From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] perf parse-event: Fix cpu map leaks
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 23:39:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chORRmiE2R4LnzGh0uS2nKqL_tk+qxV2TfeqZctvCsJ5w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915121814.GE720847@kernel.org>
Hi Arnaldo,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:18 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:18:12PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > Like evlist cpu map, evsel's cpu map should have proper refcount by
> > releasing the original count after creation.
>
> "releasing original count after creation"?
>
> There are two fixes here, one its legit, i.e. when failing to create
> the new evsel, if you created the perf_cpu_map, drop the refcount,
> which, in this case, will free it since perf_cpu_map__new() sets it to
> 1.
>
> But what about the other? Humm, I see, since a new refcount is being
> obtained, then we need to drop the first.
>
> This all got complicated, perhaps the following patch is simpler?
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> index c4d2394e2b2dc60f..3dceeacf8669bc5d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> @@ -353,18 +353,20 @@ __add_event(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
> const char *cpu_list)
> {
> struct evsel *evsel;
> - struct perf_cpu_map *cpus = pmu ? pmu->cpus :
> + struct perf_cpu_map *cpus = pmu ? perf_cpu_map__get(pmu->cpus) :
> cpu_list ? perf_cpu_map__new(cpu_list) : NULL;
>
> if (init_attr)
> event_attr_init(attr);
>
> evsel = evsel__new_idx(attr, *idx);
> - if (!evsel)
> + if (!evsel) {
> + perf_cpu_map__put(cpus);
> return NULL;
> + }
>
> (*idx)++;
> - evsel->core.cpus = perf_cpu_map__get(cpus);
> + evsel->core.cpus = cpus;
> evsel->core.own_cpus = perf_cpu_map__get(cpus);
> evsel->core.system_wide = pmu ? pmu->is_uncore : false;
> evsel->auto_merge_stats = auto_merge_stats;
>
>
> ---
>
> I.e. if we're going to share pmu->cpus, grab the necessary refcount at
> that point, if we're going to create one (pmu == NULL), then
> perf_cpu_map__new() will have the refcount we need (will set it to 1).
>
> Then, if we fail to create the new evsel, we just drop the refcount we
> got either from perf_cpu_map__get(pmu->cpus) or from
> perf_cpu_map__new(cpu_list) (NULL is ok for __put() operations, that
> covers that last ': NULL').
>
> And then, when we go make evsel->core.cpus share that cpu_map, we know
> we have the necessary refcount already, right?
Indeed! This looks a lot better. Do you want me to resend?
Thanks
Namhyung
>
> No need to later on drop the one obtained previously via:
>
> evsel->core.cpus = perf_cpu_map__get(cpus);
>
> And we don't need to drop it later when we want to drop the extra
> refcount it gets when pmu == NULL.
>
> - Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 3:18 [PATCHSET v2 00/11] perf tools: Fix various memory leaks Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf metric: Fix some " Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 11:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf metric: Fix some memory leaks - part 2 Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 11:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf evlist: Fix cpu/thread map leak Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] perf parse-event: Fix cpu map leaks Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 14:39 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2020-09-15 16:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] perf parse-event: Fix memory leak in evsel->unit Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 18:59 ` Ian Rogers
2020-09-15 19:56 ` David Malcolm
2020-09-16 7:12 ` Namhyung Kim
2020-09-16 18:37 ` Ian Rogers
2020-09-15 20:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 06/11] perf test: Fix memory leaks in parse-metric test Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 07/11] perf metric: Release expr_parse_ctx after testing Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 08/11] perf metric: Free metric when it failed to resolve Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 09/11] perf metric: Do not free metric when " Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] perf test: Free aliases for PMU event map aliases test Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 7:37 ` John Garry
2020-09-15 11:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 11/11] perf test: Free formats for perf pmu parse test Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 5:15 ` [PATCHSET v2 00/11] perf tools: Fix various memory leaks Ian Rogers
2020-09-15 14:49 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAM9d7chORRmiE2R4LnzGh0uS2nKqL_tk+qxV2TfeqZctvCsJ5w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).