Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] mfd: da9063: Add custom IRQ map for DA9063L

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] mfd: da9063: Add custom IRQ map for DA9063L
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 09:54:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdU3ctFuSXsGAxHJyxPkFEeqm+WrWj7HrKFCKs32asWcYw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180605074727.GL21163@dell>

Hi Lee,

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> While the datasheet for DA9063L (2v1, 23-Mar-2017) lists the RTC register
>> block, the DA9063L does not have an RTC. Add custom IRQ map for DA9063L to
>> ignore the Alarm and Tick IRQs from the PMIC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>

>> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
>> @@ -74,8 +74,55 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip da9063_irq_chip = {
>>       .init_ack_masked = true,
>>  };
>>
>> +static const struct regmap_irq da9063l_irqs[] = {
>> +     /* DA9063 event A register */
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ONKEY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ONKEY),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ADC_RDY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ADC_RDY),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_SEQ_RDY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_SEQ_RDY),
>> +     /* DA9063 event B register */
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_WAKE, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_WAKE),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_TEMP, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_TEMP),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_COMP_1V2, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_COMP_1V2),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_LDO_LIM, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_LDO_LIM),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_REG_UVOV, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_UVOV),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_DVC_RDY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_DVC_RDY),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_VDD_MON, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_VDD_MON),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_WARN, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_VDD_WARN),
>> +     /* DA9063 event C register */
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI0, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI0),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI1, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI1),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI2, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI2),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI3, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI3),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI4, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI4),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI5, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI5),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI6, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI6),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI7, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI7),
>> +     /* DA9063 event D register */
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI8, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI8),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI9, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI9),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI10, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI10),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI11, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI11),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI12, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI12),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI13, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI13),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI14, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI14),
>> +     REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI15, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI15),
>> +};
>
> Same here.  Please make checkpatch.pl happen, even if it makes the
> code slightly less readable.

I beg to disagree: source code should be optimized for reading.
Checkpatch is a hinting tool, not an absolute check.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds