* [PATCH mmc-next] mmc: sdhci: fix __sdhci_adma_write_desc
@ 2018-09-17 5:30 Jisheng Zhang
2018-09-17 6:21 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-09-17 18:35 ` Ulf Hansson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jisheng Zhang @ 2018-09-17 5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Hunter, Ulf Hansson; +Cc: linux-mmc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
If hosts provides ops->adma_write_desc, we should not fall back to the
general sdhci_adma_write_desc().
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
---
Hi Ulf, Adrian,
When I introduced .adma_write_desc, I made a mistake since v4 -- if the host
provide ops->adma_write_desc, we should just call it and don't fall back
to the general sdhci_adma_write_desc(). Before v4, the adma_write_desc return
int, since v4 there's no return value, so when I prepared the v4, I just
removed return, this is where the mistake is from. I dunno how to handle
this case, fold the patch into previous commit or apply it as a separate patch?
I'm very sorry for this. In fact, Adrian caught another similar bug during
review.
Sorry about the inconvenience,
Jisheng
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 0dda6f4b6a24..99bdae53fa2e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -649,8 +649,8 @@ static inline void __sdhci_adma_write_desc(struct sdhci_host *host,
{
if (host->ops->adma_write_desc)
host->ops->adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
-
- sdhci_adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
+ else
+ sdhci_adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
}
static void sdhci_adma_mark_end(void *desc)
--
2.19.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mmc-next] mmc: sdhci: fix __sdhci_adma_write_desc
2018-09-17 5:30 [PATCH mmc-next] mmc: sdhci: fix __sdhci_adma_write_desc Jisheng Zhang
@ 2018-09-17 6:21 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-09-17 18:35 ` Ulf Hansson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Hunter @ 2018-09-17 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jisheng Zhang, Ulf Hansson; +Cc: linux-mmc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 17/09/18 08:30, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> If hosts provides ops->adma_write_desc, we should not fall back to the
> general sdhci_adma_write_desc().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> ---
>
> Hi Ulf, Adrian,
>
> When I introduced .adma_write_desc, I made a mistake since v4 -- if the host
> provide ops->adma_write_desc, we should just call it and don't fall back
> to the general sdhci_adma_write_desc(). Before v4, the adma_write_desc return
> int, since v4 there's no return value, so when I prepared the v4, I just
> removed return, this is where the mistake is from. I dunno how to handle
> this case, fold the patch into previous commit or apply it as a separate patch?
Up to Ulf, but in any case:
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>
> I'm very sorry for this. In fact, Adrian caught another similar bug during
> review.
>
> Sorry about the inconvenience,
> Jisheng
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 0dda6f4b6a24..99bdae53fa2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -649,8 +649,8 @@ static inline void __sdhci_adma_write_desc(struct sdhci_host *host,
> {
> if (host->ops->adma_write_desc)
> host->ops->adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
> -
> - sdhci_adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
> + else
> + sdhci_adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
> }
>
> static void sdhci_adma_mark_end(void *desc)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mmc-next] mmc: sdhci: fix __sdhci_adma_write_desc
2018-09-17 5:30 [PATCH mmc-next] mmc: sdhci: fix __sdhci_adma_write_desc Jisheng Zhang
2018-09-17 6:21 ` Adrian Hunter
@ 2018-09-17 18:35 ` Ulf Hansson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Hansson @ 2018-09-17 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jisheng Zhang
Cc: Adrian Hunter, linux-mmc, Linux ARM, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 17 September 2018 at 07:30, Jisheng Zhang
<Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> wrote:
> If hosts provides ops->adma_write_desc, we should not fall back to the
> general sdhci_adma_write_desc().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> ---
>
> Hi Ulf, Adrian,
>
> When I introduced .adma_write_desc, I made a mistake since v4 -- if the host
> provide ops->adma_write_desc, we should just call it and don't fall back
> to the general sdhci_adma_write_desc(). Before v4, the adma_write_desc return
> int, since v4 there's no return value, so when I prepared the v4, I just
> removed return, this is where the mistake is from. I dunno how to handle
> this case, fold the patch into previous commit or apply it as a separate patch?
>
> I'm very sorry for this. In fact, Adrian caught another similar bug during
> review.
>
> Sorry about the inconvenience,
> Jisheng
No worries, mistakes happens - the important thing is that we fix them!
Thanks for providing the information above.
I have applied this as is for next.
Kind regards
Uffe
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 0dda6f4b6a24..99bdae53fa2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -649,8 +649,8 @@ static inline void __sdhci_adma_write_desc(struct sdhci_host *host,
> {
> if (host->ops->adma_write_desc)
> host->ops->adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
> -
> - sdhci_adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
> + else
> + sdhci_adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
> }
>
> static void sdhci_adma_mark_end(void *desc)
> --
> 2.19.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-17 18:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-17 5:30 [PATCH mmc-next] mmc: sdhci: fix __sdhci_adma_write_desc Jisheng Zhang
2018-09-17 6:21 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-09-17 18:35 ` Ulf Hansson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).