[PATCH] dt-bindings: fix warnings in validation of qcom,gcc.yaml

[PATCH] dt-bindings: fix warnings in validation of qcom,gcc.yaml

[Dafna Hirschfeld]

The last example in qcom,gcc.yaml set 'sleep' as the second
value of 'clock-names'. According to the schema is should
be 'sleep_clk'. Fix the example to conform the schema.
This fixes a warning when validating the schema:
"clock-names:  ... is not valid under any of the given schemas"

Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
---
I tested this patch on top of the patch
"dt-binding: fix compilation error of the example in qcom,gcc.yaml"
which fixes a compilation error in this file

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
index 50ff07f80acb..cac1150c9292 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ examples:
                <0>,
                <0>;
       clock-names = "xo",
-                    "sleep",
+                    "sleep_clk",
                     "usb3_pipe",
                     "ufs_rx_symbol0",
                     "ufs_rx_symbol1",
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: fix warnings in validation of qcom,gcc.yaml

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:57 AM Dafna Hirschfeld
<dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> The last example in qcom,gcc.yaml set 'sleep' as the second
> value of 'clock-names'. According to the schema is should
> be 'sleep_clk'. Fix the example to conform the schema.
> This fixes a warning when validating the schema:
> "clock-names:  ... is not valid under any of the given schemas"
>
> Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>

Fixes: d109ea0970cf ("dt-bindings: clock: Document external clocks for
MSM8998 gcc")
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: fix warnings in validation of qcom,gcc.yaml

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Dafna Hirschfeld (2020-01-22 05:57:41)
> The last example in qcom,gcc.yaml set 'sleep' as the second
> value of 'clock-names'. According to the schema is should
> be 'sleep_clk'. Fix the example to conform the schema.
> This fixes a warning when validating the schema:
> "clock-names:  ... is not valid under any of the given schemas"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
> ---

Applied to clk-next