linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	jing2.liu@intel.com, "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Expand dynamic user state area on first use
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:39:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWKMYcuyohpctb1SoDueU1-nwAtrirJbdJTp4tZwCMXZA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201001203913.9125-14-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 1:43 PM Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Intel's Extended Feature Disable (XFD) feature is an extension of the XSAVE
> architecture. XFD allows the kernel to enable a feature state in XCR0 and
> to receive a #NM trap when a task uses instructions accessing that state.
> In this way, Linux can allocate the large task->fpu buffer only for tasks
> that use it.
>
> XFD introduces two MSRs: IA32_XFD to enable/disable the feature and
> IA32_XFD_ERR to assist the #NM trap handler. Both use the same
> state-component bitmap format, used by XCR0.
>
> Use this hardware capability to find the right time to expand xstate area.
> Introduce two sets of helper functions for that:
>
> 1. The first set is primarily for interacting with the XFD hardware
>    feature. Helpers for configuring disablement, e.g. in context switching,
>    are:
>         xdisable_setbits()
>         xdisable_getbits()
>         xdisable_switch()
>
> 2. The second set is for managing the first-use status and handling #NM
>    trap:
>         xfirstuse_enabled()
>         xfirstuse_not_detected()
>         xfirstuse_event_handler()
>
> The #NM handler induces the xstate area expansion to save the first-used
> states.
>
> No functional change until the kernel enables dynamic user states and XFD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h  |  1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h    |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c          | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c        | 34 ++++++++++++++++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c           |  5 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c        |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c        |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c             |  3 ++
>  9 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index 2901d5df4366..7d7fe1d82966 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@
>  #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEC             (10*32+ 1) /* XSAVEC instruction */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_XGETBV1            (10*32+ 2) /* XGETBV with ECX = 1 instruction */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_XSAVES             (10*32+ 3) /* XSAVES/XRSTORS instructions */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_XFD                        (10*32+ 4) /* eXtended Feature Disabling */
>
>  /*
>   * Extended auxiliary flags: Linux defined - for features scattered in various
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
> index 3b03ead87a46..f5dbbaa060fb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
> @@ -572,11 +572,60 @@ static inline void switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, int cpu)
>   * Misc helper functions:
>   */
>
> +/* The first-use detection helpers: */
> +
> +static inline void xdisable_setbits(u64 value)
> +{
> +       wrmsrl_safe(MSR_IA32_XFD, value);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 xdisable_getbits(void)
> +{
> +       u64 value;
> +
> +       rdmsrl_safe(MSR_IA32_XFD, &value);
> +       return value;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 xfirstuse_enabled(void)
> +{
> +       /* All the dynamic user components are first-use enabled. */
> +       return xfeatures_mask_user_dynamic;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Convert fpu->firstuse_bv to xdisable configuration in MSR IA32_XFD.
> + * xdisable_setbits() only uses this.
> + */
> +static inline u64 xfirstuse_not_detected(struct fpu *fpu)
> +{
> +       u64 firstuse_bv = (fpu->state_mask & xfirstuse_enabled());
> +
> +       /*
> +        * If first-use is not detected, set the bit. If the detection is
> +        * not enabled, the bit is always zero in firstuse_bv. So, make
> +        * following conversion:
> +        */
> +       return  (xfirstuse_enabled() ^ firstuse_bv);
> +}
> +
> +/* Update MSR IA32_XFD based on fpu->firstuse_bv */
> +static inline void xdisable_switch(struct fpu *prev, struct fpu *next)
> +{
> +       if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XFD) || !xfirstuse_enabled())
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (unlikely(prev->state_mask != next->state_mask))
> +               xdisable_setbits(xfirstuse_not_detected(next));
> +}
> +
> +bool xfirstuse_event_handler(struct fpu *fpu);
> +
>  /*
>   * Load PKRU from the FPU context if available. Delay loading of the
>   * complete FPU state until the return to userland.
>   */
> -static inline void switch_fpu_finish(struct fpu *new_fpu)
> +static inline void switch_fpu_finish(struct fpu *old_fpu, struct fpu *new_fpu)
>  {
>         u32 pkru_val = init_pkru_value;
>         struct pkru_state *pk;
> @@ -586,6 +635,8 @@ static inline void switch_fpu_finish(struct fpu *new_fpu)
>
>         set_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD);
>
> +       xdisable_switch(old_fpu, new_fpu);
> +
>         if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE))
>                 return;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 2859ee4f39a8..0ccbe8cc99ad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -610,6 +610,8 @@
>  #define MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS_RSVD          0x00000ffc
>
>  #define MSR_IA32_XSS                   0x00000da0
> +#define MSR_IA32_XFD                   0x000001c4
> +#define MSR_IA32_XFD_ERR               0x000001c5
>
>  #define MSR_IA32_APICBASE              0x0000001b
>  #define MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BSP          (1<<8)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> index ece6428ba85b..2e07bfcd54b3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> @@ -518,3 +518,40 @@ int fpu__exception_code(struct fpu *fpu, int trap_nr)
>          */
>         return 0;
>  }
> +
> +bool xfirstuse_event_handler(struct fpu *fpu)
> +{
> +       bool handled = false;
> +       u64 event_mask;
> +
> +       /* Check whether the first-use detection is running. */
> +       if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XFD) || !xfirstuse_enabled())
> +               return handled;
> +
> +       rdmsrl_safe(MSR_IA32_XFD_ERR, &event_mask);

