linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	dsahern@kernel.org, Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>,
	kuniyu@amazon.co.jp, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: snmp: add statistics for tcp small queue check
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 07:55:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+nQb7GEAhbRKZKaf=wTk1XcepT6whnk3P8qTZxeAHyow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211130072308.76cc711c@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 7:23 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:36:59 +0800 Menglong Dong wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:57 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 14:01:02 +0800 menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Once tcp small queue check failed in tcp_small_queue_check(), the
> > > > throughput of tcp will be limited, and it's hard to distinguish
> > > > whether it is out of tcp congestion control.
> > > >
> > > > Add statistics of LINUX_MIB_TCPSMALLQUEUEFAILURE for this scene.
> > >
> > > Isn't this going to trigger all the time and alarm users because of the
> > > "Failure" in the TCPSmallQueueFailure name?  Isn't it perfectly fine
> > > for TCP to bake full TSQ amount of data and have it paced out onto the
> > > wire? What's your link speed?
> >
> > Well, it's a little complex. In my case, there is a guest in kvm, and virtio_net
> > is used with napi_tx enabled.
> >
> > With napi_tx enabled, skb won't be orphaned after it is passed to virtio_net,
> > until it is released. The point is that the sending interrupt of
> > virtio_net will be
> > turned off and the skb can't be released until the next net_rx interrupt comes.
> > So, wmem_alloc can't decrease on time, and the bandwidth is limited. When
> > this happens, the bandwidth can decrease from 500M to 10M.
> >
> > In fact, this issue of uapi_tx is fixed in this commit:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210719144949.935298466@linuxfoundation.org/
> >
> > I added this statistics to monitor the sending failure (may be called
> > sending delay)
> > caused by qdisc and net_device. When something happen, maybe users can
> > raise ‘/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_pacing_ss_ratio’ to get better bandwidth.
>
> Sounds very second-order and particular to a buggy driver :/
> Let's see what Eric says but I vote revert.

I did some tests yesterday, using one high speed TCP_STREAM (~90Gbit),
and got plenty of increments when using pfifo_fast qdisc.
Yet seed was nominal (bottleneck is the copyout() cost at receiver)

I got few counter increments when qdisc is fq as expected
(because of commit c73e5807e4f6fc6d "tcp: tsq: no longer use
limit_output_bytes for paced flows")


So this new SNMP counter is not a proxy for the kind of problems that a buggy
driver would trigger.

I also suggest we revert this patch.

Thanks !

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-30 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-28  6:01 [PATCH v2 net-next] net: snmp: add statistics for tcp small queue check menglong8.dong
2021-11-29 13:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-11-29 15:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-29 16:37   ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-30 14:36   ` Menglong Dong
2021-11-30 15:23     ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-30 15:55       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2021-12-01  2:05         ` Menglong Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANn89i+nQb7GEAhbRKZKaf=wTk1XcepT6whnk3P8qTZxeAHyow@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=imagedong@tencent.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).