RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH 2/5] platform: surface: Propagate ACPI Dependency

[Jarrett Schultz <jaschultz@microsoft.com>]

Hi,

> Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> writes: 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 1/14/22 09:29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Hi Felipe,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:21 AM Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> >>>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:03 PM Jarrett Schultz
> <jaschultzms@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Since the Surface XBL Driver does not depend on ACPI, the
> >>>>> platform/surface directory as a whole no longer depends on ACPI.
> >>>>> With respect to this, the ACPI dependency is moved into each
> >>>>> config that depends on ACPI individually.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jarrett Schultz <jaschultz@microsoft.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 272479928172edf0
> ("platform:
> >>>> surface: Propagate ACPI Dependency").
> >>>>
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/platform/surface/Kconfig
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/surface/Kconfig
> >>>>> @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  menuconfig SURFACE_PLATFORMS
> >>>>>         bool "Microsoft Surface Platform-Specific Device Drivers"
> >>>>> -       depends on ACPI
> >>>>>         default y
> >>>>>         help
> >>>>>           Say Y here to get to see options for platform-specific
> >>>>> device drivers
> >>>>
> >>>> Without any dependency, all users configuring a kernel are now
> >>>> asked about this. Is there any other platform dependency that can
> >>>> be used instead?
> >>>
> >>> there's probably no symbol that would be true for x86 and arm64
> >>> while being false for everything else. Any ideas?
> >>
> >> depends on ARM64 || X86 || COMPILE_TEST?
> >
> > That sounds reasonable to me, I would be happy to take a patch for that.
> 
> fair enough, let's see what Jarrett replies
> 
> --
> Balbi

Sounds good to me, I'll include this in the next patch version. Thank you for pointing this out.

-Jarrett