* [PATCH v2] ACPI/PPTT: fixed some parameter type is not right
@ 2019-12-30 11:56 Xiongfeng Wang
2020-01-07 10:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Xiongfeng Wang @ 2019-12-30 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb
Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, tiantao6, jonathan.cameron, guohanjun,
wangxiongfeng2
From: Tian Tao <tiantao6@huawei.com>
The fourth parameter 'level' of function 'acpi_find_cache_level()' is a
signed interger, but its caller 'acpi_find_cache_node()' passes that
parameter an unsigned interger. This patch fixes the paramter type
inconsistency.
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
---
v2: fix the conflicts in the third hunk.
Modify the commit information a little bit.
---
drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
index f31544d..4ae9335 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
@@ -98,11 +98,11 @@ static inline bool acpi_pptt_match_type(int table_type, int type)
*
* Return: The cache structure and the level we terminated with.
*/
-static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
- int local_level,
- struct acpi_subtable_header *res,
- struct acpi_pptt_cache **found,
- int level, int type)
+static unsigned int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+ unsigned int local_level,
+ struct acpi_subtable_header *res,
+ struct acpi_pptt_cache **found,
+ unsigned int level, int type)
{
struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache;
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
if (*found != NULL && cache != *found)
pr_warn("Found duplicate cache level/type unable to determine uniqueness\n");
- pr_debug("Found cache @ level %d\n", level);
+ pr_debug("Found cache @ level %u\n", level);
*found = cache;
/*
* continue looking at this node's resource list
@@ -132,16 +132,17 @@ static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
return local_level;
}
-static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
- struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node,
- int *starting_level, int level,
- int type)
+static struct acpi_pptt_cache *
+acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+ struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node,
+ unsigned int *starting_level, unsigned int level,
+ int type)
{
struct acpi_subtable_header *res;
- int number_of_levels = *starting_level;
+ unsigned int number_of_levels = *starting_level;
int resource = 0;
struct acpi_pptt_cache *ret = NULL;
- int local_level;
+ unsigned int local_level;
/* walk down from processor node */
while ((res = acpi_get_pptt_resource(table_hdr, cpu_node, resource))) {
@@ -321,12 +322,12 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_node(struct acpi_table_header *ta
unsigned int level,
struct acpi_pptt_processor **node)
{
- int total_levels = 0;
+ unsigned int total_levels = 0;
struct acpi_pptt_cache *found = NULL;
struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
u8 acpi_type = acpi_cache_type(type);
- pr_debug("Looking for CPU %d's level %d cache type %d\n",
+ pr_debug("Looking for CPU %d's level %u cache type %d\n",
acpi_cpu_id, level, acpi_type);
cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table_hdr, acpi_cpu_id);
--
1.7.12.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI/PPTT: fixed some parameter type is not right
2019-12-30 11:56 [PATCH v2] ACPI/PPTT: fixed some parameter type is not right Xiongfeng Wang
@ 2020-01-07 10:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-01-07 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiongfeng Wang
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, tiantao, Jonathan Cameron, Hanjun Guo
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 1:01 PM Xiongfeng Wang
<wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tian Tao <tiantao6@huawei.com>
>
> The fourth parameter 'level' of function 'acpi_find_cache_level()' is a
> signed interger, but its caller 'acpi_find_cache_node()' passes that
> parameter an unsigned interger. This patch fixes the paramter type
> inconsistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
>
> ---
> v2: fix the conflicts in the third hunk.
> Modify the commit information a little bit.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index f31544d..4ae9335 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -98,11 +98,11 @@ static inline bool acpi_pptt_match_type(int table_type, int type)
> *
> * Return: The cache structure and the level we terminated with.
> */
> -static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> - int local_level,
> - struct acpi_subtable_header *res,
> - struct acpi_pptt_cache **found,
> - int level, int type)
> +static unsigned int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> + unsigned int local_level,
> + struct acpi_subtable_header *res,
> + struct acpi_pptt_cache **found,
> + unsigned int level, int type)
> {
> struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache;
>
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> if (*found != NULL && cache != *found)
> pr_warn("Found duplicate cache level/type unable to determine uniqueness\n");
>
> - pr_debug("Found cache @ level %d\n", level);
> + pr_debug("Found cache @ level %u\n", level);
> *found = cache;
> /*
> * continue looking at this node's resource list
> @@ -132,16 +132,17 @@ static int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> return local_level;
> }
>
> -static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> - struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node,
> - int *starting_level, int level,
> - int type)
> +static struct acpi_pptt_cache *
> +acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node,
> + unsigned int *starting_level, unsigned int level,
> + int type)
> {
> struct acpi_subtable_header *res;
> - int number_of_levels = *starting_level;
> + unsigned int number_of_levels = *starting_level;
> int resource = 0;
> struct acpi_pptt_cache *ret = NULL;
> - int local_level;
> + unsigned int local_level;
>
> /* walk down from processor node */
> while ((res = acpi_get_pptt_resource(table_hdr, cpu_node, resource))) {
> @@ -321,12 +322,12 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_node(struct acpi_table_header *ta
> unsigned int level,
> struct acpi_pptt_processor **node)
> {
> - int total_levels = 0;
> + unsigned int total_levels = 0;
> struct acpi_pptt_cache *found = NULL;
> struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> u8 acpi_type = acpi_cache_type(type);
>
> - pr_debug("Looking for CPU %d's level %d cache type %d\n",
> + pr_debug("Looking for CPU %d's level %u cache type %d\n",
> acpi_cpu_id, level, acpi_type);
>
> cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table_hdr, acpi_cpu_id);
> --
Applied for 5.6 as "ACPI: PPTT: Consistently use unsigned int as
parameter type" with some minor changes in the changelog.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-07 10:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-30 11:56 [PATCH v2] ACPI/PPTT: fixed some parameter type is not right Xiongfeng Wang
2020-01-07 10:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).