From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] ACPI / scan: Initialize status to ACPI_STA_DEFAULT
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:59:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hvfR=m5GXhSS4Q7DYFS9+BA+EAt9oHOYdxMU-J78dtwQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2f9289d-0adb-e165-a23e-696fe985fda4@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09-08-18 11:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09-08-18 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> I've applied the v4 of this patch and I don't think there are any
>>>> changes from it here.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Correct, there were only changes to the 4th patch in the series.
>>>
>>>> As for the rest of the series I'll wait from comments from Wolfram and
>>>> the other reviewers.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, note if you've taken patch 1 you may also want to take patch 3 which
>>> is an ACPI code cleanup made possible by patch 1 and otherwise is
>>> unrelated.
>>
>>
>> I'm under impression Rafael is going to take entire series (at least
>> for patch 4 I'm expecting to give an Ack).
>
>
> As I mentioned in the coverletter, my idea was to have Rafael take
> patches 1-3 and then merge the 4th patch through the platform/x86
> tree. There are only runtime dependencies between the 2 parts and
> merging them independently should not cause any issues.
I can apply the 4th one too if it is ACKed by everyone with a vested interest.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-09 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-09 9:15 [PATCH v5 0/4] i2c-multi-instantiate pseudo driver Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] ACPI / scan: Initialize status to ACPI_STA_DEFAULT Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 9:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-09 9:39 ` Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 9:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-08-09 9:58 ` Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 9:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-08-09 11:36 ` Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 11:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-08-09 10:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-08-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for fwnodes with multiple i2c devices Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 10:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-08-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ACPI / x86-utils: Remove status workaround from acpi_device_always_present() Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 10:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-08-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] platform/x86: Add ACPI i2c-multi-instantiate pseudo driver Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 9:59 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-08-09 10:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-08-09 11:09 ` Heikki Krogerus
2018-08-09 11:30 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0hvfR=m5GXhSS4Q7DYFS9+BA+EAt9oHOYdxMU-J78dtwQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).