* Re: Linux 2.5.71
@ 2003-06-15 0:21 Larry McVoy
2003-06-17 16:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 2003-06-15 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Linus said:
> I think I'll call this kernel the "sticky turtle", in honor of that
> historic "greased weasel" kernel, and as a comment on how sadly dependent
> I've become on the daily BK snapshots. It's been too long since 2.5.70.
I think more releases are good but for the snapshot people...
There are multiple options:
bk pull bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@kernel.bkbits.net:/home/cvs co linux-2.5
and Ben Collins is working on a bkSVN gateway (it's actually a
BK->CVS->SVN but whatever) so that will be an option soon as well. Huh,
while I'm thinking about it since we're hosting the CVS tree there is no
good reason not to host the SVN tree as well, I have to believe that SVN
uses less bandwidth than CVS (please, say it's so). Ben, send me or Davem
an ssh2 key and we'll set you up with an account on kernel.bkbits.net.
This isn't some advertising ploy so feel free to make some DNS entry which
points there, like svn.kernel.org, and then there is no BK in the picture.
HPA can help you with that. In fact, hpa, weren't we going to make a
cvs.kernel.org? If so, how about pointing that at kernel.bkbits.net for
the time being and then if someone steps forward to host that you can
just change the DNS entry?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux 2.5.71
2003-06-15 0:21 Linux 2.5.71 Larry McVoy
@ 2003-06-17 16:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-18 1:39 ` SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71] Larry McVoy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2003-06-17 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Followup to: <20030615002153.GA20896@work.bitmover.com>
By author: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> HPA can help you with that. In fact, hpa, weren't we going to make a
> cvs.kernel.org? If so, how about pointing that at kernel.bkbits.net for
> the time being and then if someone steps forward to host that you can
> just change the DNS entry?
>
Seems reasonable. I have been up over my ears for a while, and quite
frankly I'm trying to spend some of my Linux time working on my real
Linux projects, too...
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-17 16:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2003-06-18 1:39 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-18 1:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-19 17:44 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 2003-06-18 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-kernel
I'm happy to buy, register, and manage a neutral domain if someone can
think of one. Obviously, one of the BK based domains is not going to
cut it because people will think we're using it to advertise how BK is
going to rule the world, etc. etc. The only really neutral domain I
have is reggaeware.com and I'm not sure the world is ready to fill their
CVS needs from cvs.reggaeware.com, eh?
If someone can think of a cool name so we could have
bk.coolname.com
cvs.coolname.com
svn.coolname.com
etc
and it isn't taken, send me a suggestion and I'll get it set up and point it
at the right places.
It seems to me that kernel.org is the right place but if hpa is too busy
(which I understand and respect) then we need to come up with some sort of
domain which is unused, simple, and memorable. I'm aware of the levels of
distrust people have for bitmover but we could pay for it and run the DNS
servers and let some set of community agreed on people manage the DNS entries
if that makes people feel safe.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:13:53AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <20030615002153.GA20896@work.bitmover.com>
> By author: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > HPA can help you with that. In fact, hpa, weren't we going to make a
> > cvs.kernel.org? If so, how about pointing that at kernel.bkbits.net for
> > the time being and then if someone steps forward to host that you can
> > just change the DNS entry?
> >
>
> Seems reasonable. I have been up over my ears for a while, and quite
> frankly I'm trying to spend some of my Linux time working on my real
> Linux projects, too...
>
> -hpa
> --
> <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
> "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
> Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-18 1:39 ` SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71] Larry McVoy
@ 2003-06-18 1:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-18 1:14 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-18 3:38 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-19 17:44 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2003-06-18 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry McVoy; +Cc: linux-kernel
Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> It seems to me that kernel.org is the right place but if hpa is too busy
> (which I understand and respect) then we need to come up with some sort of
> domain which is unused, simple, and memorable. I'm aware of the levels of
> distrust people have for bitmover but we could pay for it and run the DNS
> servers and let some set of community agreed on people manage the DNS entries
> if that makes people feel safe.
>
I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-18 1:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2003-06-18 1:14 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-18 4:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-18 3:38 ` Larry McVoy
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ben Collins @ 2003-06-18 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: Larry McVoy, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:55:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Larry McVoy wrote:
> >
> > It seems to me that kernel.org is the right place but if hpa is too busy
> > (which I understand and respect) then we need to come up with some sort of
> > domain which is unused, simple, and memorable. I'm aware of the levels of
> > distrust people have for bitmover but we could pay for it and run the DNS
> > servers and let some set of community agreed on people manage the DNS entries
> > if that makes people feel safe.
> >
>
> I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-18 1:14 ` Ben Collins
@ 2003-06-18 4:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-18 4:35 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-18 20:09 ` Ben Collins
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2003-06-18 4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Followup to: <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
By author: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
>
> CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
>
So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net?
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-18 4:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2003-06-18 4:35 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-19 20:36 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-06-19 20:39 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-06-18 20:09 ` Ben Collins
1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 2003-06-18 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
> By author: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > >
> > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
> >
> > CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
> >
>
> So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net?
We only need cvs and svn; bk is hosted at linux.bkbits.net.
If someone else wants to either host or provide a hot backup for either of
these, that's cool with us.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-18 4:35 ` Larry McVoy
@ 2003-06-19 20:36 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-06-19 20:39 ` Bill Davidsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2003-06-19 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry McVoy; +Cc: H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Followup to: <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
> > By author: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > > >
> > > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> > > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
> > >
> > > CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
> > >
> >
> > So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net?
>
> We only need cvs and svn; bk is hosted at linux.bkbits.net.
