 Konstantin Komarov
2021-09-04 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2021-09-04 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-04 19:00 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=whFAkqwGSNXqeN4KfNwXeCzp9-uoy69_mLExEydTajvGw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ntfs3@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).