From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: ingenic: Fix regmap on X series SoCs
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:03:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DD537R.K2D13DXGNPGH@crapouillou.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209230452.19535-1-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
Hi Aidan,
Le mer., févr. 9 2022 at 23:04:54 +0000, Aidan MacDonald
<aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com> a écrit :
> The X series Ingenic SoCs have a shadow GPIO group which
> is at a higher offset than the other groups, and is used
> for all GPIO configuration. The regmap did not take this
> offset into account and set max_register too low. Writes
> to the shadow group registers were blocked, which made it
> impossible to change any pin configuration.
>
> Fix this by pretending there are at least 8 chips on any
> 'X' SoC for the purposes of calculating max_register. This
> ensures the shadow group is accessible.
I don't like your solution, it sounds very hacky. I think it would make
more sense to use a dedicated x1000_pinctrl_regmap_config that would be
used for the X1000 SoC. That would also allow you to express that there
are no registers in the 0x400-0x700 range (through
regmap_config.wr_table / .rd_table).
Cheers,
-Paul
> Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c
> index 2712f51eb238..9d2bccda50f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c
> @@ -4168,7 +4168,10 @@ static int __init ingenic_pinctrl_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(base);
>
> regmap_config = ingenic_pinctrl_regmap_config;
> - regmap_config.max_register = chip_info->num_chips *
> chip_info->reg_offset;
> + if (chip_info->version >= ID_X1000)
> + regmap_config.max_register = MIN(8, chip_info->num_chips) *
> chip_info->reg_offset;
> + else
> + regmap_config.max_register = chip_info->num_chips *
> chip_info->reg_offset;
>
> jzpc->map = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, ®map_config);
> if (IS_ERR(jzpc->map)) {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-09 23:04 [PATCH] pinctrl: ingenic: Fix regmap on X series SoCs Aidan MacDonald
2022-02-10 10:18 ` Zhou Yanjie
2022-02-10 11:03 ` Paul Cercueil [this message]
2022-02-10 23:10 ` Aidan MacDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DD537R.K2D13DXGNPGH@crapouillou.net \
--to=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).