linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yash Shah <yash.shah@sifive.com>
To: "Paul Walmsley ( Sifive)" <paul.walmsley@g.sifive.com>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: "Paul Walmsley ( Sifive)" <paul.walmsley@g.sifive.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt ( Sifive)" <palmer@g.sifive.com>,
	"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"sorear2@gmail.com" <sorear2@gmail.com>,
	"aou@eecs.berkeley.edu" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"alex@ghiti.fr" <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Anup.Patel@wdc.com" <Anup.Patel@wdc.com>,
	"rppt@linux.ibm.com" <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sachin Ghadi <sachin.ghadi@sifive.com>,
	Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@g.sifive.com>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"allison@lohutok.net" <allison@lohutok.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add PCIe I/O BAR memory mapping
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:35:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CH2PR13MB336820C83536BF58C6EDDA688C650@CH2PR13MB3368.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1910240937350.20010@viisi.sifive.com>

> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> > On 2019-10-24 3:14 a.m., Yash Shah wrote:
> > > For I/O BARs to work correctly on RISC-V Linux, we need to establish
> > > a reserved memory region for them, so that drivers that wish to use
> > > I/O BARs can issue reads and writes against a memory region that is
> > > mapped to the host PCIe controller's I/O BAR MMIO mapping.
> >
> > I don't think other arches do this.
> 
> $ git grep 'define PCI_IOBASE' arch/
> arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:#define PCI_IOBASE            ((void __iomem
> *)PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE)
> arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:#define PCI_IOBASE          ((void __iomem
> *)PCI_IO_START)
> arch/m68k/include/asm/io_no.h:#define PCI_IOBASE        ((void __iomem *)
> PCI_IO_PA)
> arch/microblaze/include/asm/io.h:#define PCI_IOBASE     ((void __iomem
> *)_IO_BASE)
> arch/unicore32/include/asm/io.h:#define PCI_IOBASE
> PKUNITY_PCILIO_BASE
> arch/xtensa/include/asm/io.h:#define PCI_IOBASE         ((void __iomem
> *)XCHAL_KIO_BYPASS_VADDR)
> $
> 
> This is for the old x86-style, non-memory mapped I/O address space the
> legacy PCI stuff that one would use in{b,w,l}()/out{b,w,l}() for.
> 
> Yash, you might consider updating your patch description to note that this is
> for "legacy I/O BARs (i.e., non-MMIO BARs)" or something similar.  That
> might make things clearer.

Sure, will update the description and send v2.

- Yash

> 
> > ioremap() typically just uses virtual address space in the VMALLOC
> > region, PCI doesn't need it's own range. As far as I know the
> > ioremap() implementation in riscv already does this.
> >
> > In any case, 16MB for PCI bar space seems woefully inadequate.
> 
> The modern MMIO PCI resources wind up in jost controller apertures, which
> as you note, are usually much larger.  They don't go in this legacy space.
> 
> Regarding sizing - I haven't seen any PCIe cards with more than 64KiB of
> legacy I/O resources.  (16MiB / 64KiB) = 256, so 16MiB sounds reasonable
> from that point of view?  ARM64 is using that.
> 
> 
> - Paul

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-25  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-24  9:14 [PATCH] RISC-V: Add PCIe I/O BAR memory mapping Yash Shah
2019-10-24 16:24 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 16:51   ` Paul Walmsley
2019-10-24 17:07     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-25  6:35     ` Yash Shah [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CH2PR13MB336820C83536BF58C6EDDA688C650@CH2PR13MB3368.namprd13.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yash.shah@sifive.com \
    --cc=Anup.Patel@wdc.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=greentime.hu@g.sifive.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=palmer@g.sifive.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@g.sifive.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sachin.ghadi@sifive.com \
    --cc=sorear2@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).