From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Calling queue_work() multiple times with the same work_struct
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 13:01:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKaV5ej3WrUJQa7/@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKf6xptjmd9BMuiKpRgj1YyyR97gGXKgYgj-4CKaTvBk4+FeoA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, Jason.
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 08:39:56AM -0400, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> 1 & 2 look supported from workqueue.h. Is the 3rd case true and
> guaranteed? Is it okay to re-use the same work_struct in that case
Yes.
> while it's being executed? A work_struct function can re-queue
Yes.
> itself, so I hope #3 is supported.
Yes.
> DECLARE_WORK(argo_work, argo_work_fn);
> static struct workqueue_struct *argo_wq = alloc_workqueue("argo_wq",
> WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE | WQ_SYSFS, 1);
I don't know what the device is but does it need both HIGHPRI and
CPU_INTENSIVE?
> static void argo_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> argo_interrupt_rx(); /* iterates multiple "rings" */
> argo_notify();
> }
>
> static irqreturn_t argo_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> queue_work(argo_wq, &argo_work);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
Yeah, the above will guarantee that the work function would run at least
once since the last invocation of argo_interrupt().
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 12:39 Calling queue_work() multiple times with the same work_struct Jason Andryuk
2021-05-20 17:01 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2021-05-20 17:31 ` Jason Andryuk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKaV5ej3WrUJQa7/@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=jandryuk@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).