NAK.

MSR_IA32_XFD_ERR needs to be wired up in the exception handler, not in
some helper called farther down the stack

But this raises an interesting point -- what happens if allocation
fails?  I think that, from kernel code, we simply cannot support this
exception mechanism.  If kernel code wants to use AMX (and that would
be very strange indeed), it should call x86_i_am_crazy_amx_begin() and
handle errors, not rely on exceptions.  From user code, I assume we
send a signal if allocation fails.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-01 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-01 20:38 [RFC PATCH 00/22] x86: Support Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 01/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify area init helper prototypes to access all the possible areas Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 02/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify xstate copy " Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 03/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify address finder " Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 04/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify save and restore helper " Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 05/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce a new variable for dynamic user states Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 06/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Outline dynamic xstate area size in the task context Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 07/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce helpers to manage an xstate area dynamically Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 23:41   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-13 22:00     ` Brown, Len
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 08/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Define the scope of the initial xstate data Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 09/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce wrapper functions for organizing xstate area access Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 10/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update xstate save function for supporting dynamic user xstate Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 11/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update xstate area address finder " Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 12/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update xstate context copy function for supporting dynamic area Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 13/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Expand dynamic user state area on first use Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 23:39   ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2020-10-13 22:31     ` Brown, Len
2020-10-13 22:43       ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-14  1:11         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-14  6:03           ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-14 16:10             ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-14 16:29               ` Dave Hansen
2020-11-03 21:32                 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-11-03 21:41                   ` Dave Hansen
2020-11-03 21:53                     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-10-14 10:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-14  1:47       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 14/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Inherit dynamic user state when used in the parent Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 15/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Support ptracer-induced xstate area expansion Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 16/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic user state in the signal handling path Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 17/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Extend the table for mapping xstate components with features Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 18/22] x86/cpufeatures/amx: Enumerate Advanced Matrix Extension (AMX) feature bits Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 19/22] x86/fpu/amx: Define AMX state components and have it used for boot-time checks Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 20/22] x86/fpu/amx: Enable the AMX feature in 64-bit mode Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 21/22] selftest/x86/amx: Include test cases for the AMX state management Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 22/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce boot-parameters for control some state component support Chang S. Bae
2020-10-02  2:09   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-13 23:00     ` Brown, Len
2020-10-02 17:15   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-02 17:26     ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-13 23:38     ` Brown, Len
2020-10-02 17:25   ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALCETrWKMYcuyohpctb1SoDueU1-nwAtrirJbdJTp4tZwCMXZA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).