* [PATCH 0/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup on the remove path
@ 2018-11-05 9:30 Ioana Ciornei
2018-11-05 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup the cpu array on dpaa2_io_down Ioana Ciornei
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ioana Ciornei @ 2018-11-05 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roy Pledge, Youri Querry, Leo Li, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu, Horia Geanta, Ioana Ciornei
This patch series cleans up the remove path in the dpio driver so that
successive bind/unbind commands behave properly.
Ioana Ciornei (2):
soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup the cpu array on dpaa2_io_down
soc: fsl: dpio: use a cpumask to identify which cpus are unused
drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 11 +++++++++++
include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup the cpu array on dpaa2_io_down 2018-11-05 9:30 [PATCH 0/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup on the remove path Ioana Ciornei @ 2018-11-05 9:30 ` Ioana Ciornei 2018-11-05 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] soc: fsl: dpio: use a cpumask to identify which cpus are unused Ioana Ciornei 2018-11-12 16:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup on the remove path Roy Pledge 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Ioana Ciornei @ 2018-11-05 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Roy Pledge, Youri Querry, Leo Li, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel Cc: Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu, Horia Geanta, Ioana Ciornei The dpio_by_cpu array should not contain a reference to a freed dpaa2_io object. This patch adds the necessary cleanup in dpaa2_io_down. Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> --- drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c index 9b17f72..21c3e32 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c @@ -160,6 +160,11 @@ struct dpaa2_io *dpaa2_io_create(const struct dpaa2_io_desc *desc) */ void dpaa2_io_down(struct dpaa2_io *d) { + spin_lock(&dpio_list_lock); + dpio_by_cpu[d->dpio_desc.cpu] = NULL; + list_del(&d->node); + spin_unlock(&dpio_list_lock); + kfree(d); } -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] soc: fsl: dpio: use a cpumask to identify which cpus are unused 2018-11-05 9:30 [PATCH 0/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup on the remove path Ioana Ciornei 2018-11-05 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup the cpu array on dpaa2_io_down Ioana Ciornei @ 2018-11-05 9:30 ` Ioana Ciornei 2018-12-03 18:39 ` Li Yang 2018-11-12 16:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup on the remove path Roy Pledge 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Ioana Ciornei @ 2018-11-05 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Roy Pledge, Youri Querry, Leo Li, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel Cc: Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu, Horia Geanta, Ioana Ciornei The current implementation of the dpio driver uses a static next_cpu variable to keep track of the index of the next cpu available. This approach does not handle well unbinding and binding dpio devices in a random order. For example, unbinding a dpio and then binding it again with the driver, will generate the below error: $ echo dpio.5 > /sys/bus/fsl-mc/drivers/fsl_mc_dpio/unbind $ echo dpio.5 > /sys/bus/fsl-mc/drivers/fsl_mc_dpio/bind [ 103.946380] fsl_mc_dpio dpio.5: probe failed. Number of DPIOs exceeds NR_CPUS. [ 103.955157] fsl_mc_dpio dpio.5: fsl_mc_driver_probe failed: -34 -bash: echo: write error: No such device Fix this error by keeping a global cpumask of unused cpus that will be updated at every dpaa2_dpio_[probe,remove]. Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> --- drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 6 ++++++ include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c index e58fcc9..832175c 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ struct dpio_priv { struct dpaa2_io *io; }; +static cpumask_var_t cpus_unused_mask; + static irqreturn_t dpio_irq_handler(int irq_num, void *arg) { struct device *dev = (struct device *)arg; @@ -86,7 +88,7 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) struct dpio_priv *priv; int err = -ENOMEM; struct device *dev = &dpio_dev->dev; - static int next_cpu = -1; + int possible_next_cpu; priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); if (!priv) @@ -128,17 +130,14 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) desc.dpio_id = dpio_dev->obj_desc.id; /* get the cpu to use for the affinity hint */ - if (next_cpu == -1) - next_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); - else - next_cpu = cpumask_next(next_cpu, cpu_online_mask); - - if (!cpu_possible(next_cpu)) { + possible_next_cpu = cpumask_first(cpus_unused_mask); + if (possible_next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) { dev_err(dev, "probe failed. Number of DPIOs exceeds NR_CPUS.