linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sjur Brændeland" <sjurbren@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: "Amit Shah" <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Sjur Brændeland" <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] virtio_console: Add support for DMA memory allocation
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:15:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJK669bhVfgnxuF6wVtdnzs2bgiJ2HzgwfWw4uZ=EqTdm43Jow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120905143558.GB10925@redhat.com>

Hi Michael.

>> If the device then asks for VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_DMA_MEM
>> when DMA is not supported, virtio will do BUG_ON() from
>> virtio_check_driver_offered_feature().
>>
>> Is this acceptable or should we add a check in virtcons_probe()
>> and let the probing fail instead?
>>
>> E.g:
>>       /* Refuse to bind if F_DMA_MEM request cannot be met */
>>       if (!VIRTIO_CONSOLE_HAS_DMA &&
>>           (vdev->config->get_features(vdev) & (1 << VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_DMA_MEM))){
>>               dev_err(&vdev->dev,
>>                       "DMA_MEM requested, but arch does not support DMA\n");
>>               err = -EINVAL;
>>               goto fail;
>>       }
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sjur
>
> Failing probe would be cleaner. But there is still a problem:
> old driver will happily bind to that device and then
> fail to work, right?

Not just fail to work, the kernel will panic on the BUG_ON().
Remoteproc gets the virtio configuration from firmware loaded
from user space. So this type of problem might be triggered
for other virtio drivers as well.


> virtio pci has revision id for this, but remoteproc doesn't
> seem to have anything similar. Or did I miss it?

No there are currently no sanity check of
virtio type and feature bits in remoteproc.
One option may be to add this...

> If not -
> we probably need to use a different
> device id, and not a feature bit.

But if I create a new virtio console type, remoteproc
could still call the existing virtio_console with random
bad feature bits, causing kernel panic.

Even if we fix this particular problem, the general problem
still exists: bogus virtio declarations in remoteproc's firmware
may cause BUG_ON(). (Note the fundamental difference
between visualizations and remoteproc. For remoteproc
the virtio configuration comes from binaries loaded from
user space).

So maybe we should look for a more generic solution, e.g.
changing virtio probe functionality so that devices with
bad feature bits will not trigger BUG_ON(), but rather refuse
to bind the driver.

Regards,
Sjur

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-05 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-03 13:51 [RFC 1/2] virtio_console: Add support for DMA memory allocation sjur.brandeland
2012-09-03 13:51 ` [RFC 2/2] virtio_console: Add feature to disable console port sjur.brandeland
2012-09-03 14:30 ` [RFC 1/2] virtio_console: Add support for DMA memory allocation Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-03 14:57   ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-09-03 20:27     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04  6:07       ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-05 13:00         ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-09-05 14:35           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05 18:15             ` Sjur Brændeland [this message]
2012-09-05 19:16               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-07  9:24                 ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-09-04 11:28       ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-09-04 13:50         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 16:58           ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-09-04 18:55             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-06  2:04               ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-06  5:27                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-10 22:11                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-12  6:24                     ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-07  8:35                 ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-09-16  9:44                 ` [PATCH repost] virtio: don't crash when device is buggy Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-17  4:27                   ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-18 22:24                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-19  4:10                       ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJK669bhVfgnxuF6wVtdnzs2bgiJ2HzgwfWw4uZ=EqTdm43Jow@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=sjurbren@gmail.com \
    --cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).