From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+b591856e0f0139f83023@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] kernel BUG in vma_replace_policy
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 20:53:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpGp2CwGJmmwzK7WdudOyL1CCWVaERRK9qTtNA8SZ365SA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpEAZbtUrwrfqd+PWJv9efVy1HRbqrLUYAP4rYRvk0vWug@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 8:00 PM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 7:09 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 06:20:56PM +0000, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > I think I found the problem and the explanation is much simpler. While
> > > walking the page range, queue_folios_pte_range() encounters an
> > > unmovable page and queue_folios_pte_range() returns 1. That causes a
> > > break from the loop inside walk_page_range() and no more VMAs get
> > > locked. After that the loop calling mbind_range() walks over all VMAs,
> > > even the ones which were skipped by queue_folios_pte_range() and that
> > > causes this BUG assertion.
> > >
> > > Thinking what's the right way to handle this situation (what's the
> > > expected behavior here)...
> > > I think the safest way would be to modify walk_page_range() and make
> > > it continue calling process_vma_walk_lock() for all VMAs in the range
> > > even when __walk_page_range() returns a positive err. Any objection or
> > > alternative suggestions?
> >
> > So we only return 1 here if MPOL_MF_MOVE* & MPOL_MF_STRICT were
> > specified. That means we're going to return an error, no matter what,
> > and there's no point in calling mbind_range(). Right?
> >
> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > @@ -1334,6 +1334,8 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
> > ret = queue_pages_range(mm, start, end, nmask,
> > flags | MPOL_MF_INVERT, &pagelist, true);
> >
> > + if (ret == 1)
> > + ret = -EIO;
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > err = ret;
> > goto up_out;
> >
> > (I don't really understand this code, so it can't be this simple, can
> > it? Why don't we just return -EIO from queue_folios_pte_range() if
> > this is the right answer?)
>
> Yeah, I'm trying to understand the expected behavior of this function
> to make sure we are not missing anything. I tried a simple fix that I
> suggested in my previous email and it works but I want to understand a
> bit more about this function's logic before posting the fix.
So, current functionality is that after queue_pages_range() encounters
an unmovable page, terminates the loop and returns 1, mbind_range()
will still be called for the whole range
(https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/mm/mempolicy.c#L1345),
all pages in the pagelist will be migrated
(https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/mm/mempolicy.c#L1355)
and only after that the -EIO code will be returned
(https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/mm/mempolicy.c#L1362).
So, if we follow Matthew's suggestion we will be altering the current
behavior which I assume is not what we want to do.
The simple fix I was thinking about that would not alter this behavior
is smth like this:
diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
index b7d7e4fcfad7..c37a7e8be4cb 100644
--- a/mm/pagewalk.c
+++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
@@ -493,11 +493,17 @@ int walk_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start,
if (!vma) { /* after the last vma */
walk.vma = NULL;
next = end;
+ if (err)
+ continue;
+
if (ops->pte_hole)
err = ops->pte_hole(start, next, -1, &walk);
} else if (start < vma->vm_start) { /* outside vma */
walk.vma = NULL;
next = min(end, vma->vm_start);
+ if (err)
+ continue;
+
if (ops->pte_hole)
err = ops->pte_hole(start, next, -1, &walk);
} else { /* inside vma */
@@ -505,6 +511,8 @@ int walk_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
long start,
walk.vma = vma;
next = min(end, vma->vm_end);
vma = find_vma(mm, vma->vm_end);
+ if (err)
+ continue;
err = walk_page_test(start, next, &walk);
if (err > 0) {
@@ -520,8 +528,6 @@ int walk_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
long start,
break;
err = __walk_page_range(start, next, &walk);
}
- if (err)
- break;
} while (start = next, start < end);
return err;
}
WDYT?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-14 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-06 1:03 [syzbot] [mm?] kernel BUG in vma_replace_policy syzbot
[not found] ` <20230906061902.591996-1-eadavis@sina.com>
2023-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH] mm: as the same logic with queue_pages_range Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-12 5:20 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-13 9:10 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2023-09-08 18:04 ` [syzbot] [mm?] kernel BUG in vma_replace_policy syzbot
2023-09-12 5:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-12 6:09 ` syzbot
2023-09-12 14:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-12 15:03 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-12 16:00 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-13 16:05 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-13 16:46 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-14 18:20 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-14 19:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-14 20:00 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-14 20:53 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2023-09-14 21:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-14 22:21 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-15 4:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-15 16:09 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-15 18:05 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-16 2:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-18 21:20 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-09-15 18:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-16 2:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-16 1:35 ` Yang Shi
2023-09-16 3:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-18 22:34 ` Yang Shi
2023-09-19 0:34 ` Hugh Dickins
[not found] <20230909034207.5816-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2023-09-09 4:43 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJuCfpGp2CwGJmmwzK7WdudOyL1CCWVaERRK9qTtNA8SZ365SA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=surenb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=syzbot+b591856e0f0139f83023@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).