From: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org,
ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/19] locking/lockdep: Remove __cq_empty()
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:30:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHttsravNVDC882277Vwqif3oicHUnixj7NuTjNE2AL0V5cpwA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553014484.65329.10.camel@acm.org>
Thanks for review.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 00:54, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
>
> This is the most important change in this patch. Using the title "Remove __cq_empty()"
> for this patch is misleading because the above patch does something else, namely changing
> the return type of __cq_dequeue() from int into a pointer. Should this patch perhaps be
> split or should the __cq_empty() removal be left out from this patch?
I actually hesitated whether _cq_full() should be inlined as well.
Having said that, let me keep both of them and just change the return
type of __cq_dequeue().
Thanks,
Yuyang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-20 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-18 8:57 [PATCH v2 00/19] locking/lockdep: Add comments and make some code Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] locking/lockdep: Change all print_*() return type to void Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 9:45 ` Joe Perches
2019-03-19 3:28 ` Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] locking/lockdep: Add description and explanation in lockdep design doc Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] locking/lockdep: Adjust lock usage bit character checks Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] locking/lockdep: Remove useless conditional macro Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] locking/lockdep: Adjust indents for function definitions Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] locking/lockdep: Print the right depth for chain key colission Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] locking/lockdep: Update obsolete struct field description Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 16:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] locking/lockdep: Use lockdep_init_task for task initiation consistently Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] locking/lockdep: Define INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY for chain keys to start with Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] locking/lockdep: Change the range of class_idx in held_lock struct Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] locking/lockdep: Update comment Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] locking/lockdep: Remove unnecessary function pointer argument Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] locking/lockdep: Change type of the element field in circular_queue Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 16:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] locking/lockdep: Remove __cq_empty() Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-20 2:30 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] locking/lockdep: Use function pointer to avoid constant checks Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] locking/lockdep: Combine check_noncircular and check_redundant Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] locking/lockdep: Update comments on dependency search Yuyang Du
2019-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] locking/lockdep: Change if to else-if when checking bfs errors Yuyang Du
2019-03-19 16:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-19 17:19 ` Joe Perches
2019-03-20 2:02 ` Yuyang Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHttsravNVDC882277Vwqif3oicHUnixj7NuTjNE2AL0V5cpwA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=duyuyang@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).