[PATCH] gpio: gpio-da9052: remove platform_set_drvdata() + cleanup probe

[PATCH] gpio: gpio-da9052: remove platform_set_drvdata() + cleanup probe

[Alexandru Ardelean]

The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back
the private information.
Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it.

If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on
devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as
there are other ways to log/see this during probe

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c
index 9aa59afdcbbf..559188d80c2b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c
@@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ static int da9052_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct da9052_gpio *gpio;
 	struct da9052_pdata *pdata;
-	int ret;
 
 	gpio = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!gpio)
@@ -209,15 +208,7 @@ static int da9052_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (pdata && pdata->gpio_base)
 		gpio->gp.base = pdata->gpio_base;
 
-	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &gpio->gp, gpio);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio);
-
-	return 0;
+	return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &gpio->gp, gpio);
 }
 
 static struct platform_driver da9052_gpio_driver = {
-- 
2.31.1

Re: [PATCH] gpio: gpio-da9052: remove platform_set_drvdata() + cleanup probe

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:14 PM Alexandru Ardelean
<aardelean@deviqon.com> wrote:
>
> The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back
> the private information.
> Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it.
>
> If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on
> devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as
> there are other ways to log/see this during probe
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c | 11 +----------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c
> index 9aa59afdcbbf..559188d80c2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c
> @@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ static int da9052_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct da9052_gpio *gpio;
>         struct da9052_pdata *pdata;
> -       int ret;
>
>         gpio = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!gpio)
> @@ -209,15 +208,7 @@ static int da9052_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (pdata && pdata->gpio_base)
>                 gpio->gp.base = pdata->gpio_base;
>
> -       ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &gpio->gp, gpio);
> -       if (ret < 0) {
> -               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
> -               return ret;
> -       }
> -
> -       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio);
> -
> -       return 0;
> +       return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &gpio->gp, gpio);
>  }
>
>  static struct platform_driver da9052_gpio_driver = {
> --
> 2.31.1
>

Applied, thanks!

Bart