From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
kernel@puri.sm, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
aford173@gmail.com, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] power: domain: handle genpd correctly when needing interrupts
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:33:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hG4+z=ypDudiSnhG1SUxfLv+EFsUGOjQEqUi0EKH3+Rw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrLLw=y9+t3f_bOH2mw2NVDGJxKE5=+XHY7C6SUzLzUDg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 5:07 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 10:33, Martin Kepplinger
> <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm> wrote:
> >
> > If for example the power-domains' power-supply node (regulator) needs
> > interrupts to work, the current setup with noirq callbacks cannot
> > work; for example a pmic regulator on i2c, when suspending, usually already
> > times out during suspend_noirq:
> >
> > [ 41.024193] buck4: failed to disable: -ETIMEDOUT
> >
> > So fix system suspend and resume for these power-domains by using the
> > "outer" suspend/resume callbacks instead. Tested on the imx8mq-librem5 board,
> > but by looking at the dts, this will fix imx8mq-evk and possibly many other
> > boards too.
> >
> > This is designed so that genpd providers just say "this genpd needs
> > interrupts" (by setting the flag) - without implying an implementation.
> >
> > Initially system suspend problems had been discussed at
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211002005954.1367653-8-l.stach@pengutronix.de/
> > which led to discussing the pmic that contains the regulators which
> > serve as power-domain power-supplies:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/573166b75e524517782471c2b7f96e03fd93d175.camel@puri.sm/T/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > index 5a2e0232862e..58376752a4de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static const struct genpd_lock_ops genpd_spin_ops = {
> > #define genpd_is_active_wakeup(genpd) (genpd->flags & GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP)
> > #define genpd_is_cpu_domain(genpd) (genpd->flags & GENPD_FLAG_CPU_DOMAIN)
> > #define genpd_is_rpm_always_on(genpd) (genpd->flags & GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON)
> > +#define genpd_irq_on(genpd) (genpd->flags & GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_ON)
> >
> > static inline bool irq_safe_dev_in_sleep_domain(struct device *dev,
> > const struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> > @@ -2065,8 +2066,15 @@ int pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> > genpd->domain.ops.runtime_suspend = genpd_runtime_suspend;
> > genpd->domain.ops.runtime_resume = genpd_runtime_resume;
> > genpd->domain.ops.prepare = genpd_prepare;
> > - genpd->domain.ops.suspend_noirq = genpd_suspend_noirq;
> > - genpd->domain.ops.resume_noirq = genpd_resume_noirq;
> > +
> > + if (genpd_irq_on(genpd)) {
> > + genpd->domain.ops.suspend = genpd_suspend_noirq;
> > + genpd->domain.ops.resume = genpd_resume_noirq;
> > + } else {
> > + genpd->domain.ops.suspend_noirq = genpd_suspend_noirq;
> > + genpd->domain.ops.resume_noirq = genpd_resume_noirq;
>
> As we discussed previously, I am thinking that it may be better to
> move to using genpd->domain.ops.suspend_late and
> genpd->domain.ops.resume_early instead.
Should I take this as a change request?
> Beside this, I think the $subject patch looks good to me.
Or not?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-26 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-26 8:32 [PATCH v6 0/2] power: domain: handle power supplies that need interrupts Martin Kepplinger
2022-07-26 8:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] power: domain: handle genpd correctly when needing interrupts Martin Kepplinger
2022-07-26 15:07 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-07-26 18:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2022-07-28 9:19 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-08-19 9:17 ` Martin Kepplinger
2022-08-19 14:53 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-08-22 8:38 ` Martin Kepplinger
2022-08-24 13:30 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-08-25 7:06 ` Martin Kepplinger
2022-09-23 13:55 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-09-26 9:52 ` Martin Kepplinger
2023-06-21 18:20 ` Martin Kepplinger
2023-06-26 9:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-07-26 8:32 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] soc: imx: gpcv2: fix suspend/resume by setting GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_ON Martin Kepplinger
2022-07-26 15:08 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0hG4+z=ypDudiSnhG1SUxfLv+EFsUGOjQEqUi0EKH3+Rw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=aford173@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@puri.sm \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).