linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
	Lyra Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add new reg_update_bits() support
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 11:52:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3rFKVukWk7U1abHnW4a-5TV4e57f=9Lt9Xbfytm7H09A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADBw62qEfdLM9e2oyPKz1qRk4mZaFPbXRYpLfVHzxKj0Cz90kw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:40 AM Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com> wrote:

> > It would be nice in theory to move the sigmatel devices over to
> > reg_update_bits() in theory, but this seems unlikely to actually happen,
> > given that these are mostly obsolete drivers at this point.
>
> I checked all sigmatel devices (about 10 drivers), I think there will
> be more work to change them to use syscon/regmap when changing to
> reg_update_bits(). I am afraid I can not thelp to convert them without
> a hardware, and as you said, some drivers are already dead. So I think
> it would be nice if the driver owners can help to convert these
> drivers, if we get a consensus about the reg_update_bits()
> implementation at last.

Thanks for taking a closer look. I didn't want to imply that you should
fix them, just saying that it might have been nice if they had been
done like this in the first place. Of course, when the drivers were
written, we did not even have the regmap-mmio helpers at all.

      Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-09  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-09  8:57 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add new reg_update_bits() support Baolin Wang
2020-04-09  8:57 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mfd: syscon: Add reg_update_bits() callback support Baolin Wang
2020-04-09 10:48   ` Mark Brown
2020-04-09 14:13     ` Baolin Wang
2020-04-09 14:27       ` Mark Brown
2020-04-10  2:15         ` Baolin Wang
2020-04-09  8:57 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] regmap: Add reg_update_bits() support Baolin Wang
2020-04-09 10:45   ` Mark Brown
2020-04-09 14:12     ` Baolin Wang
2020-04-09 14:26       ` Mark Brown
2020-04-10  2:55         ` Baolin Wang
2020-04-09  8:57 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] soc: sprd: Add Spreadtrum special bits updating support Baolin Wang
2020-04-09  9:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add new reg_update_bits() support Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-09  9:40   ` Baolin Wang
2020-04-09  9:52     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2020-04-09  9:56       ` Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK8P3a3rFKVukWk7U1abHnW4a-5TV4e57f=9Lt9Xbfytm7H09A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).