From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>,
Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>,
Joshua Thompson <funaho@jurai.org>, Sam Creasey <sammy@sammy.net>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] timekeeping: remove xtime_update
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:37:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2hY+Vc3S32KKBJj7gUaUFQb4=rKsRJwCwhAbYP7CakzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdU7bn7rzG-0xzr4St1uArGoOhw6dy7HCkrHRvYqM38Wxg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 3:16 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:48 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > There are no more users of xtime_update aside from legacy_timer_tick(),
> > so fold it into that function and remove the declaration.
> >
> > update_process_times() is now only called inside of the kernel/time/
> > code, so the declaration can be moved there.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>
> The comment about xtime_update() in arch/ia64/kernel/time.c needs
> an update.
I think the correct action for ia64 would be to make it a
proper clockevent driver with oneshot support, and remove
the rest of this logic.
I could try to rewrite the comment, but I tried not to touch that
part since I don't understand the logic behind it. Maybe the
ia64 maintainers can comment here why it even tries to skip
a timer tick. Is there a danger of ending up with the timer irq
permanently disabled if the timer_interrupt() function returns
with the itm register in the past, or is this simply about not having
too many interrupts in a row?
> Does the comment about update_process_times() in
> arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c needs an update, too?
I think that one is still technically correct.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-12 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 15:46 [PATCH 00/13] Clean up legacy clock tick users Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 01/13] timekeeping: add CONFIG_LEGACY_TIMER_TICK Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-09 22:18 ` Finn Thain
2020-10-10 20:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-12 13:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 02/13] ia64: convert to legacy_timer_tick Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 03/13] ARM: rpc: use legacy_timer_tick Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 04/13] parisc: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 05/13] m68k: coldfire: use legacy_timer_tick() Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-09 12:53 ` Greg Ungerer
2020-10-09 13:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 06/13] m68k: split heartbeat out of timer function Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-12 13:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 07/13] m68k: sun3/sun3c: use legacy_timer_tick Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-12 13:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 08/13] m68k: m68328: use legacy_timer_tick() Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-12 13:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-12 15:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-12 20:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 09/13] m68k: change remaining timers to legacy_timer_tick Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-12 13:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 10/13] m68k: remove timer_interrupt() function Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-12 13:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 11/13] timekeeping: remove xtime_update Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-12 13:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-12 13:37 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2020-10-12 20:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [PATCH 12/13] timekeeping: default GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS to enabled Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-12 13:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-08 15:46 ` [RFC 13/13] m68k: mac: convert to generic clockevent Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-09 22:21 ` Finn Thain
2020-10-10 18:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-10-15 1:18 ` Finn Thain
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a2ymv79j1edtJ983-VgjtxvT_6co7V0VRnHzcneW+0ZtA@mail.gmail.com>
2020-10-18 0:54 ` Finn Thain
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a3i6cum_9xGgsbxjXXvbRsP8Po5qLZ0Agb3c4gZTKC9GQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-10-23 9:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-25 12:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-11-06 2:52 ` Finn Thain
2020-11-16 23:27 ` Sam Creasey
2020-10-30 0:41 ` Finn Thain
2020-10-30 13:12 ` Greg Ungerer
2020-11-06 3:12 ` Finn Thain
2020-10-12 22:18 ` [PATCH 00/13] Clean up legacy clock tick users Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK8P3a2hY+Vc3S32KKBJj7gUaUFQb4=rKsRJwCwhAbYP7CakzA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=funaho@jurai.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=philb@gnu.org \
--cc=sammy@sammy.net \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).