* LMbench results for 2.5.40
@ 2002-10-01 22:08 Patrick Mau
2002-10-01 22:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-01 23:15 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Mau @ 2002-10-01 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel
Hallo,
these are LMbench results for 2.4.18 and 2.5.40 (two runs).
All results where obtained in single-user mode after a fresh
reboot.
2.5.40 was compiled with CONFIG_PREEMPT=n.
Could someone explain the results I marked with '???' ?
The ones under 'Local Communication Bandwidth'.
Patrick
L M B E N C H 2 . 0 S U M M A R Y
------------------------------------
Basic system parameters
----------------------------------------------------
Host OS Description Mhz
--------- ------------- ----------------------- ----
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
Processor, Processes - times in microseconds - smaller is better
----------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS Mhz null null open selct sig sig fork exec sh
call I/O stat clos TCP inst hndl proc proc proc
--------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.42 2.29 6.637 1.12 2.71 93.5 445. 6145
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.77 1.51 2.41 6.830 1.14 2.83 116. 499. 6779
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.76 1.51 2.38 6.527 1.14 2.82 117. 512. 6577
Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better
-------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 2p/0K 2p/16K 2p/64K 8p/16K 8p/64K 16p/16K 16p/64K
ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw
--------- ------------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.750 1.7800 4.3400 1.8500 23.8 3.85000 30.1
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.130 1.8300 4.4200 2.0900 21.7 4.37000 30.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.170 1.9300 4.4100 2.4100 21.8 3.70000 30.6
*Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 2p/0K Pipe AF UDP RPC/ TCP RPC/ TCP
ctxsw UNIX UDP TCP conn
--------- ------------- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.750 4.979 7.29 12.9 23.2 14.3 28.0 44.1
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.130 5.200 7.97 13.5 23.4 15.3 28.9 47.8
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.170 5.575 8.02 13.7 23.8 15.2 29.6 47.9
File & VM system latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
--------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 0K File 10K File Mmap Prot Page
Create Delete Create Delete Latency Fault Fault
--------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ----- -----
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.6 5.6840 56.9 10.4 1190.0 1.310 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 31.9 6.4960 61.2 14.4 1444.0 1.360 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 31.9 6.4530 60.5 14.4 1445.0 1.346 2.00000
*Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better
-----------------------------------------------------------
Host OS Pipe AF TCP File Mmap Bcopy Bcopy Mem Mem
UNIX reread reread (libc) (hand) read write
--------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -----
tony Linux 2.4.18 1538 2303 1301 1967.1 2007.9 855.8 898.3 2004 1099.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1360 2190 303. 1827.6 1979.3 804.8 857.5 1976 1201.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1231 2140 309. 1836.3 1980.1 831.2 886.1 1979 1319.
????
Memory latencies in nanoseconds - smaller is better
(WARNING - may not be correct, check graphs)
---------------------------------------------------
Host OS Mhz L1 $ L2 $ Main mem Guesses
--------- ------------- ---- ----- ------ -------- -------
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.838 7.6860 118.2
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.862 7.7870 123.8
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.837 7.7820 123.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40
2002-10-01 22:08 LMbench results for 2.5.40 Patrick Mau
@ 2002-10-01 22:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-02 17:33 ` Patrick Mau
2002-10-02 17:38 ` Patrick Mau
2002-10-01 23:15 ` David S. Miller
1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2002-10-01 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick Mau; +Cc: Linux Kernel
Patrick Mau wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> these are LMbench results for 2.4.18 and 2.5.40 (two runs).
> All results where obtained in single-user mode after a fresh
> reboot.
>
> 2.5.40 was compiled with CONFIG_PREEMPT=n.
>
> Could someone explain the results I marked with '???' ?
> The ones under 'Local Communication Bandwidth'.
any chance you can run each set of tests three times? (I know it takes
longer, but it's better for statistical purposes...)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40
2002-10-01 22:16 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2002-10-02 17:33 ` Patrick Mau
2002-10-08 19:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-02 17:38 ` Patrick Mau
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Mau @ 2002-10-02 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Linux Kernel
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:16:34PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> any chance you can run each set of tests three times? (I know it takes
> longer, but it's better for statistical purposes...)
