Re: [v3 6/7] drm/mediatek: change the dsi phytiming calculate method

Re: [v3 6/7] drm/mediatek: change the dsi phytiming calculate method

[kbuild test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1083 bytes --]

Hi Jitao,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.1 next-20190517]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jitao-Shi/Support-dsi-for-mt8183/20190519-231001
config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=7.2.0 make.cross ARCH=arm 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mediatek-drm.ko] undefined!

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 69766 bytes --]

Re: [v3 1/7] drm/mediatek: move mipi_dsi_host_register to probe

[CK Hu]

Hi, Jitao:

On Sun, 2019-05-19 at 17:25 +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> DSI panel driver need attach function which is inculde in
> mipi_dsi_host_ops.
> 
> If mipi_dsi_host_register is not in probe, dsi panel will
> probe fail or more delay.

In [1], you have agreed this patch just for delay not for probe fail
Remove 'probe fail'.in commit message.

[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2019-May/019836.html

> 
> So move the mipi_dsi_host_register to probe from bind.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index b00eb2d2e086..6c4ac37f983d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -1045,12 +1045,6 @@ static int mtk_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = mipi_dsi_host_register(&dsi->host);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "failed to register DSI host: %d\n", ret);
> -		goto err_ddp_comp_unregister;
> -	}
> -
>  	ret = mtk_dsi_create_conn_enc(drm, dsi);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		DRM_ERROR("Encoder create failed with %d\n", ret);
> @@ -1060,8 +1054,6 @@ static int mtk_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_unregister:
> -	mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->host);
> -err_ddp_comp_unregister:
>  	mtk_ddp_comp_unregister(drm, &dsi->ddp_comp);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -1097,31 +1089,37 @@ static int mtk_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	dsi->host.ops = &mtk_dsi_ops;
>  	dsi->host.dev = dev;
> +	dsi->dev = dev;

This is for debug message, not for the timing of
mipi_dsi_host_register(), so move to an independent patch.

Regards,
CK

> +	ret = mipi_dsi_host_register(&dsi->host);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to register DSI host: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 0, 0,
>  					  &dsi->panel, &dsi->bridge);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
>  
>  	dsi->engine_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "engine");
>  	if (IS_ERR(dsi->engine_clk)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->engine_clk);
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get engine clock: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
>  	}
>  
>  	dsi->digital_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "digital");
>  	if (IS_ERR(dsi->digital_clk)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->digital_clk);
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get digital clock: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
>  	}
>  
>  	dsi->hs_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "hs");
>  	if (IS_ERR(dsi->hs_clk)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->hs_clk);
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get hs clock: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
>  	}
>  
>  	regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> @@ -1129,33 +1127,35 @@ static int mtk_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(dsi->regs)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->regs);
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to ioremap memory: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
>  	}
>  
>  	dsi->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "dphy");
>  	if (IS_ERR(dsi->phy)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->phy);
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get MIPI-DPHY: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
>  	}
>  
>  	comp_id = mtk_ddp_comp_get_id(dev->of_node, MTK_DSI);
>  	if (comp_id < 0) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to identify by alias: %d\n", comp_id);
> -		return comp_id;
> +		ret = comp_id;
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = mtk_ddp_comp_init(dev, dev->of_node, &dsi->ddp_comp, comp_id,
>  				&mtk_dsi_funcs);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize component: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
>  	}
>  
>  	irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>  	if (irq_num < 0) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request dsi irq resource\n");
> -		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get dsi irq_num: %d\n", irq_num);
> +		ret = irq_num;
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
>  	}
>  
>  	irq_set_status_flags(irq_num, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> @@ -1163,14 +1163,24 @@ static int mtk_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			       IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW, dev_name(&pdev->dev), dsi);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request mediatek dsi irq\n");
> -		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
>  	}
>  
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&dsi->irq_wait_queue);
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dsi);
>  
> -	return component_add(&pdev->dev, &mtk_dsi_component_ops);
> +	ret = component_add(&pdev->dev, &mtk_dsi_component_ops);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add component: %d\n", ret);
> +		goto err_unregister_host;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_unregister_host:
> +	mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->host);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int mtk_dsi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

