From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Is PWM subsystem maintainable?
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:33:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Veq_kEyghXAwCv8Z6zKTA-mF0bvJnALzm-2C0-dVZs9mA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170116215851.GA18142@ulmo.ba.sec>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:50:45PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm really puzzled. Do we have a maintainer for PWM subsystem? Is he
>> responsive?
>
> Oh, I'm around, just having a streak of bad luck since early December
> and therefore more busy with real life than I'd like.
Good you are here!
>> We sent already two series (1 + 4) of patches regarding to two
>> different drivers and not a single patch has been commented and / or
>> applied for *months*. One more had been sent week or so ago.
>>
>> For our uncountable pings we didn't receive any word on what's going on.
>> If there is any trouble with patches we would really eager to fix them.
>
> I'm aware of your patches and I plan on applying them for v4.11, I just
> need to find a large enough slot to apply, test build and push.
Thanks! It's indeed important to us.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-16 14:50 Is PWM subsystem maintainable? Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-16 21:58 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-16 22:33 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHp75Veq_kEyghXAwCv8Z6zKTA-mF0bvJnALzm-2C0-dVZs9mA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).