Hallo Jeff,
sorry for the late reply, I had to work all day. Below are five
sequencial runs of lmbench with 2.4.18 and 2.5.40. Kernel 2.5 was
compiled without CONFIG_PREEMPT.
I only rebooted between kernels, not between each run.
All numbers were obtained in single-user mode.
Patrick
L M B E N C H 2 . 0 S U M M A R Y
------------------------------------
Basic system parameters
----------------------------------------------------
Host OS Description Mhz
--------- ------------- ----------------------- ----
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
Processor, Processes - times in microseconds - smaller is better
----------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS Mhz null null open selct sig sig fork exec sh
call I/O stat clos TCP inst hndl proc proc proc
--------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.42 2.30 6.645 1.11 2.70 95.6 452. 6155
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.45 2.29 6.736 1.11 2.70 93.1 449. 6263
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.45 2.26 6.637 1.11 2.68 94.4 455. 6185
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.42 2.27 6.644 1.11 2.70 94.3 451. 6201
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.43 2.31 10.6 1.11 2.70 93.6 453. 6172
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.75 1.54 2.36 6.521 1.13 2.83 116. 500. 6700
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.75 1.52 2.40 6.550 1.12 2.83 115. 505. 6759
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.75 1.51 2.38 9.482 1.12 2.84 114. 508. 6549
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.75 1.51 2.42 6.608 1.12 2.85 117. 511. 6650
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.75 1.51 2.38 6.524 1.12 2.83 115. 517. 6775
Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better
-------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 2p/0K 2p/16K 2p/64K 8p/16K 8p/64K 16p/16K 16p/64K
ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw
--------- ------------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.850 1.7300 4.0600 1.8700 21.4 4.57000 29.7
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.800 1.7200 3.9100 1.9500 23.8 4.27000 29.7
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.860 1.6800 3.8900 1.9800 22.4 3.79000 29.7
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.830 1.7000 3.7500 2.7800 19.6 4.37000 29.6
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.730 1.6700 4.0600 1.9500 22.0 3.84000 29.8
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.090 1.9000 4.4700 2.3100 23.7 5.52000 30.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.140 1.9000 4.4200 2.3100 22.3 4.01000 30.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.100 1.8900 4.4700 2.1100 22.4 4.32000 30.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.110 1.9300 4.4700 2.0500 23.5 3.87000 30.5
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.130 1.9100 4.4400 2.1100 24.3 4.44000 30.6
*Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 2p/0K Pipe AF UDP RPC/ TCP RPC/ TCP
ctxsw UNIX UDP TCP conn
--------- ------------- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.850 4.991 7.30 12.8 23.1 14.4 28.0 45.2
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.800 4.897 7.15 12.9 23.7 14.3 29.0 43.9
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.860 4.893 7.21 12.8 23.0 14.7 28.4 599K
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.830 4.901 7.20 12.9 23.2 14.4 28.1 44.4
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.730 4.909 7.20 13.0 22.7 14.4 28.1 44.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.090 5.235 7.92 13.7 23.6 15.2 29.3 48.3
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.140 5.416 7.99 13.6 24.1 15.2 29.1 48.5
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.100 5.200 7.89 13.6 23.7 15.4 29.2 49.0
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.110 5.280 7.91 13.5 23.8 15.2 29.2 48.5
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.130 5.462 7.89 13.6 23.7 15.3 29.0 48.3
File & VM system latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
--------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 0K File 10K File Mmap Prot Page
Create Delete Create Delete Latency Fault Fault
--------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ----- -----
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.6820 56.7 10.5 1196.0 1.324 2.00000
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.3 5.7120 56.7 10.6 1187.0 1.318 2.00000
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.7000 56.7 10.5 1187.0 1.352 2.00000
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.6280 55.5 10.4 1187.0 1.331 2.00000
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.6610 57.1 10.6 1186.0 1.309 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 32.1 6.5480 62.0 14.5 1442.0 1.338 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 32.1 6.5980 61.0 14.6 1445.0 1.341 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 32.1 6.5130 59.8 14.4 1451.0 1.343 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 32.3 6.5550 60.5 14.4 1450.0 1.307 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 32.2 6.5800 60.1 14.5 1451.0 1.411 2.00000
*Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better
-----------------------------------------------------------
Host OS Pipe AF TCP File Mmap Bcopy Bcopy Mem Mem
UNIX reread reread (libc) (hand) read write
--------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -----
tony Linux 2.4.18 1568 2343 648. 1964.5 2007.7 840.3 907.7 2007 1078.