Re: [v3 1/7] drm/mediatek: move mipi_dsi_host_register to probe

[Hsin-Yi Wang]

On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 9:25 AM Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com> wrote:

> @@ -1045,12 +1045,6 @@ static int mtk_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>                 return ret;
>         }
>
> -       ret = mipi_dsi_host_register(&dsi->host);
> -       if (ret < 0) {
> -               dev_err(dev, "failed to register DSI host: %d\n", ret);
> -               goto err_ddp_comp_unregister;
> -       }
> -
>         ret = mtk_dsi_create_conn_enc(drm, dsi);
>         if (ret) {
>                 DRM_ERROR("Encoder create failed with %d\n", ret);
> @@ -1060,8 +1054,6 @@ static int mtk_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>         return 0;
>
>  err_unregister:
> -       mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->host);
> -err_ddp_comp_unregister:
>         mtk_ddp_comp_unregister(drm, &dsi->ddp_comp);
>         return ret;
>  }
> @@ -1097,31 +1089,37 @@ static int mtk_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         dsi->host.ops = &mtk_dsi_ops;
>         dsi->host.dev = dev;
> +       dsi->dev = dev;
> +       ret = mipi_dsi_host_register(&dsi->host);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "failed to register DSI host: %d\n", ret);
> +               return ret;
> +       }
>
Since mipi_dsi_host_register() is moved from .bind to .probe,
mipi_dsi_host_unregister() should also be moved from .unbind to
.remove?

Thanks

Re: [v3 6/7] drm/mediatek: change the dsi phytiming calculate method

[Ryan Case]

Hi Jitao,

On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 2:27 AM Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Change the method of frame rate calc which can get more accurate
> frame rate.
>
> data rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel / lanes
> Adjust hfp_wc to adapt the additional phy_data
>
> if MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST
>         hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12 - 6;
> else
>         hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12;
>
> Note:
> //(2: 1 for sync, 1 for phy idle)
> data_phy_cycles = T_hs_exit + T_lpx + T_hs_prepare + T_hs_zero + 2;
>
> bpp: bit per pixel
>
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index 1165ff944889..3f51b2000c68 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,25 @@
>         (type == MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_READ_REQUEST_2_PARAM) || \
>         (type == MIPI_DSI_DCS_READ))
>
> +struct mtk_phy_timing {
> +       u32 lpx;
> +       u32 da_hs_prepare;
> +       u32 da_hs_zero;
> +       u32 da_hs_trail;
> +
> +       u32 ta_go;
> +       u32 ta_sure;
> +       u32 ta_get;
> +       u32 da_hs_exit;
> +
> +       u32 clk_hs_zero;
> +       u32 clk_hs_trail;
> +
> +       u32 clk_hs_prepare;
> +       u32 clk_hs_post;
> +       u32 clk_hs_exit;
> +};
> +
>  struct phy;
>
>  struct mtk_dsi_driver_data {
> @@ -182,12 +201,13 @@ struct mtk_dsi {
>         struct clk *digital_clk;
>         struct clk *hs_clk;
>
> -       u32 data_rate;
> +       u64 data_rate;
>
>         unsigned long mode_flags;
>         enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format format;
>         unsigned int lanes;
>         struct videomode vm;
> +       struct mtk_phy_timing phy_timing;
>         int refcount;
>         bool enabled;
>         u32 irq_data;
> @@ -221,17 +241,39 @@ static void mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  {
>         u32 timcon0, timcon1, timcon2, timcon3;
>         u32 ui, cycle_time;
> +       struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
> +
> +       ui = 1000000000 / dsi->data_rate;
> +       cycle_time = 8000000000 / dsi->data_rate;
> +
> +       timing->lpx = NS_TO_CYCLE(60, cycle_time);
> +       timing->da_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE((40 + 5 * ui), cycle_time);
> +       timing->da_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE((110 + 6 * ui), cycle_time);
> +       timing->da_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(((0x4 * ui) + 80), cycle_time);
> +
> +       if (timing->da_hs_zero > timing->da_hs_prepare)
> +               timing->da_hs_zero -= timing->da_hs_prepare;

I don't follow why the above comparison and subtraction is necessary
when the values are being explicitly set immediately prior and it
seems to introduce a bug. Leftover from an early revision?

