Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/tsc: skip tsc watchdog checking for qualified platforms

From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	paulmck@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, andi.kleen@intel.com,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	tim.c.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/tsc: skip tsc watchdog checking for qualified platforms
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 23:47:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJRGBZznZOxqfOE471jUUTupPeZ-zW31sRo+0p5o0SeFKSqF9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211117023751.24190-2-feng.tang@intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:18 PM Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> There are cases that tsc clocksources are wrongly judged as unstable by
> clocksource watchdogs like hpet, acpi_pm or 'refined-jiffies'. While
> there is hardly a general reliable way to check the validity of a
> watchdog, and to protect the innocent tsc, Thomas Gleixner proposed [1]:
>
> "I'm inclined to lift that requirement when the CPU has:
>
>     1) X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC
>     2) X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC
>     3) X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3
>     4) X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST
>     5) At max. 4 sockets
>
>  After two decades of horrors we're finally at a point where TSC seems
>  to be halfway reliable and less abused by BIOS tinkerers. TSC_ADJUST
>  was really key as we can now detect even small modifications reliably
>  and the important point is that we can cure them as well (not pretty
>  but better than all other options)."
>
> As feature #3 X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3 only exists on several generations
> of Atom processor, and is always coupled with X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC
> and X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC, skip checking it, and also be more defensive
> to use maxim of 2 sockets.
>
> The check is done inside tsc_init() before registering 'tsc-early' and
> 'tsc' clocksources, as there were cases that both of them had been
> wrongly judged as unreliable.
>
> For more background of tsc/watchdog, there is a good summary in [2]
>
> [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87eekfk8bd.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
> [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87a6pimt1f.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> ---
> Change log:
>
>   v3:
>     * rebased against 5.16-rc1
>     * refine commit log
>
>   v2:
>     * Directly skip watchdog check without messing flag
>       'tsc_clocksource_reliable' (Thomas)
>
>  arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

retry:

Reviewed-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>