linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
To: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>,
	Fan Chen <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
	linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor clock control
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:02:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANMq1KCxhnn+fKaxS1RbpYYJ7pcXzD8XkqTBJHiauHbfrYVTGA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190319080140.24055-7-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:02 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Put clock enable and disable control in separate function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> index 765ad4a5e5df..3e9be07a2627 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> @@ -208,6 +208,33 @@ static int scpsys_regulator_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd)
>         return regulator_disable(scpd->supply);
>  }
>
> +static int scpsys_clk_enable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num)
> +{
> +       int i, ret = 0;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < max_num && clk[i]; i++) {
> +               ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk[i]);
> +               if (ret) {
> +                       for (--i; i >= 0; i--)
> +                               clk_disable_unprepare(clk[i]);

Would it be simpler to just call scpsys_clk_disable(clk, i) ?

> +
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}

Maybe not for this series, but could you use clk_bulk_prepare_enable
instead? The only issue is that it'd still call clk_prepare_enable on
NULL clocks, but that does nothing, so it's just a little less
efficient...

> +
> +static void scpsys_clk_disable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +
> +       for (i = max_num - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> +               if (clk[i])

if test not needed, clk_disable_unprepare ignores NULL parameters.

> +                       clk_disable_unprepare(clk[i]);
> +       }
> +}

ditto: clk_bulk_disable_unprepare

> +
>  static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>  {
>         struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
> @@ -216,21 +243,14 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>         u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
>         u32 val;
>         int ret, tmp;
> -       int i;
>
>         ret = scpsys_regulator_enable(scpd);
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       for (i = 0; i < MAX_CLKS && scpd->clk[i]; i++) {
> -               ret = clk_prepare_enable(scpd->clk[i]);
> -               if (ret) {
> -                       for (--i; i >= 0; i--)
> -                               clk_disable_unprepare(scpd->clk[i]);
> -
> -                       goto err_clk;
> -               }
> -       }
> +       ret = scpsys_clk_enable(scpd->clk, MAX_CLKS);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto err_clk;
>
>         val = readl(ctl_addr);
>         val |= PWR_ON_BIT;
> @@ -283,10 +303,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>         return 0;
>
>  err_pwr_ack:
> -       for (i = MAX_CLKS - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> -               if (scpd->clk[i])
> -                       clk_disable_unprepare(scpd->clk[i]);
> -       }
> +       scpsys_clk_disable(scpd->clk, MAX_CLKS);
>  err_clk:
>         scpsys_regulator_disable(scpd);
>
> @@ -303,7 +320,6 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>         u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
>         u32 val;
>         int ret, tmp;
> -       int i;
>
>         if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
>                 ret = mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> @@ -344,8 +360,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 goto out;
>
> -       for (i = 0; i < MAX_CLKS && scpd->clk[i]; i++)
> -               clk_disable_unprepare(scpd->clk[i]);
> +       scpsys_clk_disable(scpd->clk, MAX_CLKS);
>
>         ret = scpsys_regulator_disable(scpd);
>         if (ret < 0)
> --
> 2.18.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-19 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-19  8:01 [PATCH v5 00/14] Mediatek MT8183 scpsys support Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add property to mt8183 smi-common Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] dt-bindings: soc: Add MT8183 power dt-bindings Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] soc: mediatek: Switch to SPDX license identifier Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor polling timeout and documentation Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19 11:45   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:11     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor regulator control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor clock control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19 12:02   ` Nicolas Boichat [this message]
2019-06-19  9:19     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor sram control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19 12:07   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:30     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor bus protection control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19 12:09   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:31     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] soc: mediatek: Add basic_clk_name to scp_power_data Weiyi Lu
2019-03-21  6:02   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:36     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] soc: mediatek: Add multiple step bus protection control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-21  5:57   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:43     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] soc: mediatek: Add subsys clock control for bus protection Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] soc: mediatek: Add MT8183 scpsys support Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] arm64: dts: Add power controller device node of MT8183 Weiyi Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANMq1KCxhnn+fKaxS1RbpYYJ7pcXzD8XkqTBJHiauHbfrYVTGA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=fan.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=weiyi.lu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).