Why would you *not* have bk.kernel.org as a CNAME? For ease of memory,
etc, it makes sense to do that. If someone knows about cvs.kernel.org,
they are more likely to guess the bk address. And vice-versa, of course.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-18 4:35 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-19 20:36 ` Bill Davidsen
@ 2003-06-19 20:39 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-06-20 0:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2003-06-19 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry McVoy; +Cc: H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Followup to: <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
> > By author: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > > >
> > > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> > > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
> > >
> > > CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
> > >
> >
> > So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net?
>
> We only need cvs and svn; bk is hosted at linux.bkbits.net.
It still makes sense to have a CNAME for bk.kernel.org to match the
others. Much easier to remember and guess; if you know one you can intuit
the others.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-19 20:39 ` Bill Davidsen
@ 2003-06-20 0:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2003-06-20 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Followup to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030619163732.12043A-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
By author: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > Followup to: <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
> > > By author: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > > > >
> > > > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> > > > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
> > > >
> > > > CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
> > > >
> > >
> > > So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net?
> >
> > We only need cvs and svn; bk is hosted at linux.bkbits.net.
>
> It still makes sense to have a CNAME for bk.kernel.org to match the
> others. Much easier to remember and guess; if you know one you can intuit
> the others.
>
I just added bk.kernel.org -> linux.bkbits.net.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-18 4:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-18 4:35 ` Larry McVoy
@ 2003-06-18 20:09 ` Ben Collins
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ben Collins @ 2003-06-18 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
> By author: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > >
> > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
> >
> > CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
> >
>
> So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net?
And for those that want to switch their SVN repo to the new URL:
# cd linux-2.5-bksvn
# svn switch --relocate svn://kernel.bkbits.net/linux-2.5/trunk \
svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.5/trunk
For 2.4, it should be obvious.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-18 1:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-18 1:14 ` Ben Collins
@ 2003-06-18 3:38 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-18 4:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 2003-06-18 3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: Larry McVoy, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:55:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Larry McVoy wrote:
> >
> > It seems to me that kernel.org is the right place but if hpa is too busy
> > (which I understand and respect) then we need to come up with some sort of
> > domain which is unused, simple, and memorable. I'm aware of the levels of
> > distrust people have for bitmover but we could pay for it and run the DNS
> > servers and let some set of community agreed on people manage the DNS entries
> > if that makes people feel safe.
> >
>
> I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
I think CNAMEs are all that we need now. BitMover and Penguin Computing
will host it for the time being and if we cross over to the dark side
someone else can step forward and host it and all you need to do is redo
the CNAMEs.
We do need to advertise the "URLs" for the CVS tree and the SVN tree and
the BK trees as well I suppose. Is that a Gooch/FAQ thing? Richard, you
still out there?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-18 3:38 ` Larry McVoy
@ 2003-06-18 4:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Arcangeli @ 2003-06-18 4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry McVoy, H. Peter Anvin, Larry McVoy, linux-kernel
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 08:38:16PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:55:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Larry McVoy wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems to me that kernel.org is the right place but if hpa is too busy
> > > (which I understand and respect) then we need to come up with some sort of
> > > domain which is unused, simple, and memorable. I'm aware of the levels of
> > > distrust people have for bitmover but we could pay for it and run the DNS
> > > servers and let some set of community agreed on people manage the DNS entries
> > > if that makes people feel safe.
> > >
> >
> > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
>
> I think CNAMEs are all that we need now. BitMover and Penguin Computing
> will host it for the time being and if we cross over to the dark side
> someone else can step forward and host it and all you need to do is redo
> the CNAMEs.
>
> We do need to advertise the "URLs" for the CVS tree and the SVN tree and
> the BK trees as well I suppose. Is that a Gooch/FAQ thing? Richard, you
> still out there?
this sounds fine to me. especially I can't think of an easier name to
remeber than cvs.kernel.org/svn.kernel.org ;)
thanks for taking care of those bits too.
Andrea
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
2003-06-18 1:39 ` SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71] Larry McVoy
2003-06-18 1:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2003-06-19 17:44 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen @ 2003-06-19 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> writes:
>I'm happy to buy, register, and manage a neutral domain if someone can
>think of one. Obviously, one of the BK based domains is not going to
>cut it because people will think we're using it to advertise how BK is
>going to rule the world, etc. etc. The only really neutral domain I
>have is reggaeware.com and I'm not sure the world is ready to fill their
>CVS needs from cvs.reggaeware.com, eh?
>If someone can think of a cool name so we could have
> bk.coolname.com
> cvs.coolname.com
> svn.coolname.com
According to InterNIC, hereisthesource.org is free... :-)
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
hps@intermeta.de +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <87k7bjbgu9.fsf@dbintra.dmz.luckynet.adm>]
* Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
[not found] <87k7bjbgu9.fsf@dbintra.dmz.luckynet.adm>
@ 2003-06-18 14:29 ` Larry McVoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 2003-06-18 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thunder Anklin; +Cc: linux-kernel, Larry McVoy
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:28:14PM +0200, Thunder Anklin wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 06:40:10 +0200, Larry wrote:
> > If someone else wants to either host or provide a hot backup for either of
> > these, that's cool with us.
>
> Is it also OK for you to provide public read-only rsync access to the
> CVS repository? That would be a nice thing to have, I suppose...
hpa already does, it's on kernel.org.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-20 0:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-15 0:21 Linux 2.5.71 Larry McVoy
2003-06-17 16:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-18 1:39 ` SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71] Larry McVoy
2003-06-18 1:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-18 1:14 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-18 4:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-18 4:35 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-19 20:36 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-06-19 20:39 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-06-20 0:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-06-18 20:09 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-18 3:38 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-18 4:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-19 17:44 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
[not found] <87k7bjbgu9.fsf@dbintra.dmz.luckynet.adm>
2003-06-18 14:29 ` Larry McVoy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).