From: Alex Forster <aforster@cloudflare.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Kyle Bowman <kbowman@cloudflare.com>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_NFLOG: allow 128 character log prefixes
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:45:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKxSbF1cxKOLTFNZG40HLN-gAYnYM+8dXH_04vQ8+v3KXdAq8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727215240.GA25043@salvia>
> Yes, you can update iptables-nft to use nft_log instead of xt_LOG,
> that requires no kernel upgrades and it will work with older kernels.
I've always been under the impression that mixing xtables and nftables
was impossible. Forgive me, but I just want to clarify one more time:
you're saying we should be able to modify iptables-nft such that the
following rule will use xt_bpf to match a packet and then nft_log to
log it, rather than xt_log as it does today?
iptables-nft -A test-chain -d 11.22.33.44/32 -m bpf --bytecode
"1,6 0 0 65536" -j NFLOG --nflog-prefix
"0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789"
We had some unexplained performance loss when we were evaluating
switching to iptables-nft, but if this sort of mixing is possible then
it is certainly worth reevaluating.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 19:00 [PATCH] netfilter: xt_NFLOG: allow 128 character log prefixes Kyle Bowman
2021-07-27 19:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-07-27 20:06 ` Alex Forster
2021-07-27 21:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-07-27 21:22 ` Alex Forster
2021-07-27 21:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-07-27 21:44 ` Alex Forster
2021-07-27 21:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-07-27 22:45 ` Alex Forster [this message]
2021-07-27 23:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-07-28 1:43 ` [netfilter-core] " Phil Sutter
2021-07-30 18:27 ` Kyle Bowman
2021-08-01 14:14 ` Jeremy Sowden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKxSbF1cxKOLTFNZG40HLN-gAYnYM+8dXH_04vQ8+v3KXdAq8Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=aforster@cloudflare.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kbowman@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).