From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: uniphier: add bindings for UniPhier SoC family
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:57:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQY5cq3K0No0O-qZnVnUvgFOyTARyiujy93EicX2-tG8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171128152541.jdd2k5n5mjpppqxv@rob-hp-laptop>
Hi Rob,
2017-11-29 0:25 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 04:29:10PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> Commit msg?
I will write something to fill the line.
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier.txt | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Perhaps arm/socionext/uniphier.txt instead.
I just recalled that I created the directory,
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier/
So, perhaps, it should go to
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier/uniphier.txt
>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..08d3cf3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/uniphier.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
>> +Socionext UniPhier SoC family
>> +
>> +Required properties in the root node:
>> + - compatible: should contain board and SoC compatible strings
>> +
>> + SoC compatibles:
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-ld4" - LD4 SoC
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-pro4" - Pro4 SoC
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-sld8" - sLD8 SoC
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-pro5" - Pro5 SoC
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-pxs2" - PXs2 SoC
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-ld6b" - LD6b SoC
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-ld11" - LD11 SoC
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-ld20" - LD20 SoC
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-pxs3" - PXs3 SoC
>
> Sort this? Or are these in chronological order?
This is sorted in the chronological order.
I already put some bindings sorted chronologically
(for example, Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/uniphier-clock.txt)
(If the alphabetical sort is highly recommended,
I will do so, but I do not know what to do for the existing ones.)
>> +
>> + Board compatibles:
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-ld4-ref" - LD4 Reference Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-pro4-ref" - Pro4 Reference Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-pro4-ace" - Pro4 Ace Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-pro4-sanji" - Pro4 Sanji Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-sld8-ref" - sLD8 Reference Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-pxs2-gentil" - PXs2 Gentil Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-pxs2-vodka" - PXs2 Vodka Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-ld6b-ref" - LD6b Reference Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-ld11-ref" - LD11 Reference Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-ld11-global" - LD11 Global Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-ld20-ref" - LD20 Reference Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-ld20-global" - LD20 Global Board
>> + - "socionext,uniphier-pxs3-ref" - PXs3 Reference Board
>
> I would group boards by each SoC. Then it clear which board compatibles
> go with each SoC compatible and you don't have to have the SoC name in
> the board compatible.
>
OK, will do.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 7:29 [PATCH] dt-bindings: uniphier: add bindings for UniPhier SoC family Masahiro Yamada
2017-11-28 15:25 ` Rob Herring
2017-11-29 3:57 ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK7LNAQY5cq3K0No0O-qZnVnUvgFOyTARyiujy93EicX2-tG8Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).