From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 22/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce boot-parameters to control state component support
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:36:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdK=zZ7OYr9uO0GpoCG5iufe=NKhoWhkkHX0wTbajQNhYSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v99evg2j.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 9:50 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Please provide the architectural document which guarantees that and does
> so in a way that it can be evaluated by the kernel. Have not seen that,
> so it does not exist at all.
>
> Future CPUID attributes are as useful as the tweet of today.
I will do so the moment I am permitted.
I'm fine with dropping patch 22 until it can rely on the assurance of
that architectural feature.
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-26 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-21 18:56 [PATCH v4 00/22] x86: Support Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify the initialization helper to handle both static and dynamic buffers Chang S. Bae
2021-03-10 13:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify state copy helpers " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify address finders " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify the context restore helper " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Add a new variable to indicate dynamic user states Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Add new variables to indicate dynamic xstate buffer size Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Calculate and remember dynamic xstate buffer sizes Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Convert the struct fpu 'state' field to a pointer Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce helpers to manage the xstate buffer dynamically Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Define the scope of the initial xstate data Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update the xstate save function to support dynamic states Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update the xstate buffer address finder " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 13/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update the xstate context copy function " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 14/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Expand the xstate buffer on the first use of dynamic user state Chang S. Bae
2021-03-20 22:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-20 22:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-23 21:01 ` Len Brown
2021-03-24 3:14 ` Liu, Jing2
2021-03-24 21:09 ` Len Brown
2021-03-24 21:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-24 21:30 ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-24 21:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-24 21:58 ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-24 22:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-25 5:12 ` Liu, Jing2
2021-03-25 6:59 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-03-25 7:26 ` Liu, Jing2
2021-03-23 21:52 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-03-24 14:24 ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-29 13:14 ` Len Brown
2021-03-29 13:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-29 15:43 ` Len Brown
2021-03-29 16:06 ` Len Brown
2021-03-29 17:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-29 18:57 ` Len Brown
2021-03-29 18:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-29 22:16 ` Len Brown
2021-03-30 8:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-30 16:38 ` Len Brown
2021-03-26 16:34 ` Jann Horn
2021-03-29 18:14 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 15/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Support ptracer-induced xstate buffer expansion Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 16/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Extend the table to map state components with features Chang S. Bae
2021-03-20 21:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:52 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 17/22] x86/cpufeatures/amx: Enumerate Advanced Matrix Extension (AMX) feature bits Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 18/22] x86/fpu/amx: Define AMX state components and have it used for boot-time checks Chang S. Bae
2021-03-20 21:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:52 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 19/22] x86/fpu/amx: Enable the AMX feature in 64-bit mode Chang S. Bae
2021-03-20 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-23 21:51 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 20/22] selftest/x86/amx: Include test cases for the AMX state management Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 21/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic user state in the signal handling path Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 22/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce boot-parameters to control state component support Chang S. Bae
2021-02-21 19:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-02-21 20:10 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-21 20:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-03-20 20:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-25 22:59 ` Len Brown
2021-03-25 23:10 ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-26 15:27 ` Len Brown
2021-03-26 19:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-26 1:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-26 15:33 ` Len Brown
2021-03-26 15:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-26 17:53 ` Len Brown
2021-03-26 18:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-27 4:53 ` Len Brown
2021-03-27 22:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-29 13:31 ` Len Brown
2021-03-29 14:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-26 18:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-27 4:41 ` Len Brown
2021-03-26 1:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-26 15:36 ` Len Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJvTdK=zZ7OYr9uO0GpoCG5iufe=NKhoWhkkHX0wTbajQNhYSw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).