* [patch] extcon: use correct size
@ 2016-02-04 11:36 Dan Carpenter
2016-02-04 12:47 ` walter harms
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2016-02-04 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: MyungJoo Ham, Jaewon Kim; +Cc: Chanwoo Choi, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
intended.
Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
- MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
+ MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
goto err_muic_irq;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] extcon: use correct size
2016-02-04 11:36 [patch] extcon: use correct size Dan Carpenter
@ 2016-02-04 12:47 ` walter harms
2016-02-04 19:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-02-05 1:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-05 5:14 ` Chanwoo Choi
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: walter harms @ 2016-02-04 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: MyungJoo Ham, Jaewon Kim, Chanwoo Choi, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Am 04.02.2016 12:36, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
> intended.
>
> Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> goto err_muic_irq;
> --
just for my curiosity: what is wrong with ARRAY_SIZE() ?
So far i understand is the functions intention to fill the array
completely.
re,
wh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] extcon: use correct size
2016-02-04 12:47 ` walter harms
@ 2016-02-04 19:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-02-05 2:09 ` 김재원
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2016-02-04 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: walter harms
Cc: MyungJoo Ham, Jaewon Kim, Chanwoo Choi, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:47:41PM +0100, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.02.2016 12:36, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> > MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
> > intended.
> >
> > Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> > ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> > MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> > - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> > + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> > goto err_muic_irq;
> > --
>
>
> just for my curiosity: what is wrong with ARRAY_SIZE() ?
> So far i understand is the functions intention to fill the array
> completely.
It's done pretty consistently the one way... Jaewon?
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] extcon: use correct size
2016-02-04 11:36 [patch] extcon: use correct size Dan Carpenter
2016-02-04 12:47 ` walter harms
@ 2016-02-05 1:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-05 5:14 ` Chanwoo Choi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2016-02-05 1:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: MyungJoo Ham, Jaewon Kim, Chanwoo Choi, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
2016-02-04 20:36 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>:
> The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
> intended.
>
> Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> goto err_muic_irq;
Looks correct. Issue came from our internal tree where
MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM is redefined to a value of 3.
However the subject should be fixed to match the subsystem and more
accurately describe the error.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [patch] extcon: use correct size
2016-02-04 19:53 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2016-02-05 2:09 ` 김재원
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: 김재원 @ 2016-02-05 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Dan Carpenter', 'walter harms'
Cc: 'MyungJoo Ham', 'Chanwoo Choi',
linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Hi, Dan
02/05/2016 04:53 AM에 Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:47:41PM +0100, walter harms wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 04.02.2016 12:36, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > > The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> > > MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3)
> > > as intended.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state
> > > before request IRQ')
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > > This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review
carefully.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > > b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > > index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > > @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
> > > /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> > > ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> > > MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> > > - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> > > + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> > > goto err_muic_irq;
> > > --
> >
> >
> > just for my curiosity: what is wrong with ARRAY_SIZE() ?
> > So far i understand is the functions intention to fill the array
> > completely.
>
> It's done pretty consistently the one way... Jaewon?
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
You are right.
We should read only 3-sequential register.
(MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT2, MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT3)
Reviewed-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
Thanks
Jaewon Kim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] extcon: use correct size
2016-02-04 11:36 [patch] extcon: use correct size Dan Carpenter
2016-02-04 12:47 ` walter harms
2016-02-05 1:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2016-02-05 5:14 ` Chanwoo Choi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2016-02-05 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter, MyungJoo Ham, Jaewon Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Hi Dan,
On 2016년 02월 04일 20:36, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
> intended.
>
> Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> goto err_muic_irq;
>
>
The patch title should include the correct information
of specific device.
extcon: use correct size
-> extcon: max77843: Use correct size for reading the interrupt register
Applied it.
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-05 5:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-04 11:36 [patch] extcon: use correct size Dan Carpenter
2016-02-04 12:47 ` walter harms
2016-02-04 19:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-02-05 2:09 ` 김재원
2016-02-05 1:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-05 5:14 ` Chanwoo Choi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).