tony Linux 2.4.18 1451 2326 577. 1926.7 2008.0 845.9 892.6 2004 1144.
tony Linux 2.4.18 1575 2303 1301 1967.6 2007.8 851.6 901.4 2007 1189.
tony Linux 2.4.18 1569 2335 1281 1966.0 2005.3 873.9 901.4 2007 1228.
tony Linux 2.4.18 1533 2356 1118 1964.4 2007.9 887.7 913.3 2004 1272.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1266 2120 295. 1819.4 1980.0 810.3 858.5 1975 1216.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1366 2192 293. 1819.0 1980.8 831.4 884.1 1976 1288.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1388 2161 278. 1815.2 1979.3 850.5 891.4 1978 1334.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1348 2197 299. 1838.5 1979.1 842.1 904.6 1975 1360.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1367 2192 609. 1837.7 1980.8 858.5 926.8 1975 1357.
Memory latencies in nanoseconds - smaller is better
(WARNING - may not be correct, check graphs)
---------------------------------------------------
Host OS Mhz L1 $ L2 $ Main mem Guesses
--------- ------------- ---- ----- ------ -------- -------
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.838 7.7160 117.8
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.838 7.7160 118.1
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.889 7.7140 118.2
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.908 7.7250 118.0
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.839 7.7140 117.8
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.868 7.8170 122.5
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.838 7.8160 123.8
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.849 7.8190 124.0
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.838 7.8170 122.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.849 7.8220 124.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40
2002-10-02 17:33 ` Patrick Mau
@ 2002-10-08 19:04 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2002-10-08 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick Mau; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, Linux Kernel
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Patrick Mau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:16:34PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > any chance you can run each set of tests three times? (I know it takes
> > longer, but it's better for statistical purposes...)
>
> Hallo Jeff,
>
> sorry for the late reply, I had to work all day. Below are five
> sequencial runs of lmbench with 2.4.18 and 2.5.40. Kernel 2.5 was
> compiled without CONFIG_PREEMPT.
>
> I only rebooted between kernels, not between each run.
> All numbers were obtained in single-user mode.
One thing which is pretty definite is that many of the latencies are worse
in newer kernels, and many bandwidth types are also worse. I have seen
statements that this is due to debugging code in the kernel and that it
can and will be fixed in the production versions. I sure hope that claim
is correct. I believe the same thing was said about 2.2 vs. 2.4 numbers,
and that difference hasn't gone away yet.
It's not the magnitude of the change that bothers me, but the direction.
> Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Host OS 2p/0K 2p/16K 2p/64K 8p/16K 8p/64K 16p/16K 16p/64K
> ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw
> --------- ------------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
> tony Linux 2.4.18 0.850 1.7300 4.0600 1.8700 21.4 4.57000 29.7
> tony Linux 2.4.18 0.800 1.7200 3.9100 1.9500 23.8 4.27000 29.7
> tony Linux 2.4.18 0.860 1.6800 3.8900 1.9800 22.4 3.79000 29.7
> tony Linux 2.4.18 0.830 1.7000 3.7500 2.7800 19.6 4.37000 29.6
> tony Linux 2.4.18 0.730 1.6700 4.0600 1.9500 22.0 3.84000 29.8
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1.090 1.9000 4.4700 2.3100 23.7 5.52000 30.6
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1.140 1.9000 4.4200 2.3100 22.3 4.01000 30.6
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1.100 1.8900 4.4700 2.1100 22.4 4.32000 30.6
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1.110 1.9300 4.4700 2.0500 23.5 3.87000 30.5
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1.130 1.9100 4.4400 2.1100 24.3 4.44000 30.6
>
> *Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Host OS 2p/0K Pipe AF UDP RPC/ TCP RPC/ TCP
> ctxsw UNIX UDP TCP conn
> --------- ------------- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
> tony Linux 2.4.18 0.850 4.991 7.30 12.8 23.1 14.4 28.0 45.2
> tony Linux 2.4.18 0.800 4.897 7.15 12.9 23.7 14.3 29.0 43.9
> tony Linux 2.4.18 0.860 4.893 7.21 12.8 23.0 14.7 28.4 599K
> tony Linux 2.4.18 0.830 4.901 7.20 12.9 23.2 14.4 28.1 44.4
> tony Linux 2.4.18 0.730 4.909 7.20 13.0 22.7 14.4 28.1 44.6
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1.090 5.235 7.92 13.7 23.6 15.2 29.3 48.3
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1.140 5.416 7.99 13.6 24.1 15.2 29.1 48.5
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1.100 5.200 7.89 13.6 23.7 15.4 29.2 49.0
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1.110 5.280 7.91 13.5 23.8 15.2 29.2 48.5
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1.130 5.462 7.89 13.6 23.7 15.3 29.0 48.3
>
> File & VM system latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Host OS 0K File 10K File Mmap Prot Page
> Create Delete Create Delete Latency Fault Fault
> --------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ----- -----
> tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.6820 56.7 10.5 1196.0 1.324 2.00000
> tony Linux 2.4.18 29.3 5.7120 56.7 10.6 1187.0 1.318 2.00000
> tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.7000 56.7 10.5 1187.0 1.352 2.00000
> tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.6280 55.5 10.4 1187.0 1.331 2.00000
> tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.6610 57.1 10.6 1186.0 1.309 2.00000
> tony Linux 2.5.40 32.1 6.5480 62.0 14.5 1442.0 1.338 2.00000
> tony Linux 2.5.40 32.1 6.5980 61.0 14.6 1445.0 1.341 2.00000
> tony Linux 2.5.40 32.1 6.5130 59.8 14.4 1451.0 1.343 2.00000
> tony Linux 2.5.40 32.3 6.5550 60.5 14.4 1450.0 1.307 2.00000
> tony Linux 2.5.40 32.2 6.5800 60.1 14.5 1451.0 1.411 2.00000
>
> *Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Host OS Pipe AF TCP File Mmap Bcopy Bcopy Mem Mem
> UNIX reread reread (libc) (hand) read write
> --------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -----
> tony Linux 2.4.18 1568 2343 648. 1964.5 2007.7 840.3 907.7 2007 1078.
> tony Linux 2.4.18 1451 2326 577. 1926.7 2008.0 845.9 892.6 2004 1144.
> tony Linux 2.4.18 1575 2303 1301 1967.6 2007.8 851.6 901.4 2007 1189.
> tony Linux 2.4.18 1569 2335 1281 1966.0 2005.3 873.9 901.4 2007 1228.
> tony Linux 2.4.18 1533 2356 1118 1964.4 2007.9 887.7 913.3 2004 1272.
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1266 2120 295. 1819.4 1980.0 810.3 858.5 1975 1216.
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1366 2192 293. 1819.0 1980.8 831.4 884.1 1976 1288.
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1388 2161 278. 1815.2 1979.3 850.5 891.4 1978 1334.
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1348 2197 299. 1838.5 1979.1 842.1 904.6 1975 1360.