\n"); err = -ERANGE; goto err_allocate_irqs; } - desc.cpu = next_cpu; + desc.cpu = possible_next_cpu; + cpumask_clear_cpu(possible_next_cpu, cpus_unused_mask); /* * Set the CENA regs to be the cache inhibited area of the portal to @@ -211,7 +210,7 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) { struct device *dev; struct dpio_priv *priv; - int err; + int err = 0, cpu; dev = &dpio_dev->dev; priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); @@ -220,6 +219,9 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) dpio_teardown_irqs(dpio_dev); + cpu = dpaa2_io_get_cpu(priv->io); + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus_unused_mask); + err = fsl_mc_portal_allocate(dpio_dev, 0, &dpio_dev->mc_io); if (err) { dev_err(dev, "MC portal allocation failed\n"); @@ -267,11 +269,16 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) static int dpio_driver_init(void) { + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_unused_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) + return -ENOMEM; + cpumask_copy(cpus_unused_mask, cpu_online_mask); + return fsl_mc_driver_register(&dpaa2_dpio_driver); } static void dpio_driver_exit(void) { + free_cpumask_var(cpus_unused_mask); fsl_mc_driver_unregister(&dpaa2_dpio_driver); } module_init(dpio_driver_init); diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c index 21c3e32..3198265 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c @@ -214,6 +214,12 @@ irqreturn_t dpaa2_io_irq(struct dpaa2_io *obj) return IRQ_HANDLED; } +int dpaa2_io_get_cpu(struct dpaa2_io *d) +{ + return d->dpio_desc.cpu; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dpaa2_io_get_cpu); + /** * dpaa2_io_service_register() - Prepare for servicing of FQDAN or CDAN * notifications on the given DPIO service. diff --git a/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h b/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h index ab51e40..1c1764f 100644 --- a/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h +++ b/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ struct dpaa2_io_notification_ctx { void *dpio_private; }; +int dpaa2_io_get_cpu(struct dpaa2_io *d); + int dpaa2_io_service_register(struct dpaa2_io *service, struct dpaa2_io_notification_ctx *ctx); void dpaa2_io_service_deregister(struct dpaa2_io *service, -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: fsl: dpio: use a cpumask to identify which cpus are unused 2018-11-05 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] soc: fsl: dpio: use a cpumask to identify which cpus are unused Ioana Ciornei @ 2018-12-03 18:39 ` Li Yang 2018-12-04 9:55 ` Ioana Ciornei 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Li Yang @ 2018-12-03 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ioana.ciornei Cc: Roy Pledge, youri.querry_1, lkml, moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE, Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu, Horia Geanta On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:31 AM Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> wrote: > > The current implementation of the dpio driver uses a static next_cpu > variable to keep track of the index of the next cpu available. This > approach does not handle well unbinding and binding dpio devices in a > random order. For example, unbinding a dpio and then binding it again > with the driver, will generate the below error: > > $ echo dpio.5 > /sys/bus/fsl-mc/drivers/fsl_mc_dpio/unbind > $ echo dpio.5 > /sys/bus/fsl-mc/drivers/fsl_mc_dpio/bind > [ 103.946380] fsl_mc_dpio dpio.5: probe failed. Number of DPIOs exceeds > NR_CPUS. > [ 103.955157] fsl_mc_dpio dpio.5: fsl_mc_driver_probe failed: -34 > -bash: echo: write error: No such device > > Fix this error by keeping a global cpumask of unused cpus that will be > updated at every dpaa2_dpio_[probe,remove]. > > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> > --- > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 6 ++++++ > include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c > index e58fcc9..832175c 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c > @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ struct dpio_priv { > struct dpaa2_io *io; > }; > > +static cpumask_var_t cpus_unused_mask; > + > static irqreturn_t dpio_irq_handler(int irq_num, void *arg) > { > struct device *dev = (struct device *)arg; > @@ -86,7 +88,7 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) > struct dpio_priv *priv; > int err = -ENOMEM; > struct device *dev = &dpio_dev->dev; > - static int next_cpu = -1; > + int possible_next_cpu; > > priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!priv) > @@ -128,17 +130,14 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) > desc.dpio_id = dpio_dev->obj_desc.id; > > /* get the cpu to use for the affinity hint */ > - if (next_cpu == -1) > - next_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); > - else > - next_cpu = cpumask_next(next_cpu, cpu_online_mask); > - > - if (!cpu_possible(next_cpu)) { > + possible_next_cpu = cpumask_first(cpus_unused_mask); > + if (possible_next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) { > dev_err(dev, "probe failed. Number of DPIOs exceeds NR_CPUS.