linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Calling queue_work() multiple times with the same work_struct
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 08:39:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKf6xptjmd9BMuiKpRgj1YyyR97gGXKgYgj-4CKaTvBk4+FeoA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

I'm looking for clarification of the behavior of queue_work().  From
the header description, I'm not sure if I need additional complexity
for re-queuing work.

I want to ensure the following cases all occur when calling queue_work().
1) work_struct not queued -> work_struct queued
2) work_struct queued -> work_struct queued (no change)
3) work_struct running -> work_struct queued (so it will run again)

1 & 2 look supported from workqueue.h.  Is the 3rd case true and
guaranteed?  Is it okay to re-use the same work_struct in that case
while it's being executed?  A work_struct function can re-queue
itself, so I hope #3 is supported.

The virtual device I'm working on has a single interrupt shared for
multiple rings.  So whenever an interrupt occurs, I need to re-queue
the single work_struct on the workqueue to ensure we don't miss an
event.  That is, we need to re-iterate all the rings if the interrupt
comes halfway through processing the list of rings.  If multiple
interrupts come through while running, we only need to re-queue a
single work item for all of them.

Below is what I hope works for the code to give something tangible.

Thank you,
Jason

DECLARE_WORK(argo_work, argo_work_fn);
static struct workqueue_struct *argo_wq = alloc_workqueue("argo_wq",
                    WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE | WQ_SYSFS, 1);

static void argo_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
    argo_interrupt_rx();  /* iterates multiple "rings" */
    argo_notify();
}

static irqreturn_t argo_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
    queue_work(argo_wq, &argo_work);

    return IRQ_HANDLED;
}

             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20 12:39 Jason Andryuk [this message]
2021-05-20 17:01 ` Calling queue_work() multiple times with the same work_struct Tejun Heo
2021-05-20 17:31   ` Jason Andryuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKf6xptjmd9BMuiKpRgj1YyyR97gGXKgYgj-4CKaTvBk4+FeoA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jandryuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).