Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: mvebu: use platform_irq_count

[Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>]

śr., 4 gru 2019 o 19:47 Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> napisał(a):
>
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 05:33:04PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > śr., 4 gru 2019 o 08:24 Uwe Kleine-König
> > <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 04:20:41AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > >
> > > > platform_irq_count() is the more generic way (independent of
> > > > device trees) to determine the count of available interrupts. So
> > > > use this instead.
> > > >
> > > > As platform_irq_count() might return an error code (which
> > > > of_irq_count doesn't) some additional handling is necessary.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > Reviewed-and-Commit-Log-Provided-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> >
> > This is not a valid tag, but I take it as Suggested-by and Reviewed-by. :)
>
> If you care about the validity of such tags, I suggest you take a look
> at the output of
>
>         $ git rev-list v4.0..v5.4 | while read rev; do git cat-file commit $rev; done | sed -n 's/ *\(.*-by\):.*/\1/p' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
>
> (which finds all tags used between 4.0 and 5.4 with its usage count).
>
> A few of the tags (admittedly with low usage count :-) included there are:
>
>   Badly-reviewed-by
>   Bonus-points-awarded-by
>   Compile-tested and Reviewed-by
>   Enthusiastically-Acked-by
>   Mea-culpa-by
>   \o/-by
>   Brown-paper-bag-by
>
> Best regards
> Uwe

I am well aware of this and there has been a discussion on LKML some
time ago (I can no longer find it though) about introducing stricter
rules for tags. I don't remember the outcome either though.

Bart