From: "Peter A. Castro" <doctor@fruitbat.org>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: Kai Henningsen <kaih@khms.westfalen.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: PPC? (Was: Re: [RFC] /proc/ksyms change for IA64)
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 13:26:21 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0108051320320.6238-100000@gremlin.fruitbat.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29464.997040507@ocs3.ocs-net>
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> On 05 Aug 2001 11:29:00 +0200,
> kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) wrote:
> >kaos@ocs.com.au (Keith Owens) wrote on 02.08.01 in <22165.996722560@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>:
> >
> >> The IA64 use of descriptors for function pointers has bitten ksymoops.
> >> For those not familiar with IA64, &func points to a descriptor
> >> containing { &code, &data_context }.
> >
> >That sounds suspiciously like what I remember from PPC. How is this solved
> >on the PPC side?
>
> Best guess, without access to a PPC box, is that it is not solved. Any
> arch where function pointers go via a descriptor will have this
> problem.
>
> PPC users, does /proc/ksyms contain the address of the function code or
> the address of a descriptor which points to the code? It is easy to
> tell, if function entries in /proc/ksyms are close together (8-128
> bytes apart) and do not match the addresses in System.map then PPC has
> the same problem as IA64. If this is true, what is the layout of a PPC
> function descriptor so I can handle that case as well?
It's an address of a function. Verified by matching with the system map.
I'm not sure where to look for what you need, however. I've checked the
ppc arch specific code, but it's not apparent to me what I'm looking for
(sorry, I'm still learning about the kernel's structure). If you can
suggest what/where to look I'll dig it up for you.
--
Peter A. Castro <doctor@fruitbat.org> or <Peter.Castro@oracle.com>
"Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-05 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-02 3:22 [RFC] /proc/ksyms change for IA64 Keith Owens
2001-08-05 5:44 ` Rusty Russell
2001-08-05 7:16 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-05 14:02 ` Rusty Russell
2001-08-05 14:51 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-05 9:29 ` PPC? (Was: Re: [RFC] /proc/ksyms change for IA64) Kai Henningsen
2001-08-05 19:41 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-05 20:26 ` Peter A. Castro [this message]
2001-08-06 3:05 ` Brad Boyer
2001-08-06 22:43 ` Rob Barris
2001-08-07 3:47 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-08-19 1:27 ` [RFC] /proc/ksyms change for IA64 Richard Henderson
2001-08-21 6:53 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-21 17:47 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0108051320320.6238-100000@gremlin.fruitbat.org \
--to=doctor@fruitbat.org \
--cc=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).