Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the gpio-brgl tree

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>]

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:04 PM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 7:41 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The following commit is also in the mfd tree as A different commit
> > > (but the same patch):
> > >
> > >   4a7b0850fc7a ("dt-bindings: cros-ec: Add properties for GPIO controller")
> > >
> > > This is commit
> > >
> > >   7b79740d42e7 ("dt-bindings: mfd: cros-ec: Add properties for GPIO controller")
> > >
> > > in the mfd tree.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > Hi Stephen, Lee!
> >
> > I picked it up because I was already queuing the patch adding the GPIO
> > driver. Unless there are conflicts with the MFD branch (doesn't seem
> > like it?), I think it should go through the GPIO branch together with
> > the driver.
>
> This is the first I've heard of it.  There was no reply from you, even
> after I specifically asked you for an explanation.
>

Huh, I now see your email in lore[1] but I don't have it in my inbox,
not even in spam. I would have answered otherwise.

> There is no convincing reason for this to follow the C change.  It's
> more important to avoid Linus from facing merge-conflicts during the
> merge-window. Please remove the patch from your tree.
>

This is why I'm asking if this caused a conflict. Whatever, I'll drop
it alright.

Bartosz

> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240223102039.GK10170@google.com/