\n"); > err = -ERANGE; > goto err_allocate_irqs; > } > - desc.cpu = next_cpu; > + desc.cpu = possible_next_cpu; > + cpumask_clear_cpu(possible_next_cpu, cpus_unused_mask); > > /* > * Set the CENA regs to be the cache inhibited area of the portal to > @@ -211,7 +210,7 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) > { > struct device *dev; > struct dpio_priv *priv; > - int err; > + int err = 0, cpu; > > dev = &dpio_dev->dev; > priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > @@ -220,6 +219,9 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) > > dpio_teardown_irqs(dpio_dev); > > + cpu = dpaa2_io_get_cpu(priv->io); > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus_unused_mask); > + > err = fsl_mc_portal_allocate(dpio_dev, 0, &dpio_dev->mc_io); > if (err) { > dev_err(dev, "MC portal allocation failed\n"); > @@ -267,11 +269,16 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) > > static int dpio_driver_init(void) > { > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_unused_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) > + return -ENOMEM; > + cpumask_copy(cpus_unused_mask, cpu_online_mask); > + > return fsl_mc_driver_register(&dpaa2_dpio_driver); > } > > static void dpio_driver_exit(void) > { > + free_cpumask_var(cpus_unused_mask); > fsl_mc_driver_unregister(&dpaa2_dpio_driver); > } > module_init(dpio_driver_init); > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c > index 21c3e32..3198265 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c > @@ -214,6 +214,12 @@ irqreturn_t dpaa2_io_irq(struct dpaa2_io *obj) > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } > > +int dpaa2_io_get_cpu(struct dpaa2_io *d) > +{ > + return d->dpio_desc.cpu; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dpaa2_io_get_cpu); Although this function is very simple function and probably self-explanatory, it is required that exported APIs have a kernel-doc comment just like other functions in the file. > + > /** > * dpaa2_io_service_register() - Prepare for servicing of FQDAN or CDAN > * notifications on the given DPIO service. > diff --git a/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h b/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h > index ab51e40..1c1764f 100644 > --- a/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h > +++ b/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h > @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ struct dpaa2_io_notification_ctx { > void *dpio_private; > }; > > +int dpaa2_io_get_cpu(struct dpaa2_io *d); > + > int dpaa2_io_service_register(struct dpaa2_io *service, > struct dpaa2_io_notification_ctx *ctx); > void dpaa2_io_service_deregister(struct dpaa2_io *service, > -- > 1.9.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 2/2] soc: fsl: dpio: use a cpumask to identify which cpus are unused 2018-12-03 18:39 ` Li Yang @ 2018-12-04 9:55 ` Ioana Ciornei 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Ioana Ciornei @ 2018-12-04 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leo Li Cc: Roy Pledge, Youri Querry, lkml, moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE, Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu, Horia Geanta > > > > The current implementation of the dpio driver uses a static next_cpu > > variable to keep track of the index of the next cpu available. This > > approach does not handle well unbinding and binding dpio devices in a > > random order. For example, unbinding a dpio and then binding it again > > with the driver, will generate the below error: > > > > $ echo dpio.5 > /sys/bus/fsl-mc/drivers/fsl_mc_dpio/unbind > > $ echo dpio.5 > /sys/bus/fsl-mc/drivers/fsl_mc_dpio/bind > > [ 103.946380] fsl_mc_dpio dpio.5: probe failed. Number of DPIOs > > exceeds NR_CPUS. > > [ 103.955157] fsl_mc_dpio dpio.5: fsl_mc_driver_probe failed: -34 > > -bash: echo: write error: No such device > > > > Fix this error by keeping a global cpumask of unused cpus that will be > > updated at every dpaa2_dpio_[probe,remove]. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> > > --- > > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- > > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 6 ++++++ > > include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h | 2 ++ > > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c > > b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c > > index e58fcc9..832175c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c > > @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ struct dpio_priv { > > struct dpaa2_io *io; > > }; > > > > +static cpumask_var_t cpus_unused_mask; > > + > > static irqreturn_t dpio_irq_handler(int irq_num, void *arg) { > > struct device *dev = (struct device *)arg; @@ -86,7 +88,7 @@ > > static int dpaa2_dpio_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) > > struct dpio_priv *priv; > > int err = -ENOMEM; > > struct device *dev = &dpio_dev->dev; > > - static int next_cpu = -1; > > + int possible_next_cpu; > > > > priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!priv) > > @@ -128,17 +130,14 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_probe(struct fsl_mc_device > *dpio_dev) > > desc.dpio_id = dpio_dev->obj_desc.id; > > > > /* get the cpu to use for the affinity hint */ > > - if (next_cpu == -1) > > - next_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); > > - else > > - next_cpu = cpumask_next(next_cpu, cpu_online_mask); > > - > > - if (!cpu_possible(next_cpu)) { > > + possible_next_cpu = cpumask_first(cpus_unused_mask); > > + if (possible_next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) { > > dev_err(dev, "probe failed. Number of DPIOs exceeds NR_CPUS.