* [Question] What is the license of scripts/basic/fixdep.c ?
@ 2019-01-18 8:58 Masahiro Yamada
2019-01-18 10:41 ` Masahiro Yamada
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2019-01-18 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Philippe Ombredanne,
Kai Germaschewski, Kate Stewart, Jiri Olsa
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Kbuild mailing list
Hi.
The comment block of scripts/basic/fixdep.c says as follows:
* Author Kai Germaschewski
* Copyright 2002 by Kai Germaschewski <kai.germaschewski@gmx.de>
*
* This software may be used and distributed according to the terms
* of the GNU General Public License, incorporated herein by reference.
It does not explicitly mention the version of GPL.
In this case, I think the corresponding SPDX tag
is GPL-1.0+ instead of GPL-2.0
Is this correct?
There could be another problem regarding of this.
Commit 9f7ef9854e80 copied scripts/basic/fixdep.c
to tools/build/fixdep.c, but it ripped off its license term.
Later, it was tagged as GPL-2.0 by b24413180
See 'git show b24413180 -- tools/build/fixdep.c'
Maybe tools/build/fixdep.c should be corrected to GPL-1.0+ ?
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Question] What is the license of scripts/basic/fixdep.c ?
2019-01-18 8:58 [Question] What is the license of scripts/basic/fixdep.c ? Masahiro Yamada
@ 2019-01-18 10:41 ` Masahiro Yamada
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2019-01-18 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Philippe Ombredanne,
Kai Germaschewski, Kate Stewart, Jiri Olsa
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Kbuild mailing list
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:58 PM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
>
> The comment block of scripts/basic/fixdep.c says as follows:
>
>
> * Author Kai Germaschewski
> * Copyright 2002 by Kai Germaschewski <kai.germaschewski@gmx.de>
> *
> * This software may be used and distributed according to the terms
> * of the GNU General Public License, incorporated herein by reference.
>
>
>
> It does not explicitly mention the version of GPL.
>
> In this case, I think the corresponding SPDX tag
> is GPL-1.0+ instead of GPL-2.0
>
> Is this correct?
>
>
>
> There could be another problem regarding of this.
>
>
>
> Commit 9f7ef9854e80 copied scripts/basic/fixdep.c
> to tools/build/fixdep.c, but it ripped off its license term.
>
> Later, it was tagged as GPL-2.0 by b24413180
>
> See 'git show b24413180 -- tools/build/fixdep.c'
>
>
> Maybe tools/build/fixdep.c should be corrected to GPL-1.0+ ?
I am not an expert of software license, but
a little more thought about this
if scripts/basic/fixdep.c is GPL-1.0+,
Probably, either of the following is correct.
Must tools/build/fixdep.c inherit GPL-1.0+
from script/basic/fixdep.c ?
or
Can you choose the license (any in GPL-1.0, GPL-2.0, GPL-3.0,
GPL-1.0+, GPL-2.0+)
for tools/build/fixdep.c at your opinion?
(In this case, Jiri Olsa, the author of commit 9f7ef9854e800)
If the latter is correct, we do not need to fix tools/build/fixdep.c
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-18 10:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-18 8:58 [Question] What is the license of scripts/basic/fixdep.c ? Masahiro Yamada
2019-01-18 10:41 ` Masahiro Yamada
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).