linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
To: "Mika Penttilä" <mika.penttila@nextfour.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86/KASLR: Increase BRK pages for KASLR memory randomization
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:47:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJcbSZFS4Ddt5=QuW+J_p2V4=50VppAgVdydXEjbsTX_e+q7Sg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68119f42-cb1b-fd3e-3820-7cf235e607e5@nextfour.com>

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Mika Penttilä
<mika.penttila@nextfour.com> wrote:
> On 08/08/2016 09:40 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> Default implementation expects 6 pages maximum are needed for low page
>> allocations. If KASLR memory randomization is enabled, the worse case
>> of e820 layout would require 12 pages (no large pages). It is due to the
>> PUD level randomization and the variable e820 memory layout.
>>
>> This bug was found while doing extensive testing of KASLR memory
>> randomization on different type of hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
>> ---
>> Based on next-20160805
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/mm/init.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> index 6209289..3a27e6a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> @@ -130,6 +130,14 @@ void  __init early_alloc_pgt_buf(void)
>>       unsigned long tables = INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE;
>>       phys_addr_t base;
>>
>> +     /*
>> +      * Depending on the machine e860 memory layout and the PUD alignement.
>> +      * We may need twice more pages when KASLR memoy randomization is
>> +      * enabled.
>> +      */
>> +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY))
>> +             tables *= 2;
>> +
>>       base = __pa(extend_brk(tables, PAGE_SIZE));
>>
>>       pgt_buf_start = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>
>
> You should increase the reserve also :
> RESERVE_BRK(early_pgt_alloc, INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE);

Yes, that's right. I will resend v2 changing INIT_PGD_BUF_SIZE.

>
>
> --Mika
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-09 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-08 18:40 [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/KASLR: Fix physical memory calculation on KASLR memory randomization Thomas Garnier
2016-08-08 18:40 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] x86/KASLR: Increase BRK pages for " Thomas Garnier
2016-08-09  4:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-09  4:14     ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-08-09  5:16   ` Mika Penttilä
2016-08-09 14:47     ` Thomas Garnier [this message]
2016-08-09 15:07 ` [lkp] [x86/KASLR] 20067c4c13: kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:26! kernel test robot
2016-08-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/KASLR: Fix physical memory calculation on KASLR memory randomization Thomas Garnier
2016-08-09 16:03   ` Joerg Roedel
2016-08-09 16:30     ` Thomas Garnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJcbSZFS4Ddt5=QuW+J_p2V4=50VppAgVdydXEjbsTX_e+q7Sg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=thgarnie@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aleksey.makarov@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=fabf@skynet.be \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.penttila@nextfour.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).