linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: shuah.khan@hp.com,
	"Christoph Lameter (Open Source)" <cl@linux.com>,
	glommer@parallels.com, js1304@gmail.com,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	shuahkhan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Restructure kmem_cache_create() to move debug cache integrity checks into a new function
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:40:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLFkrNVLhojV=id67xuhXDHyEzZiDo=_peRJtgcfAjC9bg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120815165324.f6e16eee.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:40:18 -0600
> Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@hp.com> wrote:
>
>> kmem_cache_create() does cache integrity checks when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>> is defined. These checks interspersed with the regular code path has
>> lead to compile time warnings when compiled without CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>> defined. Restructuring the code to move the integrity checks in to a new
>> function would eliminate the current compile warning problem and also
>> will allow for future changes to the debug only code to evolve without
>> introducing new warnings in the regular path. This restructuring work
>> is based on the discussion in the following thread:
>
> Your patch appears to be against some ancient old kernel, such as 3.5.
> I did this:
>
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c~mm-slab_commonc-restructure-kmem_cache_create-to-move-debug-cache-integrity-checks-into-a-new-function-fix
> +++ a/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -101,15 +101,8 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(con
>
>         get_online_cpus();
>         mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
> -
> -       if (kmem_cache_sanity_check(name, size))
> -               goto oops;
> -
> -       s = __kmem_cache_create(name, size, align, flags, ctor);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> -oops:
> -#endif
> +       if (kmem_cache_sanity_check(name, size) == 0)
> +               s = __kmem_cache_create(name, size, align, flags, ctor);
>         mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
>         put_online_cpus();

Yup. Shuah, care to spin another version against slab/next?

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-16  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-13 23:12 [PATCH TRIVIAL] mm: Fix build warning in kmem_cache_create() Shuah Khan
2012-07-14  9:18 ` David Rientjes
2012-07-14 12:01   ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-16  3:04     ` Shuah Khan
2012-07-16  9:58       ` David Rientjes
2012-07-16 14:17         ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-16 15:56           ` Shuah Khan
2012-07-16 19:58           ` David Rientjes
2012-07-16 20:14             ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-16 23:48               ` David Rientjes
2012-07-17 14:36                 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-17 14:46                   ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-17 15:11                     ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-23  7:04                       ` Glauber Costa
2012-07-25 15:28                         ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-17 16:52                     ` Shuah Khan
2012-07-30 10:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-30 19:56   ` David Rientjes
2012-07-30 20:41     ` Pekka Enberg
2012-07-31  2:07       ` David Rientjes
2012-07-31  6:05         ` Pekka Enberg
2012-08-06  3:41   ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-06 15:14     ` [PATCH RESEND] mm: Restructure kmem_cache_create() to move debug cache integrity checks into a new function Shuah Khan
2012-08-06 16:49       ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-08-06 17:03         ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-06 21:13           ` [PATCH v2] " Shuah Khan
2012-08-09 14:06             ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-09 14:13             ` Christoph Lameter (Open Source)
2012-08-09 17:01               ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-09 19:08                 ` Christoph Lameter (Open Source)
2012-08-09 19:33                   ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-12 16:40                     ` [PATCH v3] " Shuah Khan
2012-08-12 17:36                       ` Christoph
2012-08-15 23:53                       ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-16  6:40                         ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2012-08-08 14:14           ` [PATCH RESEND] " Christoph Lameter (Open Source)
2012-08-08 15:13             ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOJsxLFkrNVLhojV=id67xuhXDHyEzZiDo=_peRJtgcfAjC9bg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shuah.khan@hp.com \
    --cc=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).