linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: "Anshuman Khandual" <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Keith Busch" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	"Vishal L Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Ross Zwisler" <zwisler@kernel.org>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	"Fengguang Wu" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Yaowei Bai" <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>,
	"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.de>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	andrew.murray@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	sboyd@kernel.org,
	"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: configurable sparsemem section size
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:24:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gdo5GcS8cbvLQr0Ez09z32VyrbVouW2GVV5UJf8R3HWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CK2bB5ahqLrekkTUSdzTE2BPSPbB9nk6nKs+LjTap2oF8X-w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:54 PM Pavel Tatashin
<pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
>
> <resending> from original email
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:48 PM Pavel Tatashin
> <patatash@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:07 AM Anshuman Khandual
> > <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04/24/2019 02:08 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > > > sparsemem section size determines the maximum size and alignment that
> > > > is allowed to offline/online memory block. The bigger the size the less
> > > > the clutter in /sys/devices/system/memory/*. On the other hand, however,
> > > > there is less flexability in what granules of memory can be added and
> > > > removed.
> > >
> > > Is there any scenario where less than a 1GB needs to be added on arm64 ?
> >
> > Yes, DAX hotplug loses 1G of memory without allowing smaller sections.
> > Machines on which we are going to be using this functionality have 8G
> > of System RAM, therefore losing 1G is a big problem.
> >
> > For details about using scenario see this cover letter:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190421014429.31206-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com/
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Recently, it was enabled in Linux to hotadd persistent memory that
> > > > can be either real NV device, or reserved from regular System RAM
> > > > and has identity of devdax.
> > >
> > > devdax (even ZONE_DEVICE) support has not been enabled on arm64 yet.
> >
> > Correct, I use your patches to enable ZONE_DEVICE, and  thus devdax on ARM64:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1554265806-11501-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that because ARM64's section size is 1G, and devdax must
> > > > have 2M label section, the first 1G is always missed when device is
> > > > attached, because it is not 1G aligned.
> > >
> > > devdax has to be 2M aligned ? Does Linux enforce that right now ?
> >
> > Unfortunately, there is no way around this. Part of the memory can be
> > reserved as persistent memory via device tree.
> >         memory@40000000 {
> >                 device_type = "memory";
> >                 reg = < 0x00000000 0x40000000
> >                         0x00000002 0x00000000 >;
> >         };
> >
> >         pmem@1c0000000 {
> >                 compatible = "pmem-region";
> >                 reg = <0x00000001 0xc0000000
> >                        0x00000000 0x80000000>;
> >                 volatile;
> >                 numa-node-id = <0>;
> >         };
> >
> > So, while pmem is section aligned, as it should be, the dax device is
> > going to be pmem start address + label size, which is 2M. The actual
> > DAX device starts at:
> > 0x1c0000000 + 2M.
> >
> > Because section size is 1G, the hotplug will able to add only memory
> > starting from
> > 0x1c0000000 + 1G

This is yet another example of where we need to break down the section
alignment requirement for arch_add_memory().

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/155552633539.2015392.2477781120122237934.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-24 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-23 20:38 [PATCH] arm64: configurable sparsemem section size Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-24  9:07 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-24 19:48   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-24 19:54     ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-24 20:24       ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-04-24 20:33         ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-25  3:06     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-25 15:25 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-25 15:31   ` Will Deacon
2019-04-25 15:41     ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-25 17:57       ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-26  5:33         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4gdo5GcS8cbvLQr0Ez09z32VyrbVouW2GVV5UJf8R3HWw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).