> tony Linux 2.5.40 1367 2192 609. 1837.7 1980.8 858.5 926.8 1975 1357.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40
2002-10-01 22:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-02 17:33 ` Patrick Mau
@ 2002-10-02 17:38 ` Patrick Mau
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Mau @ 2002-10-02 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Linux Kernel
Hallo Jeff,
sorry for the late reply, I had to work all day. Below are five
sequencial runs of lmbench with 2.4.18 and 2.5.40. Kernel 2.5 was
compiled without CONFIG_PREEMPT.
I only rebooted between kernels, not between each run.
All numbers were obtained in single-user mode.
Patrick
L M B E N C H 2 . 0 S U M M A R Y
------------------------------------
Basic system parameters
----------------------------------------------------
Host OS Description Mhz
--------- ------------- ----------------------- ----
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.4.18 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
tony Linux 2.5.40 i686-pc-linux-gnu 2400
Processor, Processes - times in microseconds - smaller is better
----------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS Mhz null null open selct sig sig fork exec sh
call I/O stat clos TCP inst hndl proc proc proc
--------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.42 2.30 6.645 1.11 2.70 95.6 452. 6155
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.45 2.29 6.736 1.11 2.70 93.1 449. 6263
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.45 2.26 6.637 1.11 2.68 94.4 455. 6185
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.42 2.27 6.644 1.11 2.70 94.3 451. 6201
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.67 0.75 1.43 2.31 10.6 1.11 2.70 93.6 453. 6172
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.75 1.54 2.36 6.521 1.13 2.83 116. 500. 6700
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.75 1.52 2.40 6.550 1.12 2.83 115. 505. 6759
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.75 1.51 2.38 9.482 1.12 2.84 114. 508. 6549
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.75 1.51 2.42 6.608 1.12 2.85 117. 511. 6650
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.66 0.75 1.51 2.38 6.524 1.12 2.83 115. 517. 6775
Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better
-------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 2p/0K 2p/16K 2p/64K 8p/16K 8p/64K 16p/16K 16p/64K
ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw
--------- ------------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.850 1.7300 4.0600 1.8700 21.4 4.57000 29.7
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.800 1.7200 3.9100 1.9500 23.8 4.27000 29.7
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.860 1.6800 3.8900 1.9800 22.4 3.79000 29.7
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.830 1.7000 3.7500 2.7800 19.6 4.37000 29.6
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.730 1.6700 4.0600 1.9500 22.0 3.84000 29.8
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.090 1.9000 4.4700 2.3100 23.7 5.52000 30.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.140 1.9000 4.4200 2.3100 22.3 4.01000 30.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.100 1.8900 4.4700 2.1100 22.4 4.32000 30.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.110 1.9300 4.4700 2.0500 23.5 3.87000 30.5
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.130 1.9100 4.4400 2.1100 24.3 4.44000 30.6
*Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 2p/0K Pipe AF UDP RPC/ TCP RPC/ TCP
ctxsw UNIX UDP TCP conn
--------- ------------- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.850 4.991 7.30 12.8 23.1 14.4 28.0 45.2
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.800 4.897 7.15 12.9 23.7 14.3 29.0 43.9
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.860 4.893 7.21 12.8 23.0 14.7 28.4 599K
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.830 4.901 7.20 12.9 23.2 14.4 28.1 44.4
tony Linux 2.4.18 0.730 4.909 7.20 13.0 22.7 14.4 28.1 44.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.090 5.235 7.92 13.7 23.6 15.2 29.3 48.3
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.140 5.416 7.99 13.6 24.1 15.2 29.1 48.5
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.100 5.200 7.89 13.6 23.7 15.4 29.2 49.0
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.110 5.280 7.91 13.5 23.8 15.2 29.2 48.5
tony Linux 2.5.40 1.130 5.462 7.89 13.6 23.7 15.3 29.0 48.3
File & VM system latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
--------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 0K File 10K File Mmap Prot Page
Create Delete Create Delete Latency Fault Fault
--------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ----- -----
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.6820 56.7 10.5 1196.0 1.324 2.00000
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.3 5.7120 56.7 10.6 1187.0 1.318 2.00000
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.7000 56.7 10.5 1187.0 1.352 2.00000
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.6280 55.5 10.4 1187.0 1.331 2.00000
tony Linux 2.4.18 29.2 5.6610 57.1 10.6 1186.0 1.309 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 32.1 6.5480 62.0 14.5 1442.0 1.338 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 32.1 6.5980 61.0 14.6 1445.0 1.341 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 32.1 6.5130 59.8 14.4 1451.0 1.343 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 32.3 6.5550 60.5 14.4 1450.0 1.307 2.00000
tony Linux 2.5.40 32.2 6.5800 60.1 14.5 1451.0 1.411 2.00000
*Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better
-----------------------------------------------------------
Host OS Pipe AF TCP File Mmap Bcopy Bcopy Mem Mem
UNIX reread reread (libc) (hand) read write
--------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -----
tony Linux 2.4.18 1568 2343 648. 1964.5 2007.7 840.3 907.7 2007 1078.
