From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
To: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: Support guest MAXPHYADDR < host MAXPHYADDR
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 09:30:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALMp9eRfZ50iyrED0-LU75VWhHu_kVoB2Qw55VzEFzZ=0QCGow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200710154811.418214-1-mgamal@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:48 AM Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> When EPT is enabled, KVM does not really look at guest physical
> address size. Address bits above maximum physical memory size are reserved.
> Because KVM does not look at these guest physical addresses, it currently
> effectively supports guest physical address sizes equal to the host.
>
> This can be problem when having a mixed setup of machines with 5-level page
> tables and machines with 4-level page tables, as live migration can change
> MAXPHYADDR while the guest runs, which can theoretically introduce bugs.
Huh? Changing MAXPHYADDR while the guest runs should be illegal. Or
have I missed some peculiarity of LA57 that makes MAXPHYADDR a dynamic
CPUID information field?
> In this patch series we add checks on guest physical addresses in EPT
> violation/misconfig and NPF vmexits and if needed inject the proper
> page faults in the guest.
>
> A more subtle issue is when the host MAXPHYADDR is larger than that of the
> guest. Page faults caused by reserved bits on the guest won't cause an EPT
> violation/NPF and hence we also check guest MAXPHYADDR and add PFERR_RSVD_MASK
> error code to the page fault if needed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-10 15:48 [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: Support guest MAXPHYADDR < host MAXPHYADDR Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: x86: Add helper functions for illegal GPA checking and page fault injection Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] KVM: x86: mmu: Move translate_gpa() to mmu.c Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] KVM: x86: mmu: Add guest physical address check in translate_gpa() Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 17:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] KVM: x86: rename update_bp_intercept to update_exception_bitmap Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 16:15 ` Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] KVM: x86: update exception bitmap on CPUID changes Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 16:25 ` Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] KVM: VMX: introduce vmx_need_pf_intercept Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM: VMX: Add guest physical address check in EPT violation and misconfig Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-13 18:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-15 23:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-08-17 17:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-08-17 18:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-09 16:17 ` Jim Mattson
2020-10-14 23:44 ` Jim Mattson
2020-10-23 3:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-23 9:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-23 16:59 ` Jim Mattson
2020-10-23 17:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-23 17:23 ` Jim Mattson
2020-10-23 17:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-15 19:35 ` Jim Mattson
2021-01-20 21:16 ` Jim Mattson
2021-01-27 20:57 ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-21 18:31 ` Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: VMX: optimize #PF injection when MAXPHYADDR does not match Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 15:48 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: x86: SVM: VMX: Make GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR support configurable Mohammed Gamal
2020-07-10 17:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-10 16:30 ` Jim Mattson [this message]
2020-07-10 17:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: Support guest MAXPHYADDR < host MAXPHYADDR Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-10 17:13 ` Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 17:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-10 17:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-10 17:26 ` Jim Mattson
2020-07-10 17:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-10 17:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALMp9eRfZ50iyrED0-LU75VWhHu_kVoB2Qw55VzEFzZ=0QCGow@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgamal@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).