\n"); > > err = -ERANGE; > > goto err_allocate_irqs; > > } > > - desc.cpu = next_cpu; > > + desc.cpu = possible_next_cpu; > > + cpumask_clear_cpu(possible_next_cpu, cpus_unused_mask); > > > > /* > > * Set the CENA regs to be the cache inhibited area of the > > portal to @@ -211,7 +210,7 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_remove(struct > > fsl_mc_device *dpio_dev) { > > struct device *dev; > > struct dpio_priv *priv; > > - int err; > > + int err = 0, cpu; > > > > dev = &dpio_dev->dev; > > priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > @@ -220,6 +219,9 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_remove(struct fsl_mc_device > > *dpio_dev) > > > > dpio_teardown_irqs(dpio_dev); > > > > + cpu = dpaa2_io_get_cpu(priv->io); > > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus_unused_mask); > > + > > err = fsl_mc_portal_allocate(dpio_dev, 0, &dpio_dev->mc_io); > > if (err) { > > dev_err(dev, "MC portal allocation failed\n"); @@ > > -267,11 +269,16 @@ static int dpaa2_dpio_remove(struct fsl_mc_device > > *dpio_dev) > > > > static int dpio_driver_init(void) > > { > > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_unused_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + cpumask_copy(cpus_unused_mask, cpu_online_mask); > > + > > return fsl_mc_driver_register(&dpaa2_dpio_driver); > > } > > > > static void dpio_driver_exit(void) > > { > > + free_cpumask_var(cpus_unused_mask); > > fsl_mc_driver_unregister(&dpaa2_dpio_driver); > > } > > module_init(dpio_driver_init); > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c > > b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c > > index 21c3e32..3198265 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c > > @@ -214,6 +214,12 @@ irqreturn_t dpaa2_io_irq(struct dpaa2_io *obj) > > return IRQ_HANDLED; > > } > > > > +int dpaa2_io_get_cpu(struct dpaa2_io *d) { > > + return d->dpio_desc.cpu; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dpaa2_io_get_cpu); > > Although this function is very simple function and probably self-explanatory, it is > required that exported APIs have a kernel-doc comment just like other functions > in the file. Sorry for that. Will send an updated version to fix this. Ioana > > > + > > /** > > * dpaa2_io_service_register() - Prepare for servicing of FQDAN or CDAN > > * notifications on the given DPIO service. > > diff --git a/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h b/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h > > index ab51e40..1c1764f 100644 > > --- a/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h > > +++ b/include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h > > @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ struct dpaa2_io_notification_ctx { > > void *dpio_private; > > }; > > > > +int dpaa2_io_get_cpu(struct dpaa2_io *d); > > + > > int dpaa2_io_service_register(struct dpaa2_io *service, > > struct dpaa2_io_notification_ctx *ctx); > > void dpaa2_io_service_deregister(struct dpaa2_io *service, > > -- > > 1.9.1 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup on the remove path 2018-11-05 9:30 [PATCH 0/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup on the remove path Ioana Ciornei 2018-11-05 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup the cpu array on dpaa2_io_down Ioana Ciornei 2018-11-05 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] soc: fsl: dpio: use a cpumask to identify which cpus are unused Ioana Ciornei @ 2018-11-12 16:03 ` Roy Pledge 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Roy Pledge @ 2018-11-12 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ioana Ciornei, Youri Querry, Leo Li, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel Cc: Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu, Horia Geanta On 11/5/2018 4:30 AM, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > This patch series cleans up the remove path in the dpio driver so that > successive bind/unbind commands behave properly. > > Ioana Ciornei (2): > soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup the cpu array on dpaa2_io_down > soc: fsl: dpio: use a cpumask to identify which cpus are unused > > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-driver.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 11 +++++++++++ > include/soc/fsl/dpaa2-io.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-04 9:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-11-05 9:30 [PATCH 0/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup on the remove path Ioana Ciornei 2018-11-05 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup the cpu array on dpaa2_io_down Ioana Ciornei 2018-11-05 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] soc: fsl: dpio: use a cpumask to identify which cpus are unused Ioana Ciornei 2018-12-03 18:39 ` Li Yang 2018-12-04 9:55 ` Ioana Ciornei 2018-11-12 16:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] soc: fsl: dpio: cleanup on the remove path Roy Pledge
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).