It looks like you've tuned the values such that hs_prepare+hs_zero are
just above the minimum requirements for that sum, however due to this
comparison and subtraction we wind up with a value of
hs_prepare+hs_zero-hs_prepare and fall below spec. Either boosting the
initial value set for hs_zero or removing the comparison makes display
happy again. Since I don't see any reason for the compare and subtract
I'd just drop that.

> +
> +       timing->ta_go = 4 * timing->lpx;
> +       timing->ta_sure = 3 * timing->lpx / 2;
> +       timing->ta_get = 5 * timing->lpx;
> +       timing->da_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
> +
> +       timing->clk_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x150, cycle_time);
> +       timing->clk_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x64, cycle_time) + 0xa;
>
> -       ui = 1000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
> -       cycle_time = 8000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
> +       timing->clk_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x40, cycle_time);
> +       timing->clk_hs_post = NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time);
> +       timing->clk_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;

There is a lot of alternating between hex and decimal values in this
function which makes it a little hard to follow. Would be nice to
stick to one or the other.

>
> -       timcon0 = T_LPX | T_HS_PREP << 8 | T_HS_ZERO << 16 | T_HS_TRAIL << 24;
> -       timcon1 = 4 * T_LPX | (3 * T_LPX / 2) << 8 | 5 * T_LPX << 16 |
> -                 T_HS_EXIT << 24;
> -       timcon2 = ((NS_TO_CYCLE(0x64, cycle_time) + 0xa) << 24) |
> -                 (NS_TO_CYCLE(0x150, cycle_time) << 16);
> -       timcon3 = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x40, cycle_time) | (2 * T_LPX) << 16 |
> -                 NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time) << 8;
> +       timcon0 = timing->lpx | timing->da_hs_prepare << 8 |
> +                 timing->da_hs_zero << 16 | timing->da_hs_trail << 24;
> +       timcon1 = timing->ta_go | timing->ta_sure << 8 |
> +                 timing->ta_get << 16 | timing->da_hs_exit << 24;
> +       timcon2 = 1 << 8 | timing->clk_hs_zero << 16 |
> +                 timing->clk_hs_trail << 24;
> +       timcon3 = timing->clk_hs_prepare | timing->clk_hs_post << 8 |
> +                 timing->clk_hs_exit << 16;
>
>         writel(timcon0, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON0);
>         writel(timcon1, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON1);
> @@ -418,7 +460,8 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>         u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
>         u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
>         u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> -       u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +       u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> +       struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
>
>         struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
>
> @@ -433,7 +476,8 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>         writel(vm->vactive, dsi->regs + DSI_VACT_NL);
>
>         if (dsi->driver_data->has_size_ctl)
> -               writel(vm->vactive << 16 | vm->hactive, dsi->regs + DSI_SIZE_CON);
> +               writel(vm->vactive << 16 | vm->hactive,
> +                      dsi->regs + DSI_SIZE_CON);
>
>         horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
>
> @@ -444,7 +488,34 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>                 horizontal_backporch_byte = ((vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
>                         dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
>
> -       horizontal_frontporch_byte = (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 12);
> +       data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> +                                 timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit + 2;
> +
> +       if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> +               if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> +                   data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> +                       horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> +                                                    dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> +                                                    data_phy_cycles *
> +                                                    dsi->lanes - 18;
> +               } else {
> +                       DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> +                       horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> +                                                    dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +               }
> +       } else {
> +               if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> +                   data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> +                       horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> +                                                    dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> +                                                    data_phy_cycles *
> +                                                    dsi->lanes - 12;
> +               } else {
> +                       DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> +                       horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> +                                                    dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +               }
> +       }
>
>         writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
>         writel(horizontal_backporch_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HBP_WC);
> @@ -544,8 +615,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  {
>         struct device *dev = dsi->dev;
>         int ret;
> -       u64 pixel_clock, total_bits;
> -       u32 htotal, htotal_bits, bit_per_pixel, overhead_cycles, overhead_bits;
> +       u32 bit_per_pixel;
>
>         if (++dsi->refcount != 1)
>                 return 0;
> @@ -564,24 +634,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>                 break;
>         }
>
> -       /**
> -        * htotal_time = htotal * byte_per_pixel / num_lanes
> -        * overhead_time = lpx + hs_prepare + hs_zero + hs_trail + hs_exit
> -        * mipi_ratio = (htotal_time + overhead_time) / htotal_time
> -        * data_rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel * mipi_ratio / num_lanes;
> -        */
> -       pixel_clock = dsi->vm.pixelclock;
> -       htotal = dsi->vm.hactive + dsi->vm.hback_porch + dsi->vm.hfront_porch +
> -                       dsi->vm.hsync_len;
> -       htotal_bits = htotal * bit_per_pixel;
> -
> -       overhead_cycles = T_LPX + T_HS_PREP + T_HS_ZERO + T_HS_TRAIL +
> -                       T_HS_EXIT;
> -       overhead_bits = overhead_cycles * dsi->lanes * 8;
> -       total_bits = htotal_bits + overhead_bits;
> -
> -       dsi->data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pixel_clock * total_bits,
> -                                         htotal * dsi->lanes);
> +       dsi->data_rate = dsi->vm.pixelclock * bit_per_pixel / dsi->lanes;
>
>         ret = clk_set_rate(dsi->hs_clk, dsi->data_rate);
>         if (ret < 0) {


