linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ethan Zhao <xerces.zhao@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@intel.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Oliver <oohall@gmail.com>,
	ruscur@russell.cc, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>,
	Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jia, Pei P" <pei.p.jia@intel.com>,
	ashok.raj@linux.intel.com,
	Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 V2] PCI: define a function to check and wait till port finish DPC handling
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:32:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKF3qh3gVoSfCg+83Kgrq4Pu4f6pSd2TUo+5XwTRZW4qTrkN2A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200927062359.GA23452@infradead.org>

Fixed this concern by moving the function to DPC driver and its
declaration to pci.h.  see v5

Thanks,
Ethan

On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 2:27 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_DPC
> > +static inline bool pci_wait_port_outdpc(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > +     u16 cap = pdev->dpc_cap, status;
> > +     u16 loop = 0;
> > +
> > +     if (!cap) {
> > +             pci_WARN_ONCE(pdev, !cap, "No DPC capability initiated\n");
> > +             return false;
> > +     }
> > +     pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS, &status);
> > +     pci_dbg(pdev, "DPC status %x, cap %x\n", status, cap);
> > +     while (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER && loop < 100) {
> > +             msleep(10);
> > +             loop++;
> > +             pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS, &status);
> > +     }
> > +     if (!(status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER)) {
> > +             pci_dbg(pdev, "Out of DPC %x, cost %d ms\n", status, loop*10);
> > +             return true;
> > +     }
> > +     pci_dbg(pdev, "Timeout to wait port out of DPC status\n");
> > +     return false;
> > +}
>
> I don't think that there is any good reason to have this as an
> inline function.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-29  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-27  3:28 [PATCH 0/5 V2] Fix DPC hotplug race and enhance error handling Ethan Zhao
2020-09-27  3:28 ` [PATCH 1/5 V2] PCI: define a function to check and wait till port finish DPC handling Ethan Zhao
2020-09-27  6:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-27  6:43     ` Zhao, Haifeng
2020-09-29  2:32     ` Ethan Zhao [this message]
2020-09-27  3:28 ` [PATCH 2/5 V2] PCI: pciehp: check and wait port status out of DPC before handling DLLSC and PDC Ethan Zhao
2020-09-27 15:27   ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-28  2:01     ` Zhao, Haifeng
2020-09-28 11:10       ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-28 16:43         ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-28 16:44           ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-09-29  2:28             ` Ethan Zhao
2020-09-29  2:50           ` Ethan Zhao
2020-09-29  8:18     ` Lukas Wunner
2020-09-29  9:46       ` Ethan Zhao
2020-09-29 10:07         ` Lukas Wunner
2020-09-30  2:20           ` Ethan Zhao
2020-09-27  3:28 ` [PATCH 3/5 V2] PCI/ERR: get device before call device driver to avoid NULL pointer reference Ethan Zhao
2020-09-27  3:28 ` [PATCH 4/5 V2] PCI: only return true when dev io state is really changed Ethan Zhao
2020-09-27  4:16   ` Joe Perches
2020-09-27  5:12     ` Zhao, Haifeng
2020-09-27  3:28 ` [PATCH 5/5 V2] PCI/ERR: don't mix io state not changed and no driver together Ethan Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKF3qh3gVoSfCg+83Kgrq4Pu4f6pSd2TUo+5XwTRZW4qTrkN2A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xerces.zhao@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=haifeng.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=pei.p.jia@intel.com \
    --cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).