tony Linux 2.4.18 1451 2326 577. 1926.7 2008.0 845.9 892.6 2004 1144.
tony Linux 2.4.18 1575 2303 1301 1967.6 2007.8 851.6 901.4 2007 1189.
tony Linux 2.4.18 1569 2335 1281 1966.0 2005.3 873.9 901.4 2007 1228.
tony Linux 2.4.18 1533 2356 1118 1964.4 2007.9 887.7 913.3 2004 1272.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1266 2120 295. 1819.4 1980.0 810.3 858.5 1975 1216.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1366 2192 293. 1819.0 1980.8 831.4 884.1 1976 1288.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1388 2161 278. 1815.2 1979.3 850.5 891.4 1978 1334.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1348 2197 299. 1838.5 1979.1 842.1 904.6 1975 1360.
tony Linux 2.5.40 1367 2192 609. 1837.7 1980.8 858.5 926.8 1975 1357.
Memory latencies in nanoseconds - smaller is better
(WARNING - may not be correct, check graphs)
---------------------------------------------------
Host OS Mhz L1 $ L2 $ Main mem Guesses
--------- ------------- ---- ----- ------ -------- -------
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.838 7.7160 117.8
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.838 7.7160 118.1
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.889 7.7140 118.2
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.908 7.7250 118.0
tony Linux 2.4.18 2400 0.839 7.7140 117.8
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.868 7.8170 122.5
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.838 7.8160 123.8
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.849 7.8190 124.0
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.838 7.8170 122.6
tony Linux 2.5.40 2400 0.849 7.8220 124.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40
2002-10-01 22:08 LMbench results for 2.5.40 Patrick Mau
2002-10-01 22:16 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2002-10-01 23:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-01 23:37 ` Larry McVoy
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2002-10-01 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mau; +Cc: linux-kernel
From: Patrick Mau <mau@oscar.prima.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 00:08:54 +0200
Could someone explain the results I marked with '???' ?
The ones under 'Local Communication Bandwidth'.
It's due to debugging code in the loopback net driver.
It copies every TCP data packet twice. This will go away
before the 2.6 release.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40
2002-10-01 23:15 ` David S. Miller
@ 2002-10-01 23:37 ` Larry McVoy
2002-10-08 18:55 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 2002-10-01 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: mau, linux-kernel
> From: Patrick Mau <mau@oscar.prima.de>
> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 00:08:54 +0200
>
> Could someone explain the results I marked with '???' ?
> The ones under 'Local Communication Bandwidth'.
By the way, the place you will probably see variance in LMbench is in the
context switch benchmarks, it's almost certainly due to randomness in
cache layout and there isn't a thing we can do about it. You can run a
zillion runs to get an average but please realize that is an *average*.
The context switch number are accurate, the low ones represent no cache
collisions and the high ones represent lots of cache collisions.
FYI. I don't like it either.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40
2002-10-01 23:37 ` Larry McVoy
@ 2002-10-08 18:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-08 19:07 ` Larry McVoy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2002-10-08 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry McVoy; +Cc: David S. Miller, mau, linux-kernel
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Larry McVoy wrote:
> By the way, the place you will probably see variance in LMbench is in the
> context switch benchmarks, it's almost certainly due to randomness in
> cache layout and there isn't a thing we can do about it. You can run a
> zillion runs to get an average but please realize that is an *average*.
> The context switch number are accurate, the low ones represent no cache
> collisions and the high ones represent lots of cache collisions.
>
> FYI. I don't like it either.
Thank you, that explains some things I've seen in my context switching
benchmark as well, which uses a bunch of different services to transfer
tiny data from on process to another.
Time for some statistical jiggery-pokery, dust off deviant mean or some
such.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40
2002-10-08 18:55 ` Bill Davidsen
@ 2002-10-08 19:07 ` Larry McVoy
2002-10-10 13:21 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 2002-10-08 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bill Davidsen; +Cc: Larry McVoy, David S. Miller, mau, linux-kernel
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:55:01PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> > By the way, the place you will probably see variance in LMbench is in the
> > context switch benchmarks, it's almost certainly due to randomness in
> > cache layout and there isn't a thing we can do about it. You can run a
> > zillion runs to get an average but please realize that is an *average*.
> > The context switch number are accurate, the low ones represent no cache
> > collisions and the high ones represent lots of cache collisions.
> >
> > FYI. I don't like it either.
>
> Thank you, that explains some things I've seen in my context switching
> benchmark as well, which uses a bunch of different services to transfer
> tiny data from on process to another.
>
> Time for some statistical jiggery-pokery, dust off deviant mean or some
> such.
I personally think that you should try a scatter plot and you should
get something sort of like http://www.bitmover.com/disks/sek.gif which
is read latency times scatter plotted nicely showing the effect of seeks
and the effects of rotational delay. The height of the band is what I'd
expect to see in the context switch results - there should be an even
distribution between the min and the max assuming that you can vary the
pages which get allocated when you run the tests.
The average is a misleading number, you really want a min/max style number.
I'd be quite interested if someone were to go off and do this.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40
2002-10-08 19:07 ` Larry McVoy
@ 2002-10-10 13:21 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2002-10-10 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry McVoy; +Cc: David S. Miller, mau, linux-kernel
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:55:01PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > > FYI. I don't like it either.
> >
> > Thank you, that explains some things I've seen in my context switching
> > benchmark as well, which uses a bunch of different services to transfer
> > tiny data from on process to another.
> >
> > Time for some statistical jiggery-pokery, dust off deviant mean or some
> > such.
>
> I personally think that you should try a scatter plot and you should
> get something sort of like http://www.bitmover.com/disks/sek.gif which
> is read latency times scatter plotted nicely showing the effect of seeks
> and the effects of rotational delay. The height of the band is what I'd
> expect to see in the context switch results - there should be an even
> distribution between the min and the max assuming that you can vary the
> pages which get allocated when you run the tests.
>
> The average is a misleading number, you really want a min/max style number.
> I'd be quite interested if someone were to go off and do this.
Well, I have high and low, I currently report both avg and median values,
and both average and "deviant mean average" compared to the noload case.
The test is almost ready for public release, I just have to finish the
docs. I know, if it was hard to write it should be hard to understand...
*deviant mean average - the average of all data points within one S.D. of
the mean. Average of "the stuff in the middle of the performance range."
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-10 13:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-01 22:08 LMbench results for 2.5.40 Patrick Mau
2002-10-01 22:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-02 17:33 ` Patrick Mau
2002-10-08 19:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-02 17:38 ` Patrick Mau
2002-10-01 23:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-01 23:37 ` Larry McVoy
2002-10-08 18:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-08 19:07 ` Larry McVoy
2002-10-10 13:21 ` Bill Davidsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).