With the earlier fix feel free to add to the next revision
Tested-by: Ryan Case <ryandcase@chromium.org>

Re: [v3 3/7] drm/mediatek: add dsi reg commit disable control

[CK Hu]

Hi, Jitao:

On Sun, 2019-05-19 at 17:25 +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> New DSI IP has shadow register and working reg. The register
> values are writen to shadow register. And then trigger with
> commit reg, the register values will be moved working register.
> 
> This fucntion is defualt on. But this driver doesn't use this
> function. So add the disable control.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index a48db056df6c..fd367985c7fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@
>  #define VM_CMD_EN			BIT(0)
>  #define TS_VFP_EN			BIT(5)
>  
> +#define DSI_SHADOW_DEBUG	0x190U
> +#define FORCE_COMMIT		BIT(0)
> +#define BYPASS_SHADOW		BIT(1)

One more 'tab' for bitwise definition.

Regards,
CK

> +
>  #define CONFIG				(0xff << 0)
>  #define SHORT_PACKET			0
>  #define LONG_PACKET			2
> @@ -157,6 +161,7 @@ struct phy;
>  
>  struct mtk_dsi_driver_data {
>  	const u32 reg_cmdq_off;
> +	bool has_shadow_ctl;
>  };
>  
>  struct mtk_dsi {
> @@ -594,6 +599,11 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  	}
>  
>  	mtk_dsi_enable(dsi);
> +
> +	if (dsi->driver_data->has_shadow_ctl)
> +		writel(FORCE_COMMIT | BYPASS_SHADOW,
> +		       dsi->regs + DSI_SHADOW_DEBUG);
> +
>  	mtk_dsi_reset_engine(dsi);
>  	mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(dsi);
>  

Re: [v3 7/7] drm: mediatek: adjust dsi and mipi_tx probe sequence

[CK Hu]

Hi, Jitao:

On Sun, 2019-05-19 at 17:25 +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> mtk_mipi_tx is the phy of mtk_dsi.
> mtk_dsi get the phy(mtk_mipi_tx) in probe().
> 
> So,  mtk_mipi_tx init should be ahead of mtk_dsi. Or mtk_dsi will
> defer to wait mtk_mipi_tx probe done.

Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> index cf59ea9bccfd..583d533d9574 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> @@ -633,8 +633,8 @@ static struct platform_driver * const mtk_drm_drivers[] = {
>  	&mtk_disp_rdma_driver,
>  	&mtk_dpi_driver,
>  	&mtk_drm_platform_driver,
> -	&mtk_dsi_driver,
>  	&mtk_mipi_tx_driver,
> +	&mtk_dsi_driver,
>  };
>  
>  static int __init mtk_drm_init(void)

Re: [v3 6/7] drm/mediatek: change the dsi phytiming calculate method

[Guenter Roeck]

On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 05:25:36PM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> Change the method of frame rate calc which can get more accurate
> frame rate.
> 
> data rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel / lanes
> Adjust hfp_wc to adapt the additional phy_data
> 
> if MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST
> 	hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12 - 6;
> else
> 	hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12;
> 
> Note:
> //(2: 1 for sync, 1 for phy idle)
> data_phy_cycles = T_hs_exit + T_lpx + T_hs_prepare + T_hs_zero + 2;
> 
> bpp: bit per pixel
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> Tested-by: Ryan Case <ryandcase@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index 1165ff944889..3f51b2000c68 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,25 @@
>  	(type == MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_READ_REQUEST_2_PARAM) || \
>  	(type == MIPI_DSI_DCS_READ))
>  
> +struct mtk_phy_timing {
> +	u32 lpx;
> +	u32 da_hs_prepare;
> +	u32 da_hs_zero;
> +	u32 da_hs_trail;
> +
> +	u32 ta_go;
> +	u32 ta_sure;
> +	u32 ta_get;
> +	u32 da_hs_exit;
> +
> +	u32 clk_hs_zero;
> +	u32 clk_hs_trail;
> +
> +	u32 clk_hs_prepare;
> +	u32 clk_hs_post;
> +	u32 clk_hs_exit;
> +};
> +
>  struct phy;
>  
>  struct mtk_dsi_driver_data {
> @@ -182,12 +201,13 @@ struct mtk_dsi {
>  	struct clk *digital_clk;
>  	struct clk *hs_clk;
>  
> -	u32 data_rate;
> +	u64 data_rate;

This results in 64-bit divide operations and thus build failures
with 32-bit builds. More on that below.

>  
>  	unsigned long mode_flags;
>  	enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format format;
>  	unsigned int lanes;
>  	struct videomode vm;
> +	struct mtk_phy_timing phy_timing;
>  	int refcount;
>  	bool enabled;
>  	u32 irq_data;
> @@ -221,17 +241,39 @@ static void mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  {
>  	u32 timcon0, timcon1, timcon2, timcon3;
>  	u32 ui, cycle_time;
> +	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
> +
> +	ui = 1000000000 / dsi->data_rate;
> +	cycle_time = 8000000000 / dsi->data_rate;

This results in 64-bit divide operations. On top of that, 8000000000
is larger than 0xffffffff, resulting in an integer overflow on 32-bit
systems; it should be provided as 8000000000ULL. 

> +
> +	timing->lpx = NS_TO_CYCLE(60, cycle_time);
> +	timing->da_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE((40 + 5 * ui), cycle_time);
> +	timing->da_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE((110 + 6 * ui), cycle_time);
> +	timing->da_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(((0x4 * ui) + 80), cycle_time);
> +
> +	if (timing->da_hs_zero > timing->da_hs_prepare)
> +		timing->da_hs_zero -= timing->da_hs_prepare;
> +
> +	timing->ta_go = 4 * timing->lpx;
> +	timing->ta_sure = 3 * timing->lpx / 2;
> +	timing->ta_get = 5 * timing->lpx;
> +	timing->da_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
> +
> +	timing->clk_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x150, cycle_time);
> +	timing->clk_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x64, cycle_time) + 0xa;
>  
> -	ui = 1000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
> -	cycle_time = 8000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
> +	timing->clk_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x40, cycle_time);
> +	timing->clk_hs_post = NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time);
> +	timing->clk_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
>  
> -	timcon0 = T_LPX | T_HS_PREP << 8 | T_HS_ZERO << 16 | T_HS_TRAIL << 24;
> -	timcon1 = 4 * T_LPX | (3 * T_LPX / 2) << 8 | 5 * T_LPX << 16 |
> -		  T_HS_EXIT << 24;
> -	timcon2 = ((NS_TO_CYCLE(0x64, cycle_time) + 0xa) << 24) |
> -		  (NS_TO_CYCLE(0x150, cycle_time) << 16);
> -	timcon3 = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x40, cycle_time) | (2 * T_LPX) << 16 |
> -		  NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time) << 8;
> +	timcon0 = timing->lpx | timing->da_hs_prepare << 8 |
> +		  timing->da_hs_zero << 16 | timing->da_hs_trail << 24;
> +	timcon1 = timing->ta_go | timing->ta_sure << 8 |
> +		  timing->ta_get << 16 | timing->da_hs_exit << 24;
> +	timcon2 = 1 << 8 | timing->clk_hs_zero << 16 |
> +		  timing->clk_hs_trail << 24;
> +	timcon3 = timing->clk_hs_prepare | timing->clk_hs_post << 8 |
> +		  timing->clk_hs_exit << 16;
>  
>  	writel(timcon0, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON0);
>  	writel(timcon1, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON1);
> @@ -418,7 +460,8 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  	u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
>  	u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
>  	u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> -	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> +	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
>  
>  	struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
>  
> @@ -433,7 +476,8 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  	writel(vm->vactive, dsi->regs + DSI_VACT_NL);
>  
>  	if (dsi->driver_data->has_size_ctl)
> -		writel(vm->vactive << 16 | vm->hactive, dsi->regs + DSI_SIZE_CON);
> +		writel(vm->vactive << 16 | vm->hactive,
> +		       dsi->regs + DSI_SIZE_CON);
>  
>  	horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
>  
> @@ -444,7 +488,34 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  		horizontal_backporch_byte = ((vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
>  			dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
>  
> -	horizontal_frontporch_byte = (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 12);
> +	data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> +				  timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit + 2;
> +
> +	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> +		if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> +		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> +			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> +						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> +						     data_phy_cycles *
> +						     dsi->lanes - 18;
> +		} else {
> +			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> +			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> +						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> +		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> +			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> +						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> +						     data_phy_cycles *
> +						     dsi->lanes - 12;
> +		} else {
> +			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> +			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> +						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
>  	writel(horizontal_backporch_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HBP_WC);
> @@ -544,8 +615,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = dsi->dev;
>  	int ret;
> -	u64 pixel_clock, total_bits;
> -	u32 htotal, htotal_bits, bit_per_pixel, overhead_cycles, overhead_bits;
> +	u32 bit_per_pixel;
>  
>  	if (++dsi->refcount != 1)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -564,24 +634,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	/**
> -	 * htotal_time = htotal * byte_per_pixel / num_lanes
> -	 * overhead_time = lpx + hs_prepare + hs_zero + hs_trail + hs_exit
> -	 * mipi_ratio = (htotal_time + overhead_time) / htotal_time
> -	 * data_rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel * mipi_ratio / num_lanes;
> -	 */
> -	pixel_clock = dsi->vm.pixelclock;
> -	htotal = dsi->vm.hactive + dsi->vm.hback_porch + dsi->vm.hfront_porch +
> -			dsi->vm.hsync_len;
> -	htotal_bits = htotal * bit_per_pixel;
> -
> -	overhead_cycles = T_LPX + T_HS_PREP + T_HS_ZERO + T_HS_TRAIL +
> -			T_HS_EXIT;
> -	overhead_bits = overhead_cycles * dsi->lanes * 8;
> -	total_bits = htotal_bits + overhead_bits;
> -
> -	dsi->data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pixel_clock * total_bits,
> -					  htotal * dsi->lanes);
> +	dsi->data_rate = dsi->vm.pixelclock * bit_per_pixel / dsi->lanes;

pixelclock and bit_per_pixel are not u64, and neither is dsi->lanes.
The above will thus be a 32-bit operation on 32-bit systems, and never
really assign a true 64-bit value to data_rate. On top of that,
clk_set_rate() expects an unsigned long argument. Declaring data_rate
as anything but unsigned long has therefore no value.

Note that the old code took possible overflow conditions due to interim
results larger than u32 / unsigned long into account. This is no longer
the case. I don't know if this is a concern, but it might be worth watching
out for. If it is not a concern because the code is not anymore expected
to run on 32-bit systems, it should be restricted to 64-bit builds.

Guenter

>  
>  	ret = clk_set_rate(dsi->hs_clk, dsi->data_rate);
>  	if (ret < 0) {