From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tiantao <tiantao6@huawei.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI/PPTT: fixed some parameter type is not right
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:48:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gN4A+eRtebxY=8DYfFiRE7FWO_3=a4m9G1_sgUsGPBWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1577706988-56848-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 1:01 PM Xiongfeng Wang
<wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tian Tao <tiantao6@huawei.com>
>
> The fourth parameter 'level' of function 'acpi_find_cache_level()' is a
> signed interger, but its caller 'acpi_find_cache_node()' passes that
> parameter an unsigned interger. This patch fixes the paramter type
> inconsistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
>
> ---
> v2: fix the conflicts in the third hunk.
> Modify the commit information a little bit.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index f31544d..4ae9335 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -98,11 +98,11 @@ static inline bool acpi_pptt_match_type(int table_type, int type)
> *
> * Return: The cache structure and the level we terminated with.
> */
> -static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> - int local_level,
> - struct acpi_subtable_header *res,
> - struct acpi_pptt_cache **found,
> - int level, int type)
> +static unsigned int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> + unsigned int local_level,
> + struct acpi_subtable_header *res,
> + struct acpi_pptt_cache **found,
> + unsigned int level, int type)
> {
> struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache;
>
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> if (*found != NULL && cache != *found)
> pr_warn("Found duplicate cache level/type unable to determine uniqueness\n");
>
> - pr_debug("Found cache @ level %d\n", level);
> + pr_debug("Found cache @ level %u\n", level);
> *found = cache;
> /*
> * continue looking at this node's resource list
> @@ -132,16 +132,17 @@ static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> return local_level;
> }
>
> -static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> - struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node,
> - int *starting_level, int level,
> - int type)
> +static struct acpi_pptt_cache *
> +acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node,
> + unsigned int *starting_level, unsigned int level,
> + int type)
> {
> struct acpi_subtable_header *res;
> - int number_of_levels = *starting_level;
> + unsigned int number_of_levels = *starting_level;
> int resource = 0;
> struct acpi_pptt_cache *ret = NULL;
> - int local_level;
> + unsigned int local_level;
>
> /* walk down from processor node */
> while ((res = acpi_get_pptt_resource(table_hdr, cpu_node, resource))) {
> @@ -321,12 +322,12 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_node(struct acpi_table_header *ta
> unsigned int level,
> struct acpi_pptt_processor **node)
> {
> - int total_levels = 0;
> + unsigned int total_levels = 0;
> struct acpi_pptt_cache *found = NULL;
> struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> u8 acpi_type = acpi_cache_type(type);
>
> - pr_debug("Looking for CPU %d's level %d cache type %d\n",
> + pr_debug("Looking for CPU %d's level %u cache type %d\n",
> acpi_cpu_id, level, acpi_type);
>
> cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table_hdr, acpi_cpu_id);
> --
Applied for 5.6 as "ACPI: PPTT: Consistently use unsigned int as
parameter type" with some minor changes in the changelog.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-07 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-30 11:56 [PATCH v2] ACPI/PPTT: fixed some parameter type is not right Xiongfeng Wang
2020-01-07 10:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0gN4A+eRtebxY=8DYfFiRE7FWO_3=a4m9G1_sgUsGPBWA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tiantao6@huawei.com \
--cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).