linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 0/1] nvmem: Add support for write-only instances, and clean-up
@ 2020-03-18 14:49 Nicholas Johnson
  2020-03-18 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] nvmem: Add support for write-only instances Nicholas Johnson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Johnson @ 2020-03-18 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Mika Westerberg, Srinivas Kandagatla, Nicholas Johnson

Hello all,

Previous version: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/16/1051

Changed since previous version:

- No longer leaking objects such as idr and gpio.

- Got rid of accidental line of diff removing blank line.

- Rebased on top of [0] as requested in [1] - no conflicts, anyway.

[0]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/srini/nvmem.git/tree/drivers/nvmem/core.c?h=for-next

[1]
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/18/171

Nicholas Johnson (1):
  nvmem: Add support for write-only instances

 drivers/nvmem/core.c        | 10 +++++--
 drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 1/1] nvmem: Add support for write-only instances
  2020-03-18 14:49 [PATCH v5 0/1] nvmem: Add support for write-only instances, and clean-up Nicholas Johnson
@ 2020-03-18 15:20 ` Nicholas Johnson
  2020-03-18 16:08   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
  2020-03-24 12:23   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Johnson @ 2020-03-18 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Mika Westerberg, Srinivas Kandagatla, Nicholas Johnson

There is at least one real-world use-case for write-only nvmem
instances. Refer to 03cd45d2e219 ("thunderbolt: Prevent crash if
non-active NVMem file is read").

Add support for write-only nvmem instances by adding attrs for 0200.

Change nvmem_register() to abort if NULL group is returned from
nvmem_sysfs_get_groups().

Return NULL from nvmem_sysfs_get_groups() in invalid cases.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au>
---
 drivers/nvmem/core.c        | 10 +++++--
 drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 77d890d36..ddc7be514 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -381,6 +381,14 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
 	nvmem->type = config->type;
 	nvmem->reg_read = config->reg_read;
 	nvmem->reg_write = config->reg_write;
+	nvmem->dev.groups = nvmem_sysfs_get_groups(nvmem, config);
+	if (!nvmem->dev.groups) {
+		ida_simple_remove(&nvmem_ida, nvmem->id);
+		gpiod_put(nvmem->wp_gpio);
+		kfree(nvmem);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
 	if (!config->no_of_node)
 		nvmem->dev.of_node = config->dev->of_node;
 
@@ -395,8 +403,6 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
 	nvmem->read_only = device_property_present(config->dev, "read-only") ||
 			   config->read_only || !nvmem->reg_write;
 
-	nvmem->dev.groups = nvmem_sysfs_get_groups(nvmem, config);
-
 	device_initialize(&nvmem->dev);
 
 	dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n", config->name);
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c b/drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c
index 9e0c429cd..4ceac8680 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c
@@ -196,16 +196,49 @@ static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups[] = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
+/* write only permission, root only */
+static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_wo_root_nvmem = {
+	.attr	= {
+		.name	= "nvmem",
+		.mode	= 0200,
+	},
+	.write	= bin_attr_nvmem_write,
+};
+
+static struct bin_attribute *nvmem_bin_wo_root_attributes[] = {
+	&bin_attr_wo_root_nvmem,
+	NULL,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group nvmem_bin_wo_root_group = {
+	.bin_attrs	= nvmem_bin_wo_root_attributes,
+	.attrs		= nvmem_attrs,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_wo_root_dev_groups[] = {
+	&nvmem_bin_wo_root_group,
+	NULL,
+};
+
 const struct attribute_group **nvmem_sysfs_get_groups(
 					struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
 					const struct nvmem_config *config)
 {
-	if (config->root_only)
-		return nvmem->read_only ?
-			nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups :
-			nvmem_rw_root_dev_groups;
+	/* Read-only */
+	if (nvmem->reg_read && (!nvmem->reg_write || nvmem->read_only))
+		return config->root_only ?
+			nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups : nvmem_ro_dev_groups;
+
+	/* Read-write */
+	if (nvmem->reg_read && nvmem->reg_write && !nvmem->read_only)
+		return config->root_only ?
+			nvmem_rw_root_dev_groups : nvmem_rw_dev_groups;
+
+	/* Write-only, do not honour request for global writable entry */
+	if (!nvmem->reg_read && nvmem->reg_write && !nvmem->read_only)
+		return config->root_only ? nvmem_wo_root_dev_groups : NULL;
 
-	return nvmem->read_only ? nvmem_ro_dev_groups : nvmem_rw_dev_groups;
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -224,17 +257,24 @@ int nvmem_sysfs_setup_compat(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
 	if (!config->base_dev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (nvmem->read_only) {
+	if (nvmem->reg_read && (!nvmem->reg_write || nvmem->read_only)) {
 		if (config->root_only)
 			nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_ro_root_nvmem;
 		else
 			nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_ro_nvmem;
-	} else {
+	} else if (!nvmem->reg_read && nvmem->reg_write && !nvmem->read_only) {
+		if (config->root_only)
+			nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_wo_root_nvmem;
+		else
+			return -EINVAL;
+	} else if (nvmem->reg_read && nvmem->reg_write && !nvmem->read_only) {
 		if (config->root_only)
 			nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_rw_root_nvmem;
 		else
 			nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_rw_nvmem;
-	}
+	} else
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	nvmem->eeprom.attr.name = "eeprom";
 	nvmem->eeprom.size = nvmem->size;
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] nvmem: Add support for write-only instances
  2020-03-18 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] nvmem: Add support for write-only instances Nicholas Johnson
@ 2020-03-18 16:08   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
  2020-03-24 12:23   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Srinivas Kandagatla @ 2020-03-18 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nicholas Johnson, linux-kernel; +Cc: Mika Westerberg



On 18/03/2020 15:20, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> There is at least one real-world use-case for write-only nvmem
> instances. Refer to 03cd45d2e219 ("thunderbolt: Prevent crash if
> non-active NVMem file is read").
> 
> Add support for write-only nvmem instances by adding attrs for 0200.
> 
> Change nvmem_register() to abort if NULL group is returned from
> nvmem_sysfs_get_groups().
> 
> Return NULL from nvmem_sysfs_get_groups() in invalid cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Johnson<nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au>
> ---
>   drivers/nvmem/core.c        | 10 +++++--
>   drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Applied thanks,

--srini

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] nvmem: Add support for write-only instances
  2020-03-18 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] nvmem: Add support for write-only instances Nicholas Johnson
  2020-03-18 16:08   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
@ 2020-03-24 12:23   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Srinivas Kandagatla @ 2020-03-24 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nicholas Johnson, linux-kernel; +Cc: Mika Westerberg, Greg KH

Sorry for such late review, but I did endup finding two new issues with 
this patch.

On 18/03/2020 15:20, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> There is at least one real-world use-case for write-only nvmem
> instances. Refer to 03cd45d2e219 ("thunderbolt: Prevent crash if
> non-active NVMem file is read").
> 
> Add support for write-only nvmem instances by adding attrs for 0200.
> 
> Change nvmem_register() to abort if NULL group is returned from
> nvmem_sysfs_get_groups().
> 
> Return NULL from nvmem_sysfs_get_groups() in invalid cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au>
> ---
>   drivers/nvmem/core.c        | 10 +++++--
>   drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 77d890d36..ddc7be514 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -381,6 +381,14 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
>   	nvmem->type = config->type;
>   	nvmem->reg_read = config->reg_read;
>   	nvmem->reg_write = config->reg_write;
> +	nvmem->dev.groups = nvmem_sysfs_get_groups(nvmem, config);
> +	if (!nvmem->dev.groups) {
> +		ida_simple_remove(&nvmem_ida, nvmem->id);
> +		gpiod_put(nvmem->wp_gpio);
> +		kfree(nvmem);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +	}

returning NULL is valid usecase here, consider it like not having 
CONFIG_NVMEM_SYSFS so no need to check the return value.

But a warning/error message from nvmem_sysfs_get_groups would help debug 
in case of invalid configurations.

> +
>   	if (!config->no_of_node)
>   		nvmem->dev.of_node = config->dev->of_node;
>   
> @@ -395,8 +403,6 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
>   	nvmem->read_only = device_property_present(config->dev, "read-only") ||
>   			   config->read_only || !nvmem->reg_write;
>   
> -	nvmem->dev.groups = nvmem_sysfs_get_groups(nvmem, config);
> -
Moving this to before read_only flag is set would not work! as 
nvmem_sysfs_get_groups() is going to use read_only flag.

Ideally you do not need to change anything in core.c file and just 
update nvmem-sysfs.c should be enough.


>   	device_initialize(&nvmem->dev);
>   
>   	dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n", config->name);
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c b/drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c
> index 9e0c429cd..4ceac8680 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/nvmem-sysfs.c
> @@ -196,16 +196,49 @@ static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups[] = {
>   	NULL,
>   };
>   
> +/* write only permission, root only */
> +static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_wo_root_nvmem = {
> +	.attr	= {
> +		.name	= "nvmem",
> +		.mode	= 0200,
> +	},
> +	.write	= bin_attr_nvmem_write,
> +};
> +
> +static struct bin_attribute *nvmem_bin_wo_root_attributes[] = {
> +	&bin_attr_wo_root_nvmem,
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group nvmem_bin_wo_root_group = {
> +	.bin_attrs	= nvmem_bin_wo_root_attributes,
> +	.attrs		= nvmem_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_wo_root_dev_groups[] = {
> +	&nvmem_bin_wo_root_group,
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
>   const struct attribute_group **nvmem_sysfs_get_groups(
>   					struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>   					const struct nvmem_config *config)
>   {
> -	if (config->root_only)
> -		return nvmem->read_only ?
> -			nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups :
> -			nvmem_rw_root_dev_groups;
> +	/* Read-only */
> +	if (nvmem->reg_read && (!nvmem->reg_write || nvmem->read_only))
> +		return config->root_only ?
> +			nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups : nvmem_ro_dev_groups;
> +
> +	/* Read-write */
> +	if (nvmem->reg_read && nvmem->reg_write && !nvmem->read_only)
> +		return config->root_only ?
> +			nvmem_rw_root_dev_groups : nvmem_rw_dev_groups;
> +
> +	/* Write-only, do not honour request for global writable entry */
> +	if (!nvmem->reg_read && nvmem->reg_write && !nvmem->read_only)
> +		return config->root_only ? nvmem_wo_root_dev_groups : NULL;
>   
> -	return nvmem->read_only ? nvmem_ro_dev_groups : nvmem_rw_dev_groups;
> +	return NULL;
>   }
>   
>   /*
> @@ -224,17 +257,24 @@ int nvmem_sysfs_setup_compat(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>   	if (!config->base_dev)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	if (nvmem->read_only) {
> +	if (nvmem->reg_read && (!nvmem->reg_write || nvmem->read_only)) {
>   		if (config->root_only)
>   			nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_ro_root_nvmem;
>   		else
>   			nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_ro_nvmem;
> -	} else {
> +	} else if (!nvmem->reg_read && nvmem->reg_write && !nvmem->read_only) {
> +		if (config->root_only)
> +			nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_wo_root_nvmem;
> +		else
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +	} else if (nvmem->reg_read && nvmem->reg_write && !nvmem->read_only) {
>   		if (config->root_only)
>   			nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_rw_root_nvmem;
>   		else
>   			nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_rw_nvmem;
> -	}
> +	} else
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>   	nvmem->eeprom.attr.name = "eeprom";
>   	nvmem->eeprom.size = nvmem->size;
>   #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-24 12:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-18 14:49 [PATCH v5 0/1] nvmem: Add support for write-only instances, and clean-up Nicholas Johnson
2020-03-18 15:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] nvmem: Add support for write-only instances Nicholas Johnson
2020-03-18 16:08   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2020-03-24 12:23   ` Srinivas